BBMP spent Rs 1.6 Cr for food at council meetings

BBMP councillors are paid Rs 7,500 per month. They are also paid Rs 400 per council meeting. There were 150 council meetings held in last five years.

BBMP spends an average of Rs 1.35 lakh on food and other arrangements during council meetings. Pic: Shree D N

The five-year term of BBMP council has come to an end and namma Bengaluru is gearing up for yet another election. Before you get into election mode, ever wondered how much public money has been spent on your corporators and how frequently the BBMP council meetings were held in last five years? Here is a peek into such lesser-known facts.

While council meetings are considered as an opportunity for the elected representatives to discuss serious issues concerning the public, many a times the meetings just end up serving no purpose. In the last BBMP’s term, from April 2010 to April 2015, the BBMP conducted 150 council meetings. This includes monthly council meetings, budget meetings, special meetings and mayor and standing committee election meetings. It implies on an average 30 meetings were held every year.

As the number of meetings goes up, the amount spent on providing food and water, and the conveyance paid to the councillors for attending the meetings too increases proportionately. Citizen Matters gathered data on the expenditure on account of BBMP council meetings, which revealed interesting details when analysed.

Councillor who returned the honorarium

Even as there are whispers in the BBMP corridors about a few corporators who give a miss to the meetings but promptly take sitting fee home by signing the attendance register, a corporator has done the opposite. A first time corporator, A M Hanumanthe Gowda from Herohalli ward has returned his honorarium and sitting fee to the BBMP.

Council Secretary H Chennappa said that the corporator issued a cheque of Rs 4.80 lakh to the BBMP’s Council Secretary’s office recently and it is apparently for the first time a BBMP corporator has made this gesture as far as his knowledge is concerned.

When Citizen Matters asked Hanumanthe Gowda the reason for returning the amount, he said he did not want to utilise the money at a time when BBMP was undergoing a financial crisis. “In addition, it is taxpayers’ money and I did not want to use their money for my personal benefit,” he said.

Rs 337 per person spent on food

The BBMP has spent Rs 1.60 crore to provide snacks and lunch to the corporators and officers who have attended the meetings.

According to the information Citizen Matters gathered from BBMP Council Secretary’s office, the Palike has spent on an average Rs 1.35 lakh to provide feast in every council meeting. The amount spent on providing veg meal is Rs 1.30 lakh and the expenditure incurred on the days when non-veg meal too was served is Rs 1.42 lakh.

BBMP arranges food for 400 persons in every meeting, which means on an average Rs 337 is spent on meal, tea and snacks for each person. The food expense per meeting was a little more than Rs 1 lakh in 2010 and 2011, whereas the expenditure increased in last two years.

Sitting fee and honorarium

Apart from the monthly honorarium of  Rs 7,500 given to the corporators, they were also paid conveyance allowance of Rs 1,000 every month. Sitting fee of Rs 400 was given for attending a council meeting. There is no upper limit for paying the sitting fee for council meetings. If five meetings are held in a month, they are paid Rs 2,000 as sitting fee.

In addition, the corporators were paid Rs 200 for attending standing committee meetings. However, the maximum sitting fee