Why did BBMP and Urban Development Department apologise to Green court?

Karnataka government and BBMP say sorry to NGT for being presumptive about NGT's authority. But what about the conclusion - is the buffer zone rule applicable retrospectively? Should building sanctions - those given recently or are in progress, in the new buffer zone regulations be cancelled? The confusion has only increased.

Karnataka State Urban Development Department and the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) submitted an unconditional apology and undertaking in the National Green Tribunal (NGT) hearing held on April 19, 2017, promising to withdraw the circulars and letters that termed the NGT a ‘quasi-judicial body’.

This could affect the legalisation of hundreds of building plans, residential and commercial, that followed old buffer zone rules and got sanctions, some of them even before the NGT rule came into effect. The occupancy certificate and completion certificate may be hard to obtain, if the new NGT rule is applicable for all the projects that are in progress. It will also be difficult to get the plans sanctioned for the new projects in authorised layouts falling in new buffer zone, even though the layout and sites were authorised according to old rules.

The circulars by the Urban Development Department were clarifying the retrospective applicability of the NGT order on new buffer zone, but the Tribunal found the language unacceptable, and asked that the government bodies withdraw the entire clarification.

Urban Development Department’s botched up effort to clarify new NGT rule

When the NGT came up with the landmark new buffer zone rule in May 2016, almost entire real estate sector was under confusion. The builder affected directly by the rule, Mantri Techzone Pvt Ltd, had approached the Supreme Court asking for a stay on NGT order, but the Supreme Court did not stay the order.

After the Karnataka State’s legal department clarified that many of the NGT’s rules are applicable for all builders and all lakes, many builders approached the State Government asking for more clarification on specific cases. The State Government also approached the Supreme Court seeking more clarity, and the legal proceedings are on. Meanwhile, the government went back to seek legal opinion once again.

In a circular dated February 16, 2017 issued to BBMP, the Urban Development Department said that the Department sought legal opinion on following cases, with regard to NGT’s new no-development buffer zone order issued on May 4, 2016.

  1. Issuing of occupancy certificate and completion certificate and modified building plans, for the building plans that were sanctioned according to the old zonal regulation rules of 30 metre as buffer zone.

  2. The residential layouts that already have a development plan sanctioned by the BDA, where there are empty sites that are not yet developed, that fall in the buffer zone of 75-metres from lakes, 50 metres from primary drains, 35 metres from secondary drains and 25 metres from tertiary drains.

  3. The residential layouts falling in lake buffer zone, that procured no-objection certificate from the BDA before the NGT came out with new buffer-zone rule

The Legal Department had opined that since the National Green Tribunal did not specify that the buffer zone rules are going to be applicable retrospectively, the rules will be applicable only in the future. So, the above three cases will not fall under the new buffer zone rule specified by the NGT, and will not be considered illegal if the rules at the time of getting applicable sanctions have been followed.

Without stopping at that, the Legal Department went on to state this (translated summary from Kannada): “The NGT is a quasi-judicial body, and such tribunals have no power to frame laws. The NGT has never specified anywhere that the laws framed by the state government’s legislative body and plan sanctions accorded can be overruled by the NGT’s new rule. Therefore not allowing the construction to happen citing NGT order, for the building plans already sanctioned would become illegal.”

The circular thus concluded that the NGT order of new buffer zones is NOT applicable for the plan sanction applications for the sites in partially developed layouts sanctioned by a competent authority. Subsequently, the BBMP issued the same notice to all its officials, on March 30, 2017, for clarification.

Tribunal objects to language

During the hearing conducted on April 18, 2017, the Tribunal came down heavily on the State of Karnataka for clarifying the NGT’s May 4, 2016 judgment on lake buffer zones. “The Tribunal was distressed with the language used in the circular and fumed at the counsel representing State of Karnataka saying “by what authority have you clarified our judgment”, says a press note from Namma Bengaluru Foundation that brought the issue to the notice of the green court. The NGT also directed all the concerned officials who approved and issued the same to be present in the hearing held on April 19, 2017.

In the hearing conducted on April 19, 2017, the BBMP represented by Joint Commissioner Sarfaraz Khan and the Urban Development Department represented by principal secretary Mahendra Jain submitted affidavits tendering unconditional apology and undertaking to withdraw both the circulars with immediate effect.

The Tribunal said that it was not a quasi judicial body, but has been described as Civil court in the NGT Act. Any attempt to interpret the NGT orders in future, if not brought to the Tribunal’s notice, would be subjected to contempt proceedings before the Tribunal, and usage of “impertinent language” is not acceptable, warned the Tribunal, adding that the opinions expressed in the BBMP Circular and UDD letter are in complete contrast to the Tribunal’s judgment.

With this, the confusion on the NGT buffer zone rule continues to prevail even after almost an year of issuing it. Neither has there been any clarification by NGT on the retrospective effect, nor has the government been allowed to get legal clarification.

