From waste wise projects to dry waste centers, story of trash in Bengaluru

The concept of dry waste collection centers (DWCCs) is not new for Bengaluru. This article tracks the process of how it all started, and formalisation of DWCCs in Bengaluru, by the government.

Kasa – Rasa center. Pic: Pinky Chandran

“There was a time when I didn’t have enough food to eat. Now I am so busy that I don’t have enough time for food,” says Krishna, once a waste picker, now runs  Domlur Dry Waste Collection Center Ward no 112, and employs six people.

Krishna is one of the many informal waste sector workers that run the Dry Waste Collection Centers (DWCC) in Bengaluru. DWCCs were set up following a Lok Adalat’s intervention directing the Municipality to set up these centers to enable ward level recycling in 2010. The Karnataka High Court further validated the direction in 2012, by instructing the municipality to set up necessary infrastructure to facilitate ward level decentralised management of waste for all categories.

What’s so special in it, one may ask. Scrap dealers anyway run junk shops in the neighbourhood, so what was the need for a Dry Waste Collection Center? Did Bengaluru need it? What were the origins of Dry Waste Collection Centers in the city?

Three-way segregation proposed way back in 1970s!

Anslem Rosario, a pioneer in building a case for the integration of informal waste workers in the city’s solid waste management from the 1970s says, “It was in the later 80s and early 90s that Mythri Sarva Seva Samithi Trust (MSSS) launched a pilot “Waste Wise project”, for 300 households in Jayanagar, where residents were given bamboo baskets to hold dry waste and were asked for three way segregation. While high value waste was sold at the household level to itinerant buyers, the low value waste was then sold to local scrap shops and wet waste was composted in a park.” This experiment further paved the way for many such community-based decentralised initiatives. By the early 1990s, there were 45 such initiatives operating on a smaller scale.

“In 2003, Center for Environment Education (CEE) launched a project titled Environment Improvement Programme for HSR Layout – Implementation of SWM Activities’, which mirrored the Waste Wise project, but on a larger scale covering 3000 households in all the seven sectors, and wet waste was sent to Karnataka Compost Development Corporation (KCDC), for composting, a separate shed in Sector 1 was used for secondary segregation of dry waste,” says Dr. Shyamala Mani, Professor,  National Institute of Advanced Studies ( NIAS). Thus began the evolution of dry waste collection centers.

Wealth out of waste by ITC

2003-2005 also marked the entry of many civil society-led initiatives like the Samarthanam Trust’s program on encouraging people to donate newspapers and Sahaas’s e-waste recycling program along with separate dry waste collection and in-situ organic waste management. In 2007-08, ITC launched its Wealth out of Waste (WOW) initiative to collect dry recyclable waste from large apartment complexes in Bengaluru and Hyderabad, motivating the start of the segregation-at-source counterculture in some middle to upper-middle class citizens of the city.

However all these initiatives functioned in isolated pockets and did not receive any large scale promotion till early 2009, when citizen groups got together to promote community-based decentralized waste management systems. “Around the same year, through series of meetings with the BBMP an unutilised shop space near the market area in Malleshwaram became operational, and became the basis for further advocacy for DWCCs in the city. Realising the futility of citizen’s level advocacy, without systems and processes being institutionalised, SWMRT approached Lok Adalat”, adds Anslem Rosario.

The case for decentralised set up was built following a detailed study on contract costs which revealed that the city was spending an estimated cost of 405 crores, for a total MSW contract of 89 packages for 198 wards of which 48% was being spent on the SWM component of door-to-door collection, including bulk generators and about 52% was being spent on street sweeping.

DWCC near Jaydeva. Pic: Pinky Chandran

48 crores can be saved with segregation

A cost benefit analysis of decentralised waste management around by the Solid Waste Management Roundtable (SWMRT) revealed that infrastructure investment in decentralised Waste Management like market biomethanation, garden/leaf composting and  DWCCs could divert/ manage 53 tonnes per day (about 25% of the total waste) and save the Municipality about Rs 48.8 crore annually, which is about 12% of the total garbage cost.

With the direction from the Lok Adalat, the first two DWCCs were allotted in March 2011 – HSR Layout and Anandnagar. While Anandnagar started with 200 households by Full Circle, HSR Layout began operations only in August 2011, following a series of awareness programs jointly conducted by IYCN and Radio Active CR 90.4 MHz.

The two major objectives of the HSR center were, validating the need for a neighbourhood DWCC by keeping track of quantities recycled and facilitating better access of waste to waste-pickers, and thereby creating livelihood opportunities. A similar project was launched in Gottigere, near Nandi Park Apartments in February 2012. Both the initiatives till January 2013 had recycled over 149562.1 kgs of waste, thus reinforcing the case for neighbourhood recycling centers.

