Chennai Corporation elections: What can citizens expect from the elected council?

Citizen Matters and Janaagraha brought together candidates and civil society representatives to discuss the Feb 19th polls. Catch it here if you missed it.

As Chennai gets set for local body polls for the first time since 2011, many issues faced by the city and how an elected council might offer long-awaited solutions for the same, warranted a discussion. On February 14 2022, Citizen Matters and Janaagraha Center for Citizenship and Democracy brought together a diverse panel of candidates in the fray in this election and prominent voices from civil society organisation to delve into the complexities of local governance and how Chennaiites can hold the elected representatives accountable.

The panel was comprised of activist David Manohar of the corruption watchdog Arappor Iyakkam, Charu Govindan of citizens collective, Voice of People, S. Bharathi of the DMK, Candidate from Ward 153, Meera Ravikumar, Independent Candidate from Ward 173 and CN Paul Pradeep of MNM, Candidate from Ward 155.

panel discussion
Citizen Matters and Janaagraha put together a diverse panel to discuss the civic polls.

Batting for Votes

The candidates each made a short pitch on why they feel that they should be elected councillors of their respective wards.

Paul Pradeep stated that his motivation for contesting the elections had its roots in the disastrous Chennai floods of 2015. When his locality suffered the devastation caused by the floods, the local representatives were not available to come to their aid. Active youngsters in the area and NGOs were mostly engaged in rescue and relief. As a result of this, Paul decided to contest for the next local body elections. He stated that he has made great efforts to truly understand the scope and powers of the local body representatives and would leverage his knowledge for the common good.

Bharathi S of the DMK made her case based on the work that has been done by her and her party. She said that she has been a resident of the ward for many decades and is familiar with the day to day issues faced by the residents. She argued that the previous government had failed to improve civic amenities including providing good roads and improving waste management. She posited that since the DMK is the ruling party in the state and has carried out good work, people should put their faith in the party and her track record to vote for her.


Read more: Independent candidates to make a statement in the local body polls in Chennai


Meera Ravikumar said that independent candidates such as herself have improved the standard of discourse during the campaigns by talking about the real problems faced by the wards. She pointed out that there has been complete lack of transparency and accountability in local government. Residents are unaware of what projects are being carried out in their ward, who the contractors entrusted with the work are and how to raise their grievances; this has led to many issues mushrooming over the past few years. Meera hopes that her candidature will help turn attention towards improving transparency, pinning accountability and a greater voice for the residents in local governance.

ward committee meeting
The formation of ward committees and area sabhas has been a long pending demand in urban governance. Pic: Facebook/Voice of People

Citizen participation in local governance

Another key theme that was discussed by the panel was the need to create avenues for citizen participation. Srinivas Alavilli of Janaagraha shared the examples and learnings from Bengaluru and Mangaluru in setting up and operationalising ward committees where citizens can participate in the governance process.


Read more: What can Chennai learn from Kerala and Bengaluru on citizen participation in urban governance?


David Manohar of Arappor Iyakkam lamented that most political parties have not bothered to release proper manifestos that will help voters make an informed choice. He stated that having avenues such as ward committees and area sabhas will bring residents, officials and representatives to a common platform.

Charu Govindan of Voice of People reiterated their demand for setting up robust ward committess and area sabhas. She added that the responsibilities of Chennaiites doesn’t end with casting of votes but there should be a large movement that demands instutionalisation of ward committees and area sabhas once the election is over.

To follow the complete discussion:

Check out: Our complete coverage of Chennai local body elections

Also read:

Comments:

  1. Balaji says:

    While you hinted the pros and the luxury of having long-term tenure for counselors in chennai city in constrast of other cities like bangalore or mumbai, deeply pondering on this notion, allowed me to think the down-side of this. If a counselor doesnt perform well, citizen have the power to relect someone else. It is like notion of tenure-track position academicians are often given to prove themselves.
    Sharing my thoughts for individual contemplation 🙂

  2. Darbin Jacob says:

    Congratulations to Citizen Matters from bringing out the list of the new councillors ward wise.
    It would be appreciated if their ( councillors) respective Mobile nos, WhatsApp nos and mail id is also provided.

    Please keep up the good work you are doing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…