BDA settles 112 cases in Lok Adalat

People from various layouts who visited the Lok Adalat were in for a disappointment when they found that their cases won't be heard.

Pic: Nikita Malusare

Bangalore Development Authority (BDA), in association with Karnataka State Legal Services Authority (KSLSA), conducted its second Rashtriya Lok Adalat at BDA headquarters in Bengaluru, aiming to clear cases pertaining to Arkavathy layout. Matters related to other layouts remained unheard.

The aim of the Lok Adalat was to resolve allotment or possession cases of BDA sites. Such an adalat would also minimise the need for citizens to approach courts and spend money on lawyers and face never-ending litigation.

At the inaugural function, Justice N K Patil, the judge of Karnataka High court pressed on the need to evolve a mechanism to dispose off the cases pertaining to Bangalore Development.

Justice L Narayanaswamy said, “This adalat will educate people about their rights and will serve them to address their disputes. The delay in disposing the cases itself is an injustice, which amounts to infringement of right to life.” He asked people to step forward and solve their issues and ask officials to discharge their duties fairly.

Around 346 cases were listed to be heard at three court halls in the BDA headquarters. Out of these, 112 cases were settled. Buyers were intimated beforehand via a letter. BDA Commissioner, T Shyam Bhat gave assurance that the cases taken up in the Adalat will be solved there itself and justice will be administered to the affected.

He said, “Among 8,813 sites in Arkavathy, 3,600 are litigation-free without any changes. In two days, 1,400 cases will be addressed. BDA will make efforts to address issues related to 5000 cases by this month. In the next month remaining cases will be taken up for hearing and try to make its disposal easy,” said Bhat.

The three courts were assigned to address different issues, such as the allotment of sites, allotment of alternate sites and Civic Amenity sites, allotment of khata or possession certificate, betterment charges etc.

Citizens unhappy

On hearing the news that BDA will be conducting Lok Adalat, allottees of other layouts whose sites have been under litigation flocked into the event with the hope that their long-pending issues will be solved. Little did they know, that they shouldn’t have been there. They called it joke adalat.

N Venkatesh, an engineer, had purchased a site in Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Layout almost eight years ago. His site was in a land caught up in the denotification scam- 2012. He said, “Lok Adalat is attending to issues which should be handled by BDA on daily basis. They are not solving major problems.” He has filed a writ petition in the High Court regarding this.

There were also other allottees of Thanisandra Layout present at the BDA office. A 63-year-old, A J Mohideen has been waiting for possession of his alternate, small 30 x 20 site for the last eight years. After a lot of try, he along with another purchaser had filed a petition in the court. His case couldn’t be attended today as the hearing was only for the Arkavathy layout. However, he was happy to know that he has been allotted a new site and the same was sent to him via post.

While to some lok adalat was a joke, some allottees of Arkavathy Layout heaved a sigh of relief.  After getting new sites, they were asked to submit their documents.

What type of cases can be heard at Lok Adalat?

Under section 7, section 10 and section 11(a) of Legal Services Authority Act, it is one of the functions of State Legal Services Authority to organize Lok Adalats. The decisions taken in the Lok Adalats are biding.

Lok Adalat attends cases related to public utilities. It can hear any case pending before a Court or any matter which falls within the jurisdiction of a court and any case which has not approached any court — that is under pre-litigation stage.

 A case or matter can be referred to Lok Adalat when

  • the concerned parties agree; or

  • one of the parties makes an application to the court, for referring the case to the Lok Adalat for settlement and if such court is prima facie satisfied that there are chances of settlement; or

  • the Court is satisfied that the matter is an appropriate one to be taken cognizance of by the Lok Adalat;

It does not have jurisdiction on matters relating to an offence not compoundable under any law.

Lok Adalat or permanent Lok Adalat shall, under the Legal Services Authority Act, have the same powers as a Civil Court, for the purpose of settlement or compromise, under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, while trying a suit in respect of the following matters.

  1. The summoning and enforcing the attendance of any witness and examining him on oath;

  2. The discovery and production of any document’

  3. The reception of evidence on affidavits;

  4. The requisitioning of any public record or document or copy of such record or document from any Court or office ; and

  5. Such other matters as may be prescribed.

However, Lok Adalat is empowered to dispose the case by compromise or settlement between the parties. A “compromise” means mutual adjustment. “Settlement” means termination of legal proceedings with consent of both parties. It can pass orders only when there is compromise between parties. Lok Adalat cannot issue directions or adjudicate the dispute.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…