Building drains and filling potholes still not scientific

A lot of infrastructure that we have in the city is deliberately bad. Take the example of shoulder drains on roads. More than 200 years have passed since it was scientifically proven that water flows better in a cylindrical container than in a rectangular container (and it was known, empirically, even before the proof). So why do our ‘engineers’ in the city – with various titles – keep building rectangular shoulder drains?

Simple – because the cronies of the corporators who hijack these contracts are not competent enough to build anything else. All they know is to pour cement (and by the way, the cement they use for most drains is enough to support a full two-storey building). They don’t have any manufacturing facility to make cylinders, and they are certainly not the type for whom any self-respecting design professional would work.

The same thing with potholes. Tackling them as they develop requires some engineering capacity, but what we have is ‘friends with buckets’. All they know is to pour tar on various patches and stomp that with some neanderthal wooden board. In fact BBMP corporators even argued in council that ‘this is not at all hard work, anyone can do it’ as the reason to not turn pothole-management into a full-fledged city contract with engineering firms.

‘Anyone can do it’ is usually code for ‘I know a guy who should be given the contract to do it.’

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

We’re paying the price for digging holes around the ground we stand on

For years together, people talked about the 'demographic dividend'. Thanks to high fertility ratios in the past, a large number of young people would be entering the workforce, and we as yet don't have a very large aged population, so the ratio of workers to non-workers would be favourable. It would boost economic activity and taxes, and allow us to make investments in many public goods and services. This was not a bad picture to paint. But it had one important assumption - namely, that the young people entering the workforce would be skilled and productive. But we totally missed…

Similar Story

Of plumbers, slumber and economic development

If there's a leak in the water line in your building, you'll call the plumber. You won't call the carpenter and hope that by a combination of luck, brute force, learning-on-the-job, prayer, etc. he'll somehow get the job done. But when it comes to governance, we don't use this basic filter. We put the wrong people in charge of problem solving, and endlessly debate why they should be nonetheless able to solve them. They can't. The sooner we admit it the better. Structure matters. The internal capacity of organisations makes a difference. Being alert to larger trends and learning from…