“The DWCCs are expected to work on business principles, as it receives zero subsidies in operations from the Municipality” says Anslem Rosario.

Commissioning of DWCCs by BBMP

However the initial few steps in the commissioning of the DWCCs were very slow, despite the Lok Adalat orders. There was limited interest shown by BBMP in scaling up the project and there were only a handful of pilots operating in Bengaluru in 2012. BBMP passed up existing sheds constructed in 2009 by Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL), formerly Karnataka Land Army Corporation transit points as DWCC, which were the 6000 sqft double height buildings in Yelankha, Domlur and Malleshwaram.

As each of these structures cost up to Rs 40 lakh each, the cash-strapped BBMP was reluctant. In Bommanahalli zones, temporary sheds were constructed in 12 wards. The temporary structure or sheds cost less than one lakh each and were built on the premise that the project would fail.

The construction of DWCC paced up when there was a furor over the garbage crisis in Bengaluru. The shutdown of the Mavallipura landfill site by the order of the Karnataka State Pollution Control Board threw the garbage crisis in the city spiraling out of control. Bengaluru was sinking in its own garbage.

Dry waste collection centre at Bommanahalli Sub Divison. Pic: Pinky Chandran

Design changes in DWCCs

This crisis also led to the famous Kavitha Shankar Public Interest Litigation filed in court for improvement in the solid waste management scenario in the city. Many other PILs were clubbed to this and the Karnataka High Court directed the State to implement segregation at source and set up decentralised waste processing (at a ward level), increase citizen involvement in the crisis by the formation of ward committees, revoking existing SWM contracts to retrofit to the new tender guidelines etc.

It was at this time that looking at the better designed Kasa Rasa centres, it was suggested that the BBMP look at more aesthetic, appealing and low cost structures and a prototype model costing about Rs 24 lakh was designed by Ravi Kumar, who was an architect by profession. However in the interest of quick roll out, the budget were lowered to about 10 lakhs and simple utility shed like structures were finally set up in 2013-2014.

The temporary structures in Bommanahalli. Pic: Pinky Chandran

Even though Bengaluru was the first to go ahead and have in place neighbourhood recycling centers, five years since the Lok Adalat’s directions the city has still not embraced DWCCs, segregation at source is still not being practised, acceptance from bureaucrats are still negative, considering that the DWCCs built have not taken into consideration expansion plans, many still lack facilities, or roofing is faulty, and integration of informal sector in managing the DWCCs only account for 4% of the total DWCCs in operation.


1. “On garbage contract cost analysis”, (2010)” SWMRT Submission to Lok Adalat, Bangalore

Citation: Chandran, P & Narayanan, S 2015 “A Working Observation on Dry Waste Collection Centers  in Bangalore: proceedings of the 5th IconSWM 2015,” International Conference of Solid Waste Management 25th -27th November 2015, Bangalore, ed. Ghosh, India, pp 104-112

Related Articles

Here’s how Dry Waste Collection Centres started functioning in Bengaluru

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Taking flight: Does Chennai need a second airport and at what cost?

Civic and environmental activists question the feasibility of the greenfield airport in Parandur and suggest expansion of Chennai airport.

Ten lakes, two streams, 3,500 acres of agricultural land, 1,005 families and hundreds of plant and animal species β€” these are all under threat because of one development project. There has been a considerable buzz regarding the Chennai Greenfield Airport set to come up in Parandur on the outskirts of the city. But, not all the noise is positive. Villagers in Parandur have been protesting for almost 700 days and some have even boycotted the Lok Sabha 2024 elections, asking the government to withdraw the project.   Yet, work is steadily progressing on the greenfield airport and the government is…

Similar Story

Explainer: Electrical components and ways to increase BESCOM sanctioned load

Here is an explainer on electrical system components and its maintenance, how to calculate sanction load and the process to increase it.

(Part 1 covered the components of BESCOM bill, tariff structure and sanction loads. Part 2 delves into electrical system maintenance) With the adoption of electric vehicles, owners are tapping into their existing meters to charge their vehicles, leading to electrical mishaps. If you need to connect a 3.3 kw/7.2kw EV charger, your sanctioned load needs to be enhanced. This leads to cable/wire, MCB (miniature circuit breaker) and RCCB (residual current circuit breaker) replacement, possibly the energy meter too may need to be replaced.  Overall, if every household enhances sanction load, this leads to constant tripping of the transformer and short…