Bangalore is underserved, because it is undertaxed

Property tax rates are very low. Yes, I said low Smile I know it is not a popular thing to say, but it’s the truth. In Bangalore, we pay about 0.06 per cent of the value of a residential property in annual taxes, slightly more in some cases. In Seattle, just to pick a random point of comparison, the tax rate is between 0.8 and 1.1 per cent per year. That’s 14 to 19 times higher. Council tax in the UK is in the same range, maybe even higher.

There’s an old saying that if you pay less (peanuts) you’ll get a lot less too. In some ways that’s what’s happening to our cities.

It is politically difficult to raise any tax, and for that reason all the more important to make sure that tax rates are not allowed to drop too low in the first place. But in any case, since the rates are low now, we have to do something about it.

The usual push-back against higher taxes is that ‘we already get bad service from the BBMP. Nearly everything is bad, so why should I pay more?’, along with ‘more taxes will only lead to more corruption’ or ‘let them first collect the property tax from all properties, which has itself not happened’. These are valid, and real challenges, and I won’t deny that. But at the same time it is true that without a higher infusion of money into the city, there is no way we can expect it to look anything like a developed place.

It will be tempting to say that the State government should foot the bill. I have myself argued in the past that the State should give 6000 crores per year to BBMP, and correspondingly higher money to every other city and village in the state too. But this is just mechanics. Tax money is tax money, whether it’s cycled around from the state, or collected at the council level.

We must confront and overcome the truth, which is that we are under-served because we are under-taxed. Somehow, deep within us, we have to find both the resolve to invest in ourselves and the clarity to understand tell which is the horse (taxation) and which is the cart (development).

Comments:

  1. Naveen Patil says:

    Can we instead compare it with some Indian cities?
    Delhi/Chennai/Hyderabad …I guess are better tax managed in many ways.

  2. Abhay Dixit says:

    Before increasing taxes BBMP shoudl ensure that all taxes are collected and used properly. Abhay DixitOnce this is done, we will know the real shortfall. BBMP is uncommunicative. What stops BBMP from publishing/giving info on various operations. It should be done in small slices (say half coloumn) every week. This should have quantitative as well qualitative data. Is BBMp interested in becoming accountable?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…