Bangalore is underserved, because it is undertaxed

Property tax rates are very low. Yes, I said low Smile I know it is not a popular thing to say, but it’s the truth. In Bangalore, we pay about 0.06 per cent of the value of a residential property in annual taxes, slightly more in some cases. In Seattle, just to pick a random point of comparison, the tax rate is between 0.8 and 1.1 per cent per year. That’s 14 to 19 times higher. Council tax in the UK is in the same range, maybe even higher.

There’s an old saying that if you pay less (peanuts) you’ll get a lot less too. In some ways that’s what’s happening to our cities.

It is politically difficult to raise any tax, and for that reason all the more important to make sure that tax rates are not allowed to drop too low in the first place. But in any case, since the rates are low now, we have to do something about it.

The usual push-back against higher taxes is that ‘we already get bad service from the BBMP. Nearly everything is bad, so why should I pay more?’, along with ‘more taxes will only lead to more corruption’ or ‘let them first collect the property tax from all properties, which has itself not happened’. These are valid, and real challenges, and I won’t deny that. But at the same time it is true that without a higher infusion of money into the city, there is no way we can expect it to look anything like a developed place.

It will be tempting to say that the State government should foot the bill. I have myself argued in the past that the State should give 6000 crores per year to BBMP, and correspondingly higher money to every other city and village in the state too. But this is just mechanics. Tax money is tax money, whether it’s cycled around from the state, or collected at the council level.

We must confront and overcome the truth, which is that we are under-served because we are under-taxed. Somehow, deep within us, we have to find both the resolve to invest in ourselves and the clarity to understand tell which is the horse (taxation) and which is the cart (development).

Comments:

  1. Naveen Patil says:

    Can we instead compare it with some Indian cities?
    Delhi/Chennai/Hyderabad …I guess are better tax managed in many ways.

  2. Abhay Dixit says:

    Before increasing taxes BBMP shoudl ensure that all taxes are collected and used properly. Abhay DixitOnce this is done, we will know the real shortfall. BBMP is uncommunicative. What stops BBMP from publishing/giving info on various operations. It should be done in small slices (say half coloumn) every week. This should have quantitative as well qualitative data. Is BBMp interested in becoming accountable?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…