BBMP certifying the quality of its own work leads to bad roads

If an accident is caused by the poor condition of a road, should the BBMP be held responsible? And should the corporation be forced to pay compensation to such victims? There’s been a lot of heated debate about this following the unfortunate recent incident, in which a woman fell off a scooter and died as her husband swerved to avoid a pothole on the street.

With the cops booking the husband for negligent driving, and the BBMP pointing fingers at BDA, it seems that we were only too ready to add insult to the tragedy, whereas what is really needed is a close look at what the problem is, and how to solve it.

It is often difficult to tell, with certainty, what caused any specific accident, and which officials – if any – should be held responsible for it. But there is absolutely no doubt that there are very many accidents in the city that are caused by shoddy infrastructure and poor maintenance, and that the BBMP and other civic agencies together are responsible for countless injuries and many deaths each year.

That is, what is debatable in a single instance is indisputable when we look at the totality of the problem. And therefore, we should first focus on that whole picture.

Who decides if BBMP’s infrastructure is acceptable? As things stand today, BBMP itself does that. And that’s the problem. We have an executing agency whose work is not subject to any standards and regulation. BBMP tries to get around this by pretending that the contractors are doing the work, and it is itself the overseeing agency. But that’s not true. Whether done by itself or through contractors, it is BBMP that is legally responsible for its works.

Therefore, BBMP cannot be the institution that certifies the work. That has to be the work of an independent Urban Services Regulator. In the draft Urban Development Policy that was put together four years ago, this regulatory institution was proposed—to have jurisdiction over all public services in the city. It was grandly announced at an event in the Vidhana Soudha and then promptly forgotten.

Even today, this is the answer. Let’s create an independent regulator that can routinely look at all of the work that BBMP does—as well as that of other civic agencies – and pass both judgment and penalties on unaccpetable works. That would then set in place a system of accountability, and continuous improvements in the infrastructure of the city.

And in turn, that will ensure that in the future, there is less risk of anyone swerving to avoid a pothole, only to end up dead instead.

Related Articles

Garbage and potholes top the list of problems in Bengaluru
One for the road, two for the pothole
Residents transform pothole-ridden neighbourhood road to beautiful avenue
BBMP should build roads that are not susceptible to potholes


  1. Nanda says:

    This is a ridiculous situation: BBMP certifying its own work (especially if it is carried out through a BBMP selected contractor) is akin to a student grading his own answer paper after an examination

  2. N V Krishnakumar says:

    Thank God for the politicians, that Urban Development Policy report of 2010 has been confined to garbage. It is utter nonsense and recommends 8 different regulators.

    Looks like your mentor and ex-bureaucrat has conned the authors into thinking that more regulation is the answer to improving governance. So jobless politicians, ex-bureaucrats and former professors can has cushy government jobs with cabinet ranking posing as regulators.

    It is really a SHAME !!!!!

    What we need is less penny pinching by companies and more spending by palikie so we can have excellent companies with expertise to build roads.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Effective speed management critical in India to reduce road crash fatalities

Speeding accounts for over 71% of crash-related fatalities on Indian roads. Continuous monitoring and focussed action are a must.

Four hundred and twenty people continue to lose their lives on Indian roads every single day. In 2022, India recorded 4.43 lakh road crashes, resulting in the death of 1.63 lakh people. Vulnerable road-users like pedestrians, bicyclists and two-wheelers riders comprised 67% of the deceased. Road crashes also pose an economic burden, costing the exchequer 3.14% of India’s GDP annually.  These figures underscore the urgent need for effective interventions, aligned with global good practices. Sweden's Vision Zero road safety policy, adopted in 1997, focussed on modifying infrastructure to protect road users from unacceptable levels of risk and led to a…

Similar Story

Many roadblocks to getting a PUC certificate for your vehicle

Under new rule, vehicles owners have to pay heavy fines if they fail to get a pollution test done. But, the system to get a PUC certificate remains flawed.

Recently, there’s been news that the new traffic challan system will mandate a Rs 10,000 penalty on old or new vehicles if owners don't acquire the Pollution Under Control (PUC) certification on time. To tackle expired certificates, the system will use CCTV surveillance to identify non-compliant vehicles and flag them for blacklisting from registration. The rule ultimately has several drawbacks, given the difficulty in acquiring PUC certificates in the first place. The number of PUC centres in Chennai has reduced drastically with only a handful still operational. Only the petrol bunk-owned PUC centres charge the customers based on the tariff…