When selling banned ‘gutkha’ is easier than restoring a city lake

As part of its efforts to restore Chennai's Porur Lake, NGO Arappor Iyakkam educates people about the issues around the lake and also the politics that goes on around our urban water bodies.

Imagine a beautiful lake in your neighbourhood that is not just a lifeline in terms of freshwater for the city, but could also be a seat of leisure for you and your kids at the end of a tiring day, and home to a thriving, aquatic ecosystem. Instead it becomes, over decades, a disposal site for untreated sewage, marred by excessive encroachment and irresponsible, damaging activities like washing of clothes, cars etc. It is rarely desilted, and there is no proper outlet for the excess water leading to flooding of roads around it every rainy season.

That is a scenario that residents around Porur Lake will quickly identify with, which is why NGO Arappor Iyakkam, armed with findings from a recent audit of the waterbody and overwhelming support from the Porur chapter, decided to focus on restoration of the lake which has shrunk from over 450 acres to less than 250 acres.

Earlier in May this year, a 10-point charter (see table below) had been prepared and submitted to the Tiruvellore Collector.  However, this resulted in feeble action on the ground from the government, following which Arappor decided to create a people’s movement by educating the people on the issues found during the audits and the politics behind restoring our water bodies.


  1. Desilt the entire stretch of the water body
  2. Remove road laid below flyover and bring the lake together
  3. Draw borders and remove encroachments; all sides need to have sand banks and trees planted along these
  4. Remove encroachments on Thanthi Canal, integrating Porur and Chembarambakkam Lakes; block sewage inlets and create passages to let rainwater seep in
  5. Lay out the Surplus Outlet Canal properly (which is blocked currently)
  6. Fence the lake to prevent humans, vehicles and animals from dirtying the water
  7. Make provisions for using the lake to supply drinking water to locals around the area
  8. Immediately remove all advertisement boards from the area and prevent any further encroachment in this form
  9. Form a Water Body Consultative Team comprised of public and government officials who will work towards the goal of restoring the lake
  10. Form walkways along Porur Lake’s periphery and create an ambient and pleasing environment where young and old can spend their time in peace

Arappor had also given a call to NGOs, movements and individuals working for the welfare and restoration of the Porur Lake to gather on July 9, 2017. With over 250 people participating from Porur and Ramapuram areas, the venue was packed to the gates.

People at the event organised by Arappor Iyakkam to spread awareness about Porur Lake. Pic: Prashanth Goutham

What obstructs restoration?

“Will anyone here not want to save Porur lake?”

The opening question from Jayaram Venkatesan, Convenor of Arappor, drew a surprised silence from the audience, many among whom wondered why it arose, till he himself explained: “The very fact that 100% of the people here want the lake to be revived is testimony that we are working towards a positive change. Then, why are we having to face so much difficulty even to organize this event?”

Venkatesan was alluding to the fact that the meeting venue had to be shifted from the originally planned location on the main road to the inner parking area due to police pressure. “If there is an encroachment and we organise a protest against it, the police force do not provide necessary permissions, but they readily protect the encroachers. The venue of this meeting had to be shifted just 30 minutes prior to its start, due to pressure from them; why? We are only trying to save the Porur Lake, not sell Gutkha,” he demanded to know, referring to the recent scandal over the sale of the banned tobacco item. “Saving the Porur Lake is difficult, but selling banned Gutkha is easy and this is the politics that we all need to know and understand,” he retorted.

When Venkatesan talks of encroachers being protected, he refers to people with political clout, real estate mafia or big organizations which have already eaten into more than 50% of the lake area. For example, he cited how the Sri Ramachandra Education and Health Trust has received support from the government itself for its claims of land inside the lake.

Everyone claims that they want the waterbodies to be restored, so why is there no progress? What is stopping anyone from acting? The answer lies in people behind the scenes – political party workers, commercial vested interests who stand to benefit from its erosion,” said Venkatesan. In his view, the power that these selected vested interests can wield is far greater than the pressure that we as common people can exert. Politicians and government executives such as IAS, IPS are all agents of these invisible vested interests and that sums up the politics behind urban water bodies.

Given the 300 plus waterbodies in and around Chennai is accumulating over 1000 MLD of sewage everyday, while garbage, construction debris and even sewage transported in tankers is dumped into these at ease, it is difficult to deny that the government stands guilty as a principal offender in this space.

Venkatesan also pointed to a serious error made by the National Water Policy 2012 when it listed water as an “Economic Good” instead of a “fundamental right.” This resulted in commoditization of water leading to scandalous extraction by private companies and subsequent sale of the same to people for a price. This provision (of treating water as economic good) is intended for the privatization of water-related services, which is anti-people.

Where do the crores go?

Around Rs 100 crores were allocated to desilting of water bodies through the Kudimaramathu scheme in March but was said to have been spent within 18 days. In its recent audit of six waterbodies in Kanchipuram district, Arappor found that only one had an insignificantly small trench which was dug.

Drilling deeper into the mechanics of this allocation, it is noticed that Rs 100 crores for 1512 waterbodies translates to less than Rs 9 lakhs/site, which makes it easier to do away with tenders and issue contracts as per their whims and fancies. Immediately after this, another 300 crores were allocated under the same scheme.

Arappor emphasises that there is no one way or method to fight against the non-electoral politics of these forces, it needs to be a strong people’s movement. Common people must fight for the cause of Porur Lake, without focusing on who organized it. The 10-point charter in this regard forms a flexible base. Peaceful agitations and legal battles are some of the measures that could be adopted as a first step in this long journey.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Vote for clean air, water security and nature conservation: Environment and civil society groups

The youth of the country will bear the brunt of climate change impact in the absence of government action, say voluntary groups.

The country is going to the polls in one of the most keenly watched elections of all time, and a collective of 70 environment and civil society organisations have appealed to voters to assess the threat to the environment and ecology when they cast their votes in the Lok Sabha 2024 elections. Here is what the organisations have said in a joint statement: As Indians prepare to vote in the Lok Sabha elections this year, it is very important to think of the future of our democracy, especially the youth and their right to clean air and water security in…

Similar Story

Sanjay Van saga: Forest or park, what does Delhi need?

Rich in biodiversity, Sanjay Van in Delhi is a notified reserved forest. Here's why environmentalists fear it may soon be a thing of the past.

The Delhi Forest Department has officially notified the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) about reported tree cutting activities at Sanjay Van. The forest department's south division has verified the claim, citing an infringement of the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act (DPTA) 1994, due to the unauthorised felling of trees in Sanjay Van, Mehrauli, New Delhi. According to officials, the alleged incident came to light through the vigilance of environmental activists. The accusations stemmed from a volunteer organisation called "There is No Earth B," which conducts regular cleanup campaigns at Sanjay Van. With a volunteer base exceeding 1,500 individuals, the group engages…