If you don’t have your name on BBMP voter list, check it again!

Voter roll analysis expert P G Bhat says in his blogpost that finally State Election Commission and Chief Election Officer, Karnataka have synced their voter rolls and around 5,00,000 applications have been approved, and deletions made.

Voter roll analysis expert P G Bhat says in his blogpost that finally State Election Commission and Chief Election Officer, Karnataka have synced their voter rolls and around 5,00,000 applications have been approved, and deletions made. This means that you can check your name on voter list and go to polling booth with any accepted id card for voting.

In his blogpost on his blog PG’s Pensive, he explains it all:

State Election Commission (SEC), an organ of the state government, is responsible to conduct local body elections. Thus, it does not enjoy autonomy like Election Commission of India(ECI). Rules and policies of SEC are not well documented. Practices are arbitrary.

SEC borrows a dump of electoral rolls database from Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) and reorganises the records to suit local government elections like that of BBMP. All the legacy errors in the rolls maintained by CEO are inherited by SEC. In response to a mail to SEC reporting the errors in the rolls, he responded that CEO is responsible for the quality of rolls. CEO had written earlier that errors and omissions in the rolls used by SEC are not CEO’s responsibilities. None between the two wants to be accountable.

Staff maintaining the electoral rolls and helping in the conduct of elections are the same for CEO and SEC. When new registrations, deletions, or corrections are made to voter lists, they are updated in CEO’s repository. If SEC does not synchronise his repository with that of CEO, data completeness suffers. Voters querying at SEC website would be confused and frustrated.

While SEC has not clearly documented policies and procedures for maintenance of electoral rolls, we find two major deviations from ECI policies, followed by the CEOs of all the states and union territories:

    • ECI policies state voter lists as open documents. In Jan 2013 when CEO-KA imposed CAPTCHA and also made electoral rolls as image files, ECI instructed him to remove the access restrictions and to publish them as pdf text files. Now SEC has put CAPTCHA control and also published the rolls as image files. Thus, it is not possible to even search a voter name in the document. There has been no response from him for repeated mails with requests to publish the electoral rolls as pdf-text files and to remove CAPTCHA.
    • CEOs freeze the rolls ten days before the last date for withdrawal of nomination. SEC has massively updated his voter lists on 18th, just 4 days before the scheduled date of BBMP elections.

Unacceptably poor data quality of the rolls in CEO-KA voter lists are inherited by SEC.

On 06 August I wrote to SEC, CEO, and Commissioner of BBMP that more than 99% of the voters registered since 01 Feb 2015 are not included in the BBMP voter lists. Again on 13 August I wrote about exclusion of registered voters from the electoral rolls. When there was no response to these mails, on 15 Aug I wrote to the chief minister, with copy to High Court of Karnataka, SEC, CEO, and Commissioner of BBMP, requesting to include the newly registered voters in the rolls.

By 17 August, more than 5,00,000 registration request were approved, but not included in BBMP electoral rolls, though added to the CEO’s voter database. Similarly about 60,000 requests for deletion were approved and deleted from CEO’s voter database, but continued to appear in SEC database.

In a press conference on 17 Aug, held by B.PAC, I highlighted this issue again.

On 18 August we see that the approved voters are included in BBMP rolls and deleted ones are removed. We are glad about it. I cannot claim that more than these actions were due to my intervention. It is true that they were not in the rolls till 17th August and I have been trying to get the names included. There is a response in action though the authorities did not communicate with me.

All is well that ends well. I hope it is the beginning because this journey would be long.

So, if you haven’t seen your name on voter list, it is time to check again – so that you can vote tomorrow. Hopefully you might have been included in the voter list now. Here’s the guide to help you out.

 

Related Articles

All set to vote in the BBMP Elections 2015? Here’s a quick guide for you
Affidavits of BBMP election candidates from 84 wards of Bengaluru
BBMP Elections 2015: Special coverage by Citizen Matters
On the trail of the great Bengaluru election tamasha!
Less educated, but stinking rich: Will this be the new set of BBMP corporators?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Making the invisible visible: Why Bengaluru needs effective groundwater monitoring

Ten assessment points in Bengaluru are over-exploited for groundwater, while government bodies lack the resources for effective monitoring.

Monitoring groundwater level is like keeping a tab on your income and expenses—if you are spending more, it is a warning sign. You can cut down spending or find ways to earn more. Similarly, a city must decide whether to reduce extraction in certain areas or improve recharge methods, such as rainwater harvesting, wastewater treatment, or preserving open spaces. So, does Bengaluru have enough groundwater monitoring systems? While a WELL Labs report estimates the city's groundwater consumption as 1,392 million litres a day (MLD), BWSSB’s groundwater outlook report states that the extraction is only 800 MLD. This suggests a significant…

Similar Story

Odisha’s Jaga Mission upholds a model for empowering grassroots urban communities

The Jaga Mission shows the path to institutionalised, decentralised participatory governance through three main areas of intervention.

As Odisha’s Jaga Mission progressed, the vision expanded from developing slums into liveable habitats with the active participation of the community, to developing the upgraded slums as empowered units of hyperlocal self-governance. The highlights of participatory slum transformation were discussed in the first part of this series. Taking forward the idea of collaborative problem solving, the Mission now sought to put in place systems to institutionalise decentralised participatory governance in the upgraded slum neighbourhoods. The objective was to transfer the management of neighbourhoods, encompassing the 4 lakh slum households across 115 cities in the state, to the Slum Dwellers Associations…