Dear Bangalore Blue Print Action Group, this is not the way to plan the city!

Dear members of civil society, who are the members of the newly formed Bangalore Blueprint Action Group,

I am writing to you today because, like you, I care about Namma Bengaluru and I want its governance to improve. And I believe every one of us in the city can make a difference to its future.

First, I am happy that the Government values your advice. The input of people who have both ideas and passion for the city should always be welcome in government. Many of you have a track record of interest in the welfare of the city, and therefore I see it as a good thing that your input is being solicited.

However, in your appointment to the Action Group, there is one glaring oversight. The law, as you all know, requires the planning of the city to be carried out by a Metropolitan Planning Committee, duly constituted in accordance with the 74th Amendment Act.

In such a situation, it is not right to have the functions of the MPC being carried out by other entities outside the constitutional framework.

In the past, many of you have been strong supporters of the MPC. In your own recommendations to governments and reforms commissions, the MPC finds mention. Many of you have served in positions explicitly designed to bring about constitutional and administrative reforms.

Against that background, it would be improper to be part of the Action Group.

At the same time, as I said earlier, I value the inputs that many of you can bring to the government. The way to achieve this is for you to be members of the MPC itself, and bring about the needed changes through legal institutions of governance.

Please also recall that extra-constitutional bodies tend to be limited to the life of the governments that appoint them. Both ABIDe and BATF died with the governments that set them up. Whereas what the city needs is PERMANENT intervention for improvement through the MPC.

It is also particularly worrying that the Action Group has been constituted without including the Mayor of the city. Surely that is undemocratic. The partisanship of governments cannot decide the legitimacy of role-play. We must work with each other, even when we disagree.

For these reasons, I urge you to advise the government to nominate you to the MPC instead, and disband the Action Group. I would be delighted to see you as a member of the MPC, and will gladly help in whatever way I can to help make that institution strong and lasting.

With affection and regards,
Ashwin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Karnataka SIR 2026: Top FAQs and community concerns addressed

As the SIR is underway and voter forms are distributed, much confusion remains about how to fill them. Here are some FAQs to understand the process.

As of July 8, booth level officers (BLOs) have distributed over 4.57 crore enumeration forms for the mandatory Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Karnataka. Yet despite the 82.45% completion rate, the process has faced widespread criticism and been plagued with problems including BLO burnout, and the Kannada-only forms. If you are still figuring out how to fill the enumeration form, read Part 1 of this series. In this part, you can find answers to some common questions on filling the form, online enumeration, progeny mapping, etc. The SIR process poses specific challenges to transgender and queer communities due to changes…

Similar Story

SIR for Karnataka voters: All you need to know about enumeration 

Voter verification requires linking your 2025 rolls to your 2002 records. Here's how you can fill the forms and register.

Karnataka's Special Intensive Revision (SIR), which began on June 30, requires every voter to complete a fresh verification exercise. The SIR is carried out by the Election Commission of India (ECI) to prepare and revise electoral rolls, and ensure its accuracy. The process especially aims to remove deceased voters and duplicate names in the rolls, including those of  citizens who have migrated and are registered as voters in  multiple places. The election commission announced the process with the aim that ‘no eligible citizen is left out and no ineligible citizen is included in the electoral roll’. In the Special Summary…