Should elected reps be granted a free pass into clubs? No!

There are two separate issues in the Bangalore Club case, which the government is now trying to tackle through a law. And of the two, only one is legitimate.

The first issue is whether Indian dress code should be disallowed from any premises, even a private one. I don’t think so. It’s not nice, and some would say it seems undignified. Possibly. But if a private group wants to set up rules for its own members, and they’re all ok with it, I wouldn’t lose any sleep over it. By the same token, if the government wants to wage war on such a group, it’s their own lookout, and I wouldn’t lose sleep over that either. 

The second is whether MLAs, MPs, and other elected representatives should be automatically entitled to membership in a private club. That one is a big stretch, and the answer is clearly ‘no’. Being a lawmkaer gives someone membership into the law-making body, and it is not one of the privileges of that body to be granted a free pass into any institution that its members want to be part of.

There is more public support for the first issue, but zero support for the second one. Which may be why the two have been clubbed together – to get the second one in the name of the first.

The irony is also that long-standing issues in development are pending the attention of lawmakers for years, but distractions like club memberships and resorts seem to have no trouble getting on the radar.

Related Articles

Rajvir vs Bangalore Club: Is there a lesson from such incidents?

Comments:

  1. N V Krishnakumar says:

    If only you had told the truth to your readers they would have come to a different conclusion. These elite clubs are corrupt to the core, taxpayers pay for their subsidized liquor and have been paying off Inspectors for survival. Century Club has violated every rule of Cubbon Park, Bangalore Club has no title to their land and has been operating bars without proper liquor license. And other clubs …..

    In a country where law applies equally to everyone, they would have either been shut down or imposed humongous fines that they would have been bankrupt by now.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Karnataka SIR 2026: Top FAQs and community concerns addressed

As the SIR is underway and voter forms are distributed, much confusion remains about how to fill them. Here are some FAQs to understand the process.

As of July 8, booth level officers (BLOs) have distributed over 4.57 crore enumeration forms for the mandatory Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Karnataka. Yet despite the 82.45% completion rate, the process has faced widespread criticism and been plagued with problems including BLO burnout, and the Kannada-only forms. If you are still figuring out how to fill the enumeration form, read Part 1 of this series. In this part, you can find answers to some common questions on filling the form, online enumeration, progeny mapping, etc. The SIR process poses specific challenges to transgender and queer communities due to changes…

Similar Story

SIR for Karnataka voters: All you need to know about enumeration 

Voter verification requires linking your 2025 rolls to your 2002 records. Here's how you can fill the forms and register.

Karnataka's Special Intensive Revision (SIR), which began on June 30, requires every voter to complete a fresh verification exercise. The SIR is carried out by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to prepare and revise electoral rolls, and ensure its accuracy. The process especially aims to remove deceased voters and duplicate names in the rolls, including those of  citizens who have migrated and are registered as voters in  multiple places. The election commission announced the process with the aim that ‘no eligible citizen is left out and no ineligible citizen is included in the electoral roll’. In the Special Summary…