Air quality data shows instant values, not comparable to PCB data clarifies Climate Trends

Equipment used is calibrated and the data has 90% match to the data from approved equipment, says the company that released the report.

In response to the statement issued by the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board refuting the findings of the air-quality monitoring work released by Co Media Lab and Climate Trends, the organisations have in turn issued a clarification that the exercise was done to measure peak hour pollution levels in the city for a select amount of time on select routes in the morning as well as in the evening. The objective of the study was to measure and bring to fore the personalised exposure levels one is being subjected to while traveling on busy roads for a few hours every day.

The press note issued on the 19th revealing the data has explicitly mentioned that the results are not comparable to the 24hr averages or the annual regulatory limits as it highlighted Particulate Pollution values for a short period of time only. Moreover, the values released to the press were the instant values for which regulatory limits do not apply and the issued press note emphasised the same.

The Pollution Control Board particularly mentions that the exercise carried out by us is in violation of the monitoring protocols and guidelines issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, these are guidelines laid out for measuring ambient air quality and the exercise was aimed at localised, personal exposure levels only. The two are not to be compared. Further, the was study also done to inform the public and citizen leaders who are actively championing the cause of clean air to engage in collective action with administrative bodies to minimise the impacts of pollution before the situation worsens.

This is a press note sent by Aishwarya Sudhir of Climate Trends, on behalf of Climate Trends and Co Media Lab, published here with minimal edits, in the section Message Forward, as a nonprofit public interest message.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Open letter to Chief Justice of India: Withdraw unjust remarks made against environmental groups

In the letter, conservationists, lawyers and civil society groups highlighted the constitutional right of citizens to demand the enforcement of environmental laws.

A collective of citizens, environmentalists, legal experts and civil society organisations from across India has demanded that the Supreme Court withdraw oral remarks made by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) during the Pipavav Port hearing on May 11, 2026. The group aims to ensure these comments are not misinterpreted as questioning the legitimacy of genuine environmental public-interest litigation, or the constitutional right of citizens and affected communities to demand the enforcement of environmental laws. In an open letter to the CJI, the coalition outlined urgent environmental concerns and the right of citizens to question irregularities in projects negatively impacting…

Similar Story

The trees we forget: What a city loses when the canopy disappears

Bengaluru's trees are more than shade; they are memory, identity, and resistance. Their loss leaves the city harsher and emptier.

Summer in India has been merciless this year, with many states recording temperatures above 42 degrees Celsius and rising reports of fatalities. Despite these harsh conditions, urban support continues for development projects that clear trees, wetlands, mangroves, and forests near cities. A recent Article 14 report provides data on thousands of trees that will soon be sacrificed nationally for infrastructure projects. Those opposing such unscientific large-scale tree felling are often labelled 'tree-huggers', 'anti-development' and 'anti-nationals'. While capitalism accelerates environmental degradation and the world faces a growing climate crisis, societal divisions deepen.  Yet, we give trees too little credit: Beings necessary…