BMTC commuters ask State to not hike bus fare

Should the BMTC hike public bus fares while the State is spending heavily on roads that will encourage private transport? Bus passengers write to the government, saying no to fare hikes.

In an attempt to get opinion from Bengaluru bus commuters regarding the State Government’s proposal to hike BMTC bus fares, several concerned individuals and groups held a ‘Post Card Campaign’ at the Shivajinagar Bus Stand, in Bengaluru recently.

Addressing the Chief Minister of Karnataka, H. D. Kumaraswamy, the groups spoke up against the disparity in transport planning in Bengaluru city. The groups sought support from commuters by signing on post cards that said, “I heard the government is planning to build Elevated Corridors while spending Rs. 33,000 crores. But, BMTC said they are raising fares since government is not supporting them financially. Can we please discuss how money is prioritised for transport projects? Please call for a public consultation to decide the same.”

Vinay Sreenivasa of Bengaluru Bus Prayanikara Vedike said, “The State Government is investing an obscene amount of money to build Elevated Corridors in Bengaluru. If a portion of that amount is utilized towards making the bus system better, the entire public transport system across the State can be made world-class”.

Madeena of Garment and Textile Workers Union urged the State Government to encourage public transport. “The Karnataka Government must support the BMTC financially, so that they don’t increase the bus fares which will help the working class in the city,” she said.

Babu, President of Bengaluru Jilla Beedhi Vyapari Sanghatanegala Okkuta said that the government is building Elevated Corridors to decongest roads in the city. “This city is well known for its traffic problems. The reason for traffic jams are cars and other private vehicles. The solution for traffic problems is to make public transport better and not make projects that will help more cars come on to roads,” he said.

Pic: BBPV

Prof. U Ramdas Rao, who took part in the campaign, said that the Chief Minister must not increase bus fares without public consultation. “Unless the government makes serious efforts to reduce the fares, Bengaluru is going to see worse traffic congestion, more pollution and a city only for the elite,” he said.

Tara Krishnaswamy of Citizens of Bengaluru said, “Our city will come to a grinding halt if not for the 6500 BMTC buses that carry 45 lakh people daily. It is about time the CM and the DCM call for public consultation to understand the perspective of bus passengers before signing off ₹35,000 crores on elevated corridor project that doesn’t help any bus user”.

As part of the ‘Post Card’ campaign regarding the proposed Elevated Corridors in Bengaluru, about 1,750 post cards have been signed. The campaign today was organised by the Bengaluru Bus Prayanikara Vedike, Garment and Textile Workers Union, Bengaluru Jilla Beedhi Vyapari Sanghatanegala Okkuta, Slum Janara Sanghatane, BBMP Guttige Pourakarmikara Sangha, Domestic Workers’ Rights Union, along with Citizens for Bengaluru.

Note: This press note was shared by Vinay Sreenivasa of Bengaluru Bus Prayanikara Vedike (BBPV)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…