When regulations force schools to close down

A rising spate of regulations in the education sector is slowly choking the supply. And Education departments around the country are catching up to Revenue and Transport departments in their levels of corruption. The irony is that the Education department officials turn a blind eye to the government schools, which often don’t meet even the most basic regulatory standards.

Unfortunately, parents whose kids are in private schools are not sufficiently worried about this. They believe that schools should be forced to keep fees as low as possible, while delivering quality education. They also believe that their children’s schools will pay bribes to remain in operation as they are.

This kind of self-interest will backfire. In a rising number of cases school owners are walking away from the sector altogether, tired of harassment by BEOs and others. 21,000 schools have closed since the enactment of the RTE Act, and my guess is that another 5000 or so that would have otherwise opened have decided not to. That means that there are at least 2 million fewer ‘places’ in schools as a result. And parents will continue to scramble more and more to get their wards into the schools that continue to operate.

Clean India needs policy reforms

In areas of executive action, the Centre can move fast, without buy-in from anyone else. PSUs, foreign affairs, lowering and raising taxes and cesses, altering procedures for documentation and other services of the Centre, etc. are therefore the most visible signs of energetic leadership by a new government. In other areas, we will need more than a canvas. We will need a strategic roadmap for achieving the goals that are identified.

Clean India needs policy reform (segregation, landfill avoidance, local rights). Smart Cities need open data. Loksatta’s proposed local transfer scheme (Rs.1000 / resident / year to each ward) will shift budgetary allocations. Make in India requires tackling the license and inspector raj. Genuine good governance requires an independent Lokpal at the Centre and Lokayukta in each state, and real powers to anti-corruption squads. More importantly, such changes shift the balance of power between citizens and netas, and make ordinary people more empowered to demand better outcomes from the system.

Thus far, while the PM is saying all the right things, there is no sign that the rest of the party is aligning with those goals in such evident, local levels. In fact, in a few cases (like the Lokpal) it seems like the party has overcome the PM’s goals, rather than the other way around. Every new PM gets a fresh starting clock, and people have been waiting for the ship to turn, hoping that this will happen eventually.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…