MP, MLA, Corporator enough, no need for fourth rep: R Ashoka

Transport Minister R Ashoka said this in response to being pressed on his party’s position on ABIDE’s proposal to have local areas within wards elect citizens into a ward committee chaired by the elected councilor.

Even as the Karnataka State Election Commission has announced the BBMP council elections schedule, one court case on ward reservation is pending at the Supreme Court. Alongside, the Chief Minister’s ABIDe (Agenda for Bengaluru Infrastructure Development) task force’s draft law, the Bengaluru Governance Bill 2009, is still hanging fire. This Bill talks of directly electing a Mayor and electing members to ward committees. But confusion looms large over this as some city politicos are not keen on having elected members on the ward committee.

Transport Minister R Ashoka. Pic: Vaishnavi Vittal.

Amidst all the election-talk, Citizen Matters caught up with state Transport Minister R Ashoka. In this ten-minute interview, he speaks about taking on independent candidates, nominating ward committee members and his reported Mayoral-aspirations. During the interview, BBMP Commissioner Bharat Lal Meena, BJP MLA of Jayanagar and JP Nagar B N Vijaykumar and Kannada actor and BJP member Jaggesh were also present.

There is a lot of energy among resident welfare associations, citizens forums as well as urban poor workers unions to float independent candidates for the council elections. Margins last time around (2001) were very thin in many wards, and this time the wards are smaller. Many are frustrated with mainline parties. How is your party planning to fight the independent surge – especially among the well educated voters – this time?

I think independent candidates are a regular process. For any local body elections, gram panchayat, taluk panchayat, independent candidates are more than political party candidates. So I think that is not a problem. Depending upon the ward, it may increase. That will not (cause any) harm to national parties.

ABIDE reform proposes elections for ward committees. Some politicians are saying they don’t want elected people on ward committees other than the ward councillor. What is your take?

No, already, for any constituency we have MP, Lok Sabha member, and there is MLA for Vidhan Sabha, and then corporators are there for city council. So already three elected members are there. I think one more (level) is not….scientifically it is not good. And last time we have nominated some ward councilors also. That is also problematic. So I think someone further at the low-level, as an elected member, is not necessary. Nominating is better, I think.

Has this been discussed widely in your party? Is there a consensus?

Ashoka’s initial response to this question was to merely state once more that ward committee elections was not possible. On being pressed with whether his party has discussed it, Ashoka went on to state that the matter is being discussed with party members and also among the leadership.

On asking him if there is some trouble discussing the topic of ward committees, he said there is no problem and that they have almost come to a conclusion. On further questioning him about the opportunities that ward committee elections could open up to the ‘educated’ public and youth, this is what he had to say.

Normally I think in Corporation election almost all youngsters will come. So I think there is no problem.

What are your thoughts on the direct election of a mayor, but with expanded powers?

That is a good, good suggestion from the Kasturirangan report. But already (High) Court directed Government of Karnataka, to conduct immediate elections. So I think mayor-in-council will happen. You have to make a separate Act for Bangalore. In Mumbai, Delhi, West Bengal, etc., they have separate Acts for their city. We have no Act.

So this needs more time. The (High) Court already directed to do immediate elections. It’s (a new Act) is not possible now.

(The Kasturirangan Committee preceded ABIDE and originally proposed a directly elected mayor for Bengaluru. The latter made broadly similar-minded recommendations for city reforms, with many recommendations on the lines of the former.)

What kind of powers would you like the mayor to have?

Now this is not a discussing point.

Are you looking at running for the post of mayor?

No, I’m not.   ⊕

RELATED
RELATED

Related Articles

Minister Katta S Naidu challenges independents in upcoming BBMP polls
Ward reservations: 61 women, 44 BC and 15 SC
BBMP elections on 21 Feb, voting on a Sunday
Why BBMP elections are not happening

Comments:

  1. S.P.Swamynathan says:

    An addition from the Citizen side will hinder the action of MP MLA corporator
    in accumulating assets/money. As I understand to be a candidate for election they have to shel-out hefty amou8nt. This has to be recovered and + for his use. I was over hearing, while taking a stroll, some persons who have switched over to BJP has to be b(r)ought back. You can see what will happen. Jagate raho or No jagateraho

  2. Pramod Naik says:

    Thanks Ms. Vittal for your public service in exposing this half-baked Minister who’s incharge of Bangalore! I think Ashok makes strong attempts to show that he knows a few words of English, but it makes hilarious reading for us all. He’s as much a **** as all the others and he is just looking at the potential cash-flow situation for himself.

  3. Srikanth Parthasarathy says:

    Thanks for these excellent interviews. Unfortunately, all politicians are same while responding. Nothing good can be expected.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…