“Forget BBMP, Bengaluru needs a strong metropolitan government instead”

Since BBMP is unfit to manage Bengaluru's problems, it should be replaced by a strong authority that governs the entire Bangalore Metropolitan region. This authority should include the chief minister, Bengaluru MLAs and MPs too, opines retired IAS officer V Balasubramanian

With its population growing at the rate of 4.45 percent annually, Bengaluru is now the largest city in India after Delhi and Mumbai. The city shelters about half of Karnataka’s urban population.

The administration of such a huge, expanding population calls for a structure with a holistic approach, which the BBMP (Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike) lacks.

An alternative administration that will overcome the shortcomings of BBMP and address the city’s issues, is the need of the hour.

An expanding city

Bengaluru has been expanding rapidly over the last three decades. In 1991, the then-BMP (Bangalore Mahanagara Palike) expanded to include 87 wards, and later to 100 wards in 1995.

In November 2006, state government dissolved the BMP council. Its 100 wards were then merged with seven City Municipal Councils (CMCs), one Town Municipal Council (TMC) and 110 villages around the city, to form a single administrative area. By April 2007, this area with 198 wards was renamed the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP).

The city continues to expand rapidly. By 2031, BBMP’s population is projected to be around 16.5 million, and its area is not expected to remain frozen at the current 780 square km. The adjoining taluks of Hosakote, Nelamangala, Devanahalli, Yelahanka, Doddaballapur, Bidadi-Ramanagara, are already urbanised. It is only a matter of a few years before they too would be absorbed into BBMP.

Hence, vital matters like water supply, solid waste management, transport and mobility, air and water pollution, flooding etc should be planned and efficiently executed for the Bangalore Metropolitan Region (BMR) as a whole. BMR comprises Bangalore Urban district, Bangalore Rural district (Devanahalli, Doddaballapura, Hoskote and Nelamangala taluks) and Ramanagara district. It is spread across 8005 sq km, and has population of over 12 million.

Restructuring cannot be done for the smaller BBMP area alone, or its five proposed fragments (BBMP has been proposed to be split into five municipal corporations, under a Greater Bengaluru Authority). Any restructuring by sub-dividing the BBMP, or by incorporating just the BDA area into BBMP, will not be a solution as the actual urban area has already crossed these limits.

Bifurcating, trifurcating or quartering BBMP into three, four or more territorial bodies will only worsen the macro-problems, and will not address the needs of the larger metropolitan region. Hence there is dire need for a more holistic, more administratively-competent and larger organisation with political authority, financial powers, administrative status, capacity and accountability.

Constituting the Bangalore Metropolitan Council (BMC)

On the model of the Greater London Authority, a Bangalore Metropolitan Council (BMC) should be constituted, with the jurisdiction of the entire BMR. It should have the ability to address the four major crises faced by the city’s population – the Four Horses of Bengaluru’s Apocalypse – water, traffic, garbage and air pollution.

By their very nature, these are huge problems, requiring large funds and planning. The planning, coordination and implementation of such projects cannot be confined to BBMP areas alone. These have to be dealt with in a holistic manner in the larger metropolitan region of 8005 square km, which is the actual urban area of Bangalore.

BBMP has neither the jurisdiction nor the capability to execute such projects. Hence, it is necessary to have a larger Bangalore Metropolitan Council (BMC), with a higher level of political accountability and administrative capability.

41 town councils in BMR

The BMR, and its administrative body BMC, will have 41 town councils or boroughs under it, such as Jayanagar, Cantonment, KR Puram, Yelahanka, Ramanagara, Devanahalli etc. (The Greater London Authority has 33 boroughs or local bodies, and does not have an equivalent of BBMP.) These 41 town councils will, within their respective jurisdictions, repair and maintain roads, parks, public places, along with public amenities including street lighting, burial grounds, parking lots, bus stops and public conveniences.

Town councils will also look into public health matters, maintain records of vital statistics including birth and death registrations, and attend to public grievances. Each of these town councils will have populations not exceeding a manageable five lakh.

Each will elect 10 councillors, who will then elect the president of their respective town council. As mentioned earlier, the primary function of town councils is of maintenance. They will not have large funds or contracts that give scope for corruption as in BBMP now.

BDA to be reconstituted as Planning Board

The BDA should be reconstituted as Bangalore Metropolitan Planning Board (BMPB) with a chairman of the rank of the Principal Secretary. The Board will include three experts, on contract from the Indian Institute of Science, IIM-B and a national body on town planning. It will also have three members elected by the BMC.

BMPB will prepare the region’s Draft Master Plan after an elaborate and mandatory consultation with citizens’ forums, as is the case in other metropolitan cities like the Seoul Metropolitan Government in South Korea.

