High Court to pronounce judgment on BBMP election on April 24th

BBMP election controversy has reached the final stage in the court of law. All eyes are set on the judgment that will be pronounced on Friday, April 24th.

Karnataka High Court will decide on the schedule of council elections for Bengaluru. Pic: Poornima Dasharathi

The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka which has completed the hearing of the State government’s appeal against the Single Bench order to conduct BBMP polls before May 30th, has posted the judgment to April 24th, 2015. The court also extended the interim stay refraining the State Election Commission (SEC) from continuing the election procedures till the verdict.

During the day-long hearing that took place on April 22nd, the division bench sought to know from the petitioners and the respondents if the six months outer limit to hold the election after dissolving the council is applicable to before the end of five year’s council term or even after the term ends.

While the Advocate General representing the government argued that the six months period to hold the election after dissolving the council could be even after the end of five years term of the council, counsels appearing for the State Election Commission argued that six months outer limit was applicable only before the end of term.

Senior counsel Sajjan Poovaiah who argued on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on behalf of Namma Bengaluru Foundation (NBF) on the same issue too stressed that the constitution gives the right to the citizens not to be deprived of the elected council after the end of the elected body’s term. “The five year election cycle can not be disrupted,” he stated, adding that it might set a precedent for other governments to use dissolution as a tool to postpone elections.

When the judges asked the government to submit the timeframe within which it would be ready for the election, Advocate General assured of holding the election within six months as per the constitutional provision, soon after the completion of BBMP restructuring, delimitation and reservation of wards.

The SEC counsel requested the court to allow them to conduct the election on time in accordance with the Single Bench order. The SEC has completed the election preparations, and only declaring the election schedule is pending. The counsel also revealed that the Commission had issued 15 notices to the government in last two years to supply reservation roster, but the government neither responded to any of the notices nor sent its representatives to participate in election-related meetings.

Judges see lack of genuine intent

Both the judges pointed out at the presence of an ulterior motive behind the government dissolving the BBMP council only when two days were left for the election term to end. “You dissolved the council two days before the term ends, purposefully so that you can get six months time to hold the next election. Why didn’t the government commence the process of restructuring, delimitation of wards and reservation well in advance? Can this provision of dissolution be made use for a situation like this? The Supreme Court has time and again directed to the Election Commission to complete election on time to avoid vested interests who try to prevent timely polls,” opined Justice Ram Mohan Reddy.

Advocate General defended the government’s decision and said that dissolution decision was taken based on Kataria committee report on BBMP irregularities. To this, Chief Justice D H Waghela asked why the government formed the committee when only a month was left for the BBMP council term to end hand why it did not form the committee to probe into irregularities a few months ago.  “It is a man made calamity and we see lack of bona fide intent on the part of the government,” the Chief Justice observed.

Related Articles

HC stays declaration of BBMP election temporarily
HC pushes for restoration and rejuvenation of Agara and Bellandur lakes
BBMP ward reservation list quashed, SC upholds HC order

Comments:

  1. Raja Seevan says:

    Indian CST launches GPMS cloud mobile apps for every Indian citizen who want to download this android app just by clicking the link http://vigeye.org/ce.php from their mobile phone and install it. Then use it for updating their KYC documents or submit complaints along with photo, audio, video, files online from any for their location from their mobile phone…We request citizens to come forward and support the initiative.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…