Court raps state govt, asks to shut industries, gives deadline for clean up plan

The National Green Tribunal issued an interim order on April 19, 2017, in the suo motu case on fire and froth in Bellandur lake, directing all industries in the vicinity of Bellandur lake to close down operations with immediate effect. The green court also banned dumping of municipal solid waste, domestic waste and construction waste in the lake and the buffer zone prescribed by the NGT. Such dumping and polluting is liable to environmental compensation of Rs. 5 Lakhs, said the Green Tribunal.

The court said no industry will be permitted to operate hereafter in the lake area, unless allowed by Joint Inspection Team(JIT). The joint inspection team has the power to seal the industries with the help of police and KSPCB.

The NGT also gave an ultimatum to clean the lake of all waste and pollutants, and carry out desilting, within one month, and said no more untreated sewage can enter the lake.

The NGT entrusted the responsibility of cleaning up the lake and ensuring the implementation of the order, to a committee headed by Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Karnataka Lake Catchment Development Authority (KLCDA) Commissioner Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA), and officials from the Urban Development Department (UDD).

The committee can induct any special agency for execution of this task. The state government can ask the developers around the lake to bear the cost of transfer of sewage. The state government needs to present the plan of action to completely prevent and control pollution in Bellandur Lake, before the Tribunal within a period of two weeks.

The NGT has been wielding its power to stop sewage from entering Bengaluru’s lakes, and has issued many such orders in the past, pushing the government to come up with concrete action plans. However, this time the Green court has given an ultimatum to the government. The case has now been adjourned to May 18, 2017.

The circulars to be withdrawn from BBMP and Urban Development Department:

[embeddoc url=”https://citizenmatters.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/BBMP-Order-2017.pdf” download=”all”]

BBMP Order (Text)

Related Articles

How govt helps SEZ trump Bellandur lake
Global NGO, engineering firms want to save Bellandur lake
In pictures: Bellandur lake’s fire and snow
The black sea of Namma Bengaluru: Bellandur lake in pictures
Stop sewage inflow into Bellandur lake soon, says Green court


  1. Venkata R S says:

    Dear Readers,

    As per NGT order regarding Buffer zone on 04-May-2016.

    – If the site owners has build the house in the 30- to 75- metre zone according to the norms of the day(04 May 2016) are legal and will not be affected in any way.

    – If the site owners who have not build the house till date in the 30- to 75- metre zone according to the norms of the day (04 May 2016) will not get House plan sanction from BDA / BBMP.

    – For example: In a BDA / BBMP approved layout where 50 sites are there in a row near to Drain, out of 50 sites, 45 site owners build the houses and 5 site owners are unable to build the house due to financial / personal problems till date – with respect to the NGT order 04 May 2016, BDA/BBMP is not going sanction the house plan to the 5 site owners in future.

    – How the NGT / Government are going to do justice to these 5 site owners? who have brought the site in approved BDA/BBMP layout by investing hard-earned savings and by taking loans in the bank, paying EMI, property tax every year to BDA/BBMP and unable to build the house till today.

    – If NGT / Government would like to maintain the 30 – to 75 meter buffer zone, I request, NGT / Government to acquire the site in the buffer zone by compensating site-owners as per Land acquisition Law or allow BDA/BBMP to sanction the house plan to these 5 site owners to build the house.

    Thanks & Regards,

    Venkata RS

  2. Siddhartha B says:

    Dear Venkata,
    Do you have any legal document to justify your above statements pertaining validation or non-validation of issued OC/CC? Are these your own views or interpretation OR mere a plea to the authorities involved? Please clarify!
    Many thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Mumbai floods once again. Will BMC’s climate budget help?

Experts say that BMC's recently launched climate budget needs to be more focused on urban flooding to be able to protect vulnerable citizens.

On July 8th, rains lashed Mumbai, disrupting regular life and causing waterlogging and floods in low-lying areas and on important routes. Central Railway officials mention that almost 900 train services were cancelled leaving several commuters stranded, while many BEST buses were diverted. Since then several incidents of heavy rains and flooding have been reported in the city. Commuters, civic activists and residents have questioned the claims made by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) about being prepared for the monsoons.  “The half-constructed, newly-built DP road number 9 in Chandivali was waterlogged, which caused inconvenience to commuters,” said Mandeep Singh Makkar, founder…

Similar Story

Mumbaikars get a taste of Murbad’s forest food and tribal culture

It was a treat for city dwellers to learn about wild vegetables and other forest foods harvested by tribal communities of Murbad, near Mumbai.

Throughout the year, vegetable shops and markets are stocked with select vegetables and produce that form our diets. This produce is grown in large scale farms and sold across the country despite geographic and seasonal variations. But 23rd June was an aberration for some of us, who spent time at the Hirvya Devachi Yatra. We got in touch with forest foods that grow in the wild, people who harvest them and make delicacies out of these.  The Hirvya Devachi Yatra was organised this year by the Shramik Mukti Sanghatana, Van Niketan, Ashwamedh Pratisthan and INTACH Thane Chapter. It has been…