Stop allowing builders from becoming ‘agents’ who hoard black money!

BBMP, BDA, BESCOM, BWSSB, and other organisations should stop the practice of accepting deposits and payments from developers on behalf of home owners. Instead, they should set up a system by which the home owners can directly make the payments themselves, hassle-free.

The current practice is leading to an ocean of black money.

(a) Monies collected from home owners is often not paid at all to the utilities.

(b) Monies collected from home owners is often far in excess of what is due to be paid to the utilities.

(c) When money is not paid, the home owners are left without any options for demanding khata, power connection, water connection, sewerage service, etc.

(d) The government has no effective way of reining in builders who do not pay the monies they have collected.

All of this happens only because builders are allowed to act as ‘agents’ of the ‘principals’ – the actual owners. That’s not necessary at all.

The practice persists because the procedure for making the payments is – and is perceived to be – full of hassles, and very opaque. Therefore when someone steps forward to ‘get it done’, people go with that, thinking this will make their lives easier. If the agencies themselves take steps to make these processes easier, the middlemen will become unnecessary.

(I realise that even now, these things can be done w/o middlemen, and some people do get these done themselves, but only a small number of them have reported a favourable experience while doing so. Most who do it themselves are doing so at great pains to themselves, and out of their determination to keep things honest)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…