Should BBMP be split into smaller bodies?

It was ironic to see the Chief Minister wonder on the Kasa Muktha programme, if BBMP should be split into smaller municipal bodies. Of course it should be. But the question should not be reduced to such a simplistic one. There is a whole lot more to consider.

(a) If we say that the ideal city is of a certain size, say no more than 2.5 million, then we should ask ourselves what we will do in 2023, when Bangalore’s population is higher by another 2.5 million people.

(b) What about fast urbanising areas outside BBMP? Why do we continue to pretend that those are ‘panchayat’ areas when they are clearly not?

(c) Why do BWSSB, BMTC and other service providers behave as though their obligation to the core/old Bangalore is different from their obligation to the newer areas? Does this mean, if BBMP is split into a core city and several others around it, the state government will go back to treating the suburbs as second-class cities?

(d) Instead of wondering what is to be done, why not read the constitution and the law? What happened to setting up the MPC for regional planning? The lack of a planning body is glaringly obvious.

(e) Why not let the cities run at their own pace? Why should the state government get involved in potholes and solid waste and all sorts of municipal issues? Is that what the CM plans to do in Mysore, Mangalore and Hubli too?

Sir, you are Chief Minister of the State, with a clear mandate. Please drive the economy and the governance of our institutions, and trust the cities to make the most of their own powers, plus others you should devolve to them. We will never be able to build a great city – not just Bangalore, but any other – unless we first accept that cities have a right to their own impetus for development, without constant interference from the state government. If the Centre treated our State government the way the State treats the city, would we accept that?

Comments:

  1. Vasanthkumar Mysoremath says:

    Mr.Mahesh Ashwin is right. Big is not beautiful always since there may be many factors that go into its working. Whose garbage is it anyway? For decades people have been claiming their Rights under the Constitution without caring for Duties and Responsibilities that follow those Rights. Kasa belongs to everybody, not only to BBMP, just because people pay taxes, it does not mean that the Commissioner of BBMP must come and sweep the street if a PK is absent. Like people have the Right to litter, there are others who have a Right to live in clean environs. Respect this also and start behaving or else Dandam Dashagunam Bhaveti. All of us had it coming and time to act is NOW. We must stop and think before we throw anything anywhere. At the same time, authorities must also be responsible and provide necessary facilities to help people stop littering.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…