Info for voters of Shivajinagar Constituency- MLA, Candidate, Voting and more

If you are one among the lakhs of voters of Shivajinagar, this is what you need to know!

Incumbent MLA: Roshan Baig R

List of candidates, 2018

R Roshan Baig
Party:Indian National Congress
  • Family: Wife, 2 dependants
  • Educational Qualification: BCom
  • Profession: Social Worker
  • Online:
    • Twitter:@rroshanbaig
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:NIL
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns:Self-1.15 cr, Spouse-4.44 lakhs
    • Movable Assets:Self-7.62 cr, Spouse-1.14 cr
    • Immovable Assets:Self-25.30 cr, Spouse-2.15 cr
    • Liabilities:Self-15.58 cr, Spouse-1.69 cr
Katta Subramanya Naidu
Party:Bharatiya Janata Party
  • Family: Wife, 3 dependants
  • Educational Qualification: SSLC
  • Profession: Real Estate
  • Online: 
    • Facebook:kattasubramanyanaiduofficial
    • Twitter: @kattasnaidu
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth
    • IT Returns: 52.91 lakhs
    • Movable Assets:Self- 2.94 cr, Spouse-7.04 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self-8.73 cr, Spouse-7.2 cr
    • Liabilities: NIL
Ayub Khan
Party:Aam Aadmi Party
  • Family:Wife, 3 dependants
  • Educational Qualification:4th Std
  • Profession:Auto Rickshaw Seconds Sale
  • Online
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth
    • IT Returns: 3.82 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-32k, Spouse-8.66lacs
    • Immovable Assets: NIL
    • Liabilities: NIL
Shaikh Masthan Ali
Party:Janata Dal (secular)
  • Family:Wife, 5 dependants
  • Educational Qualification:Class 7
  • Profession:Flower Decoration Business
  • Online:
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns:Self-3.88 lakhs, Spouse-25k, Dependants-20k
    • Movable Assets:Self-10 lakhs, Spouse-25k, Dependants-20k (dependents)
    • Immovable Assets:NIL
    • Liabilities:NIL

Full list of Candidates: 

[embeddoc url=”http://data.opencity.in/Documents/Recent/Karnataka-Assembly-Elections-2018-Candidates-AC-162.pdf” width=”100%”  download=”all”]

Previous Results:

2013 candidates Party Votes Age Vote Share %
R Roshan Baig INC 49649 59 54.62%
Nirmal Surana BJP 28794 49 31.68%
Abbas Ali Bohra JD(S) 5983 60 6.58%
I R Perumal KJP 2869 60 3.16%
Shaik Bahadur BSP 581 57 0.64%

 

2008 candidates Party Votes Age Vote Share%
R Roshan Baig INC 43013 54 53.53%
Nirmal Surana BJP 32617 44 40.59%
B M Ashfaq Ahmed JD(S) 1647 42 2.05%
K Murthy IND 982 45 1.22%
Charles Prabhakar BSP 804 57 1%

Citizen Demands:

About the Constituency:

[flexiblemap src=”http://data.opencity.in/Data/Karnataka-Assembly-Constituency-162.kml” width=”100%” height=”400px” ]

Shivaji Nagar, the bastion of Roshan Baig, is appreciated for its environment of communal harmony, with a large Muslim and considerable Tamil population. Voters here concur that Roshan Baig is in constant interaction with the people here.

Earlier, Shivaji Nagar had the lowest number of voters. Before the delimitation, Sampangiramanagar (ward 77), Vasanthnagar (78) and Shivajinagar (79) wards were included in this constituency. But now, Bharathinagar (80), Ulsoor (81) and Jayamahal (92) wards are included. Vidhana Soudha is part of the constituency.

In Halsoor, 2016, citizens filed an RTI to track the sanction of a Rs-4-crore-STP construction for their lake, but in vain. Other problems voiced by citizens in the constituency include garbage mismanagement, shortage of bus stops, parks, playgrounds, poor water supply and bad infrastructure. The Shivaji Nagar ward is a crowded market area, while other wards have a mix of diverse groups.

  • Total number of voters in 2008: 80,363
  • Total number of voters in 2013: 90,900  
  • The total number of registered voters currently:1,91,528.

See also: Shivaji Nagar: No infra support for the traders’ hub 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…