Slum clearance: Why the government must go beyond displacement

As disturbing images of slum dwellers being evicted from Maduravoyal and Aminjikarai appear on media, a concerned citizen raises certain pertinent questions.

Over the past few days, we have been seeing some disturbing pictures of eviction of families from canal banks and sea side tenements. On September 9 and 15, 2015, hundreds of families were evicted from their homes in Maduravoyal and Aminjikarai respectively, with the promise of resettlement in Gudapakkam near Thirumazhisai and Perumbakkam.

I know that this is not an issue that resonates similarly even with my peers, most of whom see this as encroachment that needs to be removed. For the moment, therefore, let us set aside the question of justification.

The point that must nevertheless be considered is that over decades, these settlers had become legalised with proper postal addresses, ration cards, electricity connections, etc. Generations of them have been allowed to survive here, so that this is the only home they have.

Given these facts, we need to find sensitive solutions for these slums which occupy less than 5 percent of cityscape. Surely it is not so difficult  for the Government to do this in a phased manner, by developing a six-month programme to ease them into their new situation?

Some of the possible steps that come to mind in this regard:

  • Provide them all identity and other related documents in the new place, including ration cards, school admissions before moving them
  • Build data on current employment before moving them and find alternative employment or provide transportation facilities so that they can continue in their positions and reach their workplaces
  • Make the new place aspirational by creating a social atmosphere; create flexible job options through industry participation
  • Familiarise them with the new location through frequent assisted trips.
  • Create a welcoming committee in the new place which will ease them into the new surroundings. You could build host committees from existing residents who will take on the job
  • Focus on the children: Havie counsellors hand-hold them through a period of six months considering that evictions are being done mid-term.
  • Partner with NGOs that can bring in qualitative intervention

The most important requisite is of creating a living space that comes with all amenities of health care, education and job opportunities. Entertainment avenues and playgrounds are also a must.We cannot lead them into a ghost town.

Objections and reservations of the evictees must be heard and addressed. We have to believe that people will aspire to move if you provide them wholesome living.

And finally just two questions that are begging answers:

How do we justify the government action of creating 25000 apartments as part of slum clearance in a flood prone area, Perumbakkam, thereby moving them from one disaster prone to another?

Secondly, why is it so difficult to shut off or relocate residents’ complexes and workshops and factories that release untreated sewage into the canals with the same alacrity that is demonstrated in slum clearance?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…