Why are so many refugees leaving Chennai’s Kelambakkam camp?

Statistics from the UNHCR indicate that at least 11 Rohingyas have migrated from the camp at Kelambakkam over the past eight months. This video looks into what is driving them away from Chennai, a city where they feel safe and at home.

Far from Myanmar, their homeland, here they feel safe, but these 85 Rohingyas are not at home in the refugee camp in Kelambakkam. Dingy rooms that barely have ventilation, narrow stairways, cluttered spaces and untidy surroundings — the camp located on the outskirts of Chennai paints a sorry picture.

The deplorable living conditions probably don’t bother the Rohingya Muslims as much as they should, for they are happy to be alive. But does it give them a decent quality of life? No.

Space is the biggest constraint, a factor that is driving many refugees away from the camps. Each room is barely 10*8 square feet — stacked with utensils, mats, clothes and broken furniture for an average of four people living in it. Old sarees and shawls separate one room from another.

Open defecation is common at the camp, due to shortage of toilets.

The front yard and the common kitchen have sacks of clothes and abandoned furniture and have become a breeding ground for mosquitoes.  “The rooms are so hot that we sleep on the ground floor and in the front yard. We take bath at least four times a day to prevent rashes and skin infections,” says a refugee in the camp.

“Our children are older now. People are migrating, as it is hard for six people to adjust in a small room,” said another refugee. “But it is not right of us to demand. We are happy that the government provided us with shelter and schooling for our children,” he added.

At least 11 Rohingyas, including children, have migrated to other camps in Bangladesh and Jammu and Kashmir over the past eight months.  “A total of 94 Rohingyas including 52 children are living in the Kelambakkam camp,” according to statistics (as on September 2018) from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees (UNHCR). 

The instances of Indian government deporting Rohingyas and not welcoming new refugees has created a sense of insecurity among the Kelambakkam refugees. Meanwhile, the continuing violence and death of their kin at Myanmar add to the distress of the Rohingya fraternity. “My relative was killed a month ago. Whenever I learn such news, I only hope that the Indian government will continue to be friendly,” said one refugee, seeking anonymity.

(with reporting by Laasya Shekhar)

Comments:

  1. Mohamed says:

    Giving a accommodation and toilet facility on humanitarian basis a must. What is stopping us only God knows

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Check how your MPs have performed in Parliament (and here’s why)

From 100% attendance to only 26%, how did your MP perform this Budget Session? See who is truly representing your voice in our MP Tracker.

When Ranjan Gogoi, the former Chief Justice of India, retired from the Rajya Sabha two months ago, his performance in Parliament became a matter of debate. As per an analysis by Livelaw, Gogoi did not ask a question to the government even once during the six years of his tenure and participated in the debate on only one Bill.  More recently, when seven AAP MPs defected to BJP, another analysis by Indian Express revealed that one of these seven defecting MPs, Harbhajan Singh, a former cricketer, had only 26% attendance.  Why do we typically go around digging data on the…

Similar Story

Deepening reservoirs, rainwater harvesting: Sustainable alternatives to the Mamallan dam

Why Mamallan reservoir? Experts say Chennai's water future lies in greener solutions — desilting old reservoirs and maintaining neglected tanks.

Ever since the contentious Mamallan reservoir was proposed in the ecosensitive Kovalam–Nemmeli backwater system, fisher communities in Chennai have repeatedly asked: Does it have to be here? Experts and scientists say no, urging the government to abandon the project and work on sustainable alternatives.  Critics point to a long list of costs: high expenditure, land acquisition, and risks to livelihoods and biodiversity. As we have reported earlier, the central concern driving the project is the looming drinking water supply crisis – demand is projected to rise from 1,100 million litres a day (MLD) to over 2,500 MLD for the Greater…