BMC to have 120 members and a secretariat

The BMC, the overarching body that governs BMR, will comprise the presidents of all 41 town councils, along with all 36 Bengaluru MLAs and the chief minister. BMC will have 120 members overall, as discussed below.

  • The Chief Minister, who will be the chairman of BMC – 1
  • Presidents of 41 town councils – 41
  • MPs (six Lok Sabha MPs + eight Rajya Sabha MPs) – 14
  • MLAs – 36
  • MLCs – 21
  • Nominated experts – 7

The BMC should have higher status and a more accountable secretariat. It should be headed by a Chief Commissioner who is of the rank of the Additional Chief Secretary to government. He will be assisted by 10 Commissioners, of the rank of the Principal Secretary to government, who would head these departments:

  • Land and Finance
  • Transport
  • Waste Management and Environment
  • Culture and Education
  • Water and Sewage
  • Energy
  • Roads, Parks and Open spaces
  • Health
  • Industry and Commerce
  • Public grievances and Citizen participation.

BMC and its Chief Commissioner will supervise the Planning Board (BMPB). Similarly, the existing BESCOM, BWSSB, Pollution Control Board (for BMR area), Lake Conservation Development Authority, BMTC and the BMRCL will all work under the supervision of the BMC and its secretariat.

A legitimate complaint of Bengaluru citizens is that too many independent bodies have overlapping jurisdiction over the city, without any coordinating body to integrate and harmonise their work. These agencies often work at cross-purposes, and have no accountability. By bringing all of them under the BMC and its secretariat, the coordination of these bodies can be ensured.

Benefits of BMC

* Legal and administrative competency or political calibre to deal with civic problems

* Less chances for corruption
* Authority over multiple issues and the power to solve them

* Centralised planning in-sync with the state budgetary outlay

* Recovery of public land, including encroached lakes, will become easy
* Inclusive planning
* No jurisdictional problems
* More accountability  through MPs and MLAs
* Democratic representation
* High standard of administrative personnel

The BMC would help ensure that the nearly one lakh acres of public land under encroachment is recovered, and is used effectively for public purposes, housing, non-polluting industries etc. Much of the encroached land belongs to the Revenue Department, but is largely being misused by the rich and the powerful. Likewise, many lakes are encroached. These lands have much monetary and practical value for the government.

Bengaluru has 20 percent of Karnataka’s total population, 51 percent of its urban population, 40 percent of the state’s GDP, and it contributes to 65 percent of the state’s revenue. If the chief minister heads the BMC with 41 Town Council presidents, MLAs and MPs and a strong secretariat, the council will have enough power to ensure better administration of the expanding city. 

Else, with the present BBMP set up, the four impending calamities – water, traffic, garbage and pollution – will destroy the city. And Bengaluru is too big to fail.

[Disclaimer: This article is a citizen contribution. The views expressed here are those of the individual writer(s) and do not reflect the position of Citizen Matters.]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Fishers of Thiruvanmiyur Kuppam: Aborigines of the coast, not ‘Beach Grabbers’

Fishers of Chennai's Thiruvanmiyur Kuppam challenge encroachment claims, defending their long-standing rights amid coastal development.

The dispute between the fishermen and the more affluent, non-fishing residents of Thiruvanmiyur and Besant Nagar has simmered for years, highlighting tensions over land use, development, and livelihoods. Acting upon the complaint from the residents (non-fishers) in the locality, the GCC demolished the temporary constructions made by the fishers of Thiruvanmiyur Kuppam in June this year. Being less than 40 metres from the coastline, they were termed encroachments. A mainstream news outlet even referred to fishers' construction as ‘beach robbery,’ emphasising concerns that the illegal construction of houses and pathways could lead to the loss of turtle nesting sites and…

Similar Story

Bellandur Lake rejuvenation: An urgent call for action

Citizens have strongly disapproved the slow progress on Bellandur Lake's rejuvenation project. Immediate intervention is needed to avoid failure.

Bellandur Lake, Bengaluru’s largest water body, has been at the heart of an ambitious rejuvenation project since 2020. However, persistent delays, severe funding shortages, and inadequate planning have left citizens increasingly frustrated. Time is slipping away, and without immediate government intervention, this critical environmental project risks failing. A recent meeting with government bodies shed light on the project’s stagnation and the urgent steps required to salvage it. Progress so far Desilting Work: Of the estimated 32.33 lakh cubic meters of silt, 22.69 lakh cubic meters (70%) have been removed, leaving 30% unfinished Early monsoons and slushy conditions have delayed progress…