BBMP disobeyed HC order while releasing funds: Contractors, opposition

BBMP commissioner defends the decision, says only 20 crores were released. BBMP is yet to pay 3000 crore pending bills.

On November 30th 2015, Monday, soon after Bengaluru Mayor N Manjunath Reddy called off the monthly council meeting citing model code of conduct for Legislative Council election as the reason, opposition party leader Padmanabha Reddy hurriedly convened a press meet.

In his press meet, he accused the BBMP Commissioner and Chief Audit Officer of releasing Rs 179 crore for Programme of Works, violating the High Court and Karnataka government’s order to strictly follow seniority while clearing bills. The BBMP has released Rs 179 crore for works in different wards in K R Puram, RR Nagar and Yeshwanthpur legislative constituencies for works from various departments. When the Supreme Court has directed the BBMP to strictly follow seniority while clearing bills of contractors without succumbing to political pressure, how can the authorities release funds to clear the bills of these three constituencies? he asked.

He said this development happened in last one week’s time. He also wondered how the BBMP released such a huge amount when it has not yet cleared the pending bills of 2013 and 2014. The BBMP has been claiming of facing fund crunch. Yet they released the huge amount to the wards in selected three constituencies, he added.

“Apart from this, the authorities have also violated yet another circular issued during the Administrator’s period. The Administrator had made it mandatory for every work to be verified by Technical Vigilance Cell under the Commissioner (TVCC) before clearing the bills. But this procedure has not been followed while releasing Rs 179 crore,” he alleged.

Padmanabh Reddy demanded disciplinary action against the BBMP Commissioner and Chief Accounts Officer for their alleged involvement in the scam, failing which he threatened to move to the court.

In fact, the opposition leader went on to accuse the Mayor of calling off the monthly council meeting to save the face of the Commissioner. “They knew that I am going to raise this issue in the meeting today. The Commissioner is learnt to have requested the Mayor to call off the meeting,” he said.

‘Only 20 crore released’, says Commissioner

Meanwhile, a group of contractors, under the banner Working Contractors’ Association protested on BBMP premises and rounded up BBMP Commissioner Kumar Naik, demanding that the BBMP clear their pending bills running up to crores of rupees. “The bills should be cleared in seniority basis to help the small and medium contractors,” said Association President K T Manjunath.

BBMP contractors under the banner Working Contractor’s Association, stage a protest demanding to clear pending bills, in Palike premises on Monday. Pic: Akshatha M

Kumar Naik, after assuring them of solving their problems, was faced with questions from media persons. Responding to the allegation made by council opposition leader Padmanabha Reddy, the Commissioner said that the BBMP has released only Rs 20 crore for Programme of Works. “However, I will verify if something has gone wrong,” he said.

Meanwhile, he emphasised that as BBMP is financially not in a good condition, they are not taking new development works this year, but had reserved Rs 1,200 crore for clearing pending bills. Pending bills alone amount to Rs 3,000 crore, Kumar Naik clarified.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…