13,000 to 15,000 buses – that’s what Bengaluru needs right now!

“Better than nothing” is not progress. It’s just better than nothing. If we set our metrics so low, we can never develop.

Take the example of buses. The city needs about 13,000 to 15,000 buses to reach the kind of service levels that are seen in places with excellent bus service globally (1,250 buses per million of population). Also, each year, as the population grows, the fleet strength has to grow by about 200-300. That’s the need.

The actual fleet strength now is 6,500. And each year, 600 buses are scrapped, so these need to be replaced to keep the fleet strength even at 6,500. And another 300 need to be added to keep the service efficiency at current levels, given the rising population.

Together, these mean two things. One, we need another 8,000 buses to bring the service levels to what they need to be, and make a meaningful dent on private transport use. And two, we need to add 900 buses a year to remain at least at the current low levels of service.

Doing both will surely help. Keep in mind that half the city travels by 6500 buses daily, and the other half travels by 55 lakh private vehicles. It’s a no-brainer to keep strengthening the public transport options.

Repeated efforts by almost everyone who has thought about public transport to increase the fleet strength over 10,000 have not yielded any result. Incredibly, governments that say they are worried about traffic congestion and air quality have not acted on the single most important thing they can do to address these problems – improve the supply of public transport.

Alongside this come the occasional announcements, like “we are going to add 600 buses now” or “1,600 buses” this year”, etc. Frankly, given the production schedules and capacities of manufacturers, even if we announce an addition of 1,500 buses, it takes two years or more to actually induct them into the fleet. And while we are celebrating this step, we seem to forget that the actual demand for new buses is 1,800 over two years, so by adding 1,500 we’ll actually fall behind compared to where we are.

We have to look at the NEED to decide whether we are doing enough. Otherwise, we simply end up with “better than nothing”. And that comes at a terrible cost.

In other sectors, the problem is even worse. Housing, education, healthcare … these need to be made affordable for a lot more people, but the gap between supply and demand in those is so vast that no one is even trying to address them anymore. We’re like ostriches with our heads in the sand, hoping that the world we don’t see doesn’t exist. And the poor in our society live with the needless suffering that this produces.

Related Articles

10 reasons that discourage me from travelling in BMTC buses
Stage distance <2km: BMTC ends up charging higher ticket fare
A to Z of using BMTC buses
BMTC: A saga of no profit, hiked fares and troubled commuters
BMTC’s new year gift to Bengaluru: Intelligent Transport System
So when are you starting to travel regularly by BMTC bus?

Comments:

  1. Blore citizen says:

    Well, your suggestion is downright dangerous, if done alone. Have you thought about
    1. Traffic congestion it may cause ?
    2. Have you seen low occupancy levels across BMTC fleet ?
    3. Have you seen the size of the BMTC buses even on narrow 1-lane roads ?

    While I agree public transportation is the ONLY solution for a high-dense city like B’luru, your suggestion to just increase fleet has to be in tandem with

    1. Congestion & Registration tax to discourage private vehicles
    2. BMTC doing everything possible to improve its occupancy at all times
    a. which could mean running minibuses at off-peak times
    b. BMTC should improve last mile connectivity by Tata winger-type vans for narrow, internal roads
    c. BMTC fares should be lowered further esp AC bus

    Here was my open letter to Ekroop Caur , CEO of BMTC

    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P-3usET9vXTK8qcvVJRS5zLRC9eJlTKJQyVizvUhfpE/edit?usp=sharing

    Open letter to Transportation minister with actions to take before June 2016
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/19FnyLd6JzQpJHvnr0MqromaenS7vivjCOHg13OCpgZ4/edit?usp=sharing

  2. Blore citizen says:

    you can see more of my ideas here http://forabetterbengaluru.blogspot.in

  3. Vishwas says:

    While these suggestions make total sense – who in government will listen to them, let alone act on them? Which (Indian) government service can keep track of demand and provide services to be responsive to that demand? BMTC resources are massively mis-allocated – you see ORRCA Volvo buses which are half empty, but refuse to pick up anyone else while plodding along next to it is an ordinary bus with standing room only on the foot board. Let the market work! Private services like zipgo, should be allowed and regulated. It has become a situation of “BMTC will not do anything to ease the situation of commuters and neither shall we allow anyone else to remedy the situation”. Perhaps it is time to take this government to court by a public interest litigation and force them allow private carriers in Bangalore.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…