Bangalore is underserved, because it is undertaxed

Property tax rates are very low. Yes, I said low Smile I know it is not a popular thing to say, but it’s the truth. In Bangalore, we pay about 0.06 per cent of the value of a residential property in annual taxes, slightly more in some cases. In Seattle, just to pick a random point of comparison, the tax rate is between 0.8 and 1.1 per cent per year. That’s 14 to 19 times higher. Council tax in the UK is in the same range, maybe even higher.

There’s an old saying that if you pay less (peanuts) you’ll get a lot less too. In some ways that’s what’s happening to our cities.

It is politically difficult to raise any tax, and for that reason all the more important to make sure that tax rates are not allowed to drop too low in the first place. But in any case, since the rates are low now, we have to do something about it.

The usual push-back against higher taxes is that ‘we already get bad service from the BBMP. Nearly everything is bad, so why should I pay more?’, along with ‘more taxes will only lead to more corruption’ or ‘let them first collect the property tax from all properties, which has itself not happened’. These are valid, and real challenges, and I won’t deny that. But at the same time it is true that without a higher infusion of money into the city, there is no way we can expect it to look anything like a developed place.

It will be tempting to say that the State government should foot the bill. I have myself argued in the past that the State should give 6000 crores per year to BBMP, and correspondingly higher money to every other city and village in the state too. But this is just mechanics. Tax money is tax money, whether it’s cycled around from the state, or collected at the council level.

We must confront and overcome the truth, which is that we are under-served because we are under-taxed. Somehow, deep within us, we have to find both the resolve to invest in ourselves and the clarity to understand tell which is the horse (taxation) and which is the cart (development).

Comments:

  1. Naveen Patil says:

    Can we instead compare it with some Indian cities?
    Delhi/Chennai/Hyderabad …I guess are better tax managed in many ways.

  2. Abhay Dixit says:

    Before increasing taxes BBMP shoudl ensure that all taxes are collected and used properly. Abhay DixitOnce this is done, we will know the real shortfall. BBMP is uncommunicative. What stops BBMP from publishing/giving info on various operations. It should be done in small slices (say half coloumn) every week. This should have quantitative as well qualitative data. Is BBMp interested in becoming accountable?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…