Demystifying land ownership: Insights and expert advice for property transactions

Part 2 of the event report on property documentation covers Bengaluru property issues like the Khata conundrum, UPOR, RTC, BDA, etc.

Part 1 of the three-part event report series on property documentation covered the legal issues related to property documentation and the due diligence that new property buyers should follow. The queries were addressed by Mithun Garehalli, an advocate specialising in property law.

Part 2 highlights Mithun’s insights into the complexities of land ownership, the importance of understanding property history, and the need for expert advice in property transactions.

Khata quagmire

What is A Khata vs B Khata issue? 

A Khata is a document used for tax assessment in Bengaluru. It includes essential details such as the property owner’s name, site area, property number, location, and address. When someone refers to the Khata, they are essentially looking at the current property owner and the tax assessment associated with the property. The Khata provides insights into ownership and property dimensions.

Here is how it works:

  • If the property is within the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) jurisdiction, the Khata is issued by the BBMP
  • If the property lies beyond BBMP limits, it is issued by the relevant local authority (such as the panchayat)

The distinction between A Khata and B Khata

  • While there isn’t an official term called “B Khata,” it has become common parlance
  • Properties that have undergone tax assessment but may not comply with all legal requirements (such as lacking proper layout plans or conversions) are sometimes registered as B Khata
  • Recent judgments by the Honourable High Court of Karnataka suggest that there should be no strict distinction between A Khata and B Khata. If taxes are being collected, the property owner should receive an A Khata
excavations in a converted land
Illegal constructions under BBMP limits. Pic: Sandhya Bhat

Navigating property regularisation: Insights and challenges 

  1. Regularisation of unapproved layouts:
    • Many people have purchased sites from developers or individuals in unapproved layouts, which lack legal documentation (such as A Khata or E Khata)
    • The government has taken steps to address this issue by considering the regularisation of such layouts through betterment charges
    • However, further orders are awaited in this regard
  2. Previous efforts and legal challenges:
    • Previously, the Akrama-Sakrama subcommittee aimed to regularise unauthorised layouts Unfortunately, this attempt faced legal challenges
    • The Supreme Court stayed the regularisation process for certain buildings, leading to a halt in the initiative
  3. Focus on E Khata:
    • The government has abolished all other types of khatas (property registration documents) except for the E Khata
    • The E Khata must now be issued in accordance with the law
    • This move aims to streamline property transactions and enhance transparency
  4. Expectations:
    • With these measures in place, we hope that the regularisation process and property transactions will become more efficient and legally compliant

Having a valid khata is crucial for property transactions. Without it, the property’s marketability may be affected, and obtaining bank loans against it could become challenging.

Part XIV Of Penalties of the Registration Act 1908, gives penal powers to the Inspector General of Stamps and Registration: 

  • Section 82: Penalty for making false statements, delivering false copies or translations, false personation, and abetment
  • Section 83: Registering officers may commence prosecutions

Recently, the Inspector General of Stamps and Registration issued a circular delegating power to punish those producing fake documents, but implementation of these powers leave much to be desired.



Property ownership and the discrepancy between the owner’s claim and the information in the RTC (Record of Rights, Tenancy, and Crops)

  1. Khata property and BDA:
  • A Khata is a property account maintained by the local municipal corporation (such as BBMP in Bengaluru) for property tax assessment. It helps classify properties as either A Khata (residential or commercial) or B Khata (properties not fully compliant with regulations)
  • The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) is a government body responsible for urban planning and development in Bengaluru
  • If the RTC mentions the property as being under BDA, it might indicate that the BDA was involved in the acquisition or development of the land. However, this doesn’t necessarily mean it’s an issue. The critical factor is whether the property has been legally converted from agricultural land to non-agricultural land
  1. RTC and ownership claims:
  • The RTC reflects the ownership details, including the owner’s name. If the owner’s name matches the claim, that is a positive sign
  • However, discrepancies can occur due to historical reasons, court orders, or administrative changes. For example, land initially notified for acquisition might later be denotified, leading to inconsistencies
  • Sometimes, landowners obtain revenue entries to show that their land is excluded from acquisition proceedings. However, if the BDA challenges this, it can create confusion

(Part 3 of the series will deal with Apartment Associations Registration and Laws)

(Consulting legal experts or professionals experienced in property matters is advisable. They can guide you through the paperwork, legal requirements, and any specific provisions related to the land)

Also read:

Comments:

  1. Christopher Cruz says:

    Why does one need to have so many documents? Can’t they work towards one consolidated document for ownership?

    Why a buyer has to check all these records including mother deeds, this and that which become volumes of books by itself, then question is what is the registar doing and why do they charge in lakhs for property registration?? Is it not their duty to check all documents than just the sale deed & fees?

    Buying a property in India is a very complex process & even after registering it with all the fees, the registar is unable to certify that the property is free from any litigation for the new buyer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…