BBMP notice to commercial units in residential areas: a primer

Why did BBMP issue notices to commercial establishments? How is it related to master plan? Many such queries answered.

Why is the BBMP issuing closure notices to commercial/non-residential establishments in residential areas?

The Revised Master Plan 2015 (RMP – 2015), the master plan in force amended in 2015, restricts non-residential uses of land in residential zones (so classified under the RMP 2015). As per the amended RMP – 2015,

1)    No commercial activities of whatsoever nature are allowed in any of the three Rings (of the Bengaluru Metropolitan Area) in Residential Main and Residential Mixed Zones if the road width is less than or equal to 40 feet.

2)    Ancillary usage (uses mentioned in the notification only) are permitted in residential main and residential mixed zones in Ring 1 and Ring 2 upto 20% or 50 sq mts whichever is lower provided the width of the road is above 40 ft.

3)    In Ring 3, ancillary uses (uses mentioned in the notification only) may be permitted as main use in residential main and residential mixed zones if the plot size is more than 1000 sq mts having frontage of 10 mts or more and if the width of the road is more than 60 ft.

The BBMP has now issued notices to establishments which violate the RMP – 2015.

What is the RMP – 2015? Is it binding on me?

The RMP – 2015 for the Bengaluru Metropolitan Area consists of a series of maps and documents setting out the vision and the framework for the development of the Bengaluru Metropolitan Area (Local Planning Area) and was approved by the Government of Karnataka on 22/06/2007”). As per the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 (“KTCP Act), every land use and development within an area covered by the RMP-2015 should conform to the provisions of the RMP – 2015, till the next revised master plan comes into force.

How do I know if I am permitted to put my land/building to non-residential use?

Any person wanting to develop/use a plot of land within the local planning area /Bengaluru Metropolitan Area has to first ascertain which ring (as categorised in the RMP – 2015) the plot falls within, thereafter which zone within the said ring and then the person can develop/use their plot as per the land use categories permitted in that particular zone under the RMP 2015 after obtaining appropriate approvals.

What are the ancillary uses permitted in plots abutting roads over 40 feet width?

Some of the ancillary land uses permitted are – Petty shops, newspaper, stationary and milk booth, STD/Fax/Internet/ATM centers, offices / clinics belonging to professional services categories and self owned, banks etc.

What was the judgment in W.P. No. 3676/2008 referred to in the notice of the BBMP commissioner?

During the year 2012, the High Court of Karnataka while hearing a writ petition challenging the vires of the Revised Master Plan 2015 (RMP – 2015) taking note of the problems faced by residents on account of commercial developments in residential areas, directed that in certain areas of the city corresponding to residential zones under the RMP – 2015, no permission would be given except for residential uses. The writ petition was ultimately disposed off after the State Government undertook to amend the RMP – 2015 as per certain proposals made by the BDA before the High Court.

The interim orders regarding restrictions on uses in residential zones however were to continue till the amendments to the RMP – 2015 were notified by the State Government. The amendments to the RMP – 2015 were finally notified by the State Government on 20/03/2015 and restricted non-residential uses in residential zones to a large extent.

What powers does the BBMP have if establishments do not comply with the RMP – 2015?

The BBMP has the power to shut down the establishment and also institute appropriate criminal proceedings against the violators.

Related Articles

RWAs say no to commercialisation on residential streets
Citizens win PIL on reckless commercialisation in Bengaluru
Permit for eatery in residential zone provokes protests, citizens cry harassment by BBMP

Comments:

  1. Mendumgudi says:

    commercial ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE 100% BANNED if any office or petty shops too should have specific CA site or govt land since there are no subsequent checks by BBMP. Many are running garages, and business without providing parking space in the building. If no parking no business should be the rule. Can this issue be taken up, neighbors are troubled due to BBMP circular on 40Ft wide road giving space for all corruption. Secondly no trade license are obtained by the shops or business houses which is very dangerous as many basements are used for hotel and bakery cooking and no NOC from fire department and pollution department

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Check how your MPs have performed in Parliament (and here’s why)

From 100% attendance to only 26%, how did your MP perform this Budget Session? See who is truly representing your voice in our MP Tracker.

When Ranjan Gogoi, the former Chief Justice of India, retired from the Rajya Sabha two months ago, his performance in Parliament became a matter of debate. As per an analysis by Livelaw, Gogoi did not ask a question to the government even once during the six years of his tenure and participated in the debate on only one Bill.  More recently, when seven AAP MPs defected to BJP, another analysis by Indian Express revealed that one of these seven defecting MPs, Harbhajan Singh, a former cricketer, had only 26% attendance.  Why do we typically go around digging data on the…

Similar Story

Deepening reservoirs, rainwater harvesting: Sustainable alternatives to the Mamallan dam

Why Mamallan reservoir? Experts say Chennai's water future lies in greener solutions — desilting old reservoirs and maintaining neglected tanks.

Ever since the contentious Mamallan reservoir was proposed in the ecosensitive Kovalam–Nemmeli backwater system, fisher communities in Chennai have repeatedly asked: Does it have to be here? Experts and scientists say no, urging the government to abandon the project and work on sustainable alternatives.  Critics point to a long list of costs: high expenditure, land acquisition, and risks to livelihoods and biodiversity. As we have reported earlier, the central concern driving the project is the looming drinking water supply crisis – demand is projected to rise from 1,100 million litres a day (MLD) to over 2,500 MLD for the Greater…