Court orders local disposal of waste in Bengaluru

As cities get bigger with more population, the volume of municipal waste is only going to increase. In this background, it makes sense to handle waste locally, and this order sets a precedent.

The Karnataka High Court in an order issued during the court hearing on Friday, November 10th, 2017, said that solid waste should be managed at the ward level in the city of Bengaluru.

This order was delivered by a bench of the Karnataka High Court in the ongoing case – WP 46523/2012 (Environment Support Group & Ors v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike & Ors connected with WP 24739/2012 and other Public Interest Litigations that are being heard by the Court since July 2012 in tacking the solid waste management crises).

Ward committees were constituted across all wards in Bengaluru, in October 2017. The High Court directed  that each ward committee meet by the end of November 2017 and prepare a ward level plan to ‘ensure proper solid waste management and sanitation work in the ward and finalise location of new public sanitation units’ as per the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

Ward committees are local committees comprising citizens in the ward, working in tandem with Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) to improve civic administration in the city. The High Court order on ward committees aligns with the 74th Constitutional Amendment (Nagarpalika) Act, 1992. The 74th amendment advocates decentralisation of power and devolving it to local bodies to guarantee direct public participation in civic matters.

Management of waste is a continuing crisis across big cities in India including in Bengaluru. Like in other cities, Bengaluru’s waste goes to different landfills in the cities, the largest of them being in Mavallipura. The unscientific dumping of waste in landfills poses serious health hazards to the communities residing in the vicinity. In addition, the environment also gets hugely polluted. The groundwater is heavily contaminated according to the communities which stay near the Mavallipura landfill.

As of now, in Bengaluru city, about 40 percent of waste is segregated at source as per the BBMP. The Municipal Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) mandates that all waste be segregated at source, which is certainly not the case across India.

Now, that the Karnataka High Court has issued directions on how the waste should be managed, BBMP should get its act together and prove so before the next hearing which will take place in the first week of November.

As cities get bigger with more population, the volume of municipal waste is only going to increase. In this background, it makes sense to handle waste locally. This order sets a precedent in this aspect.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

City Buzz: What ails the Data Protection Act? | Bengaluru’s bike taxi dilemma

All you need to know about the ongoing debate concerning the DPDP Act; and the uncertain future of bike taxis in Bengaluru.

DPDP Act sparks privacy vs transparency debate The Digital Personal Data Protection Rules (DPDP Bill 2025), drawn up by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), are designed to facilitate the implementation of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act), 2023. The DPDP Act, 2023, lays out guidelines for the collection, processing, and protection of personal data while ensuring individuals' privacy rights. The Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha in August 2023 and subsequently received assent from the President of India. However, the DPDP Bill has stoked a controversy over its ruling on the…

Similar Story

Give the poor homes or allow them to build? Ambedkar Nagar may hold the answer

The residents of the resettlement site in Chennai have made gradual upgrades to their homes, but are yet to get formal land titles from the government.

Across Indian cities, resettlement policies have often failed to provide long-term solutions for displaced communities, leaving them with insecure tenure, inadequate infrastructure, and limited growth opportunities. These challenges become even more apparent in resettlement schemes such as Chennai's Perumbakkam, where displaced communities were relocated into government-built apartments nearly 30 kilometres away. Antony, one of the first allottees of a plot in Chennai's Ambedkar Nagar, compares plots and apartments. He explains that having land allows gradual construction and improvements. "This is best. Here, with land, we can construct over time. There (in Perumbakkam), they cannot. There, even if they have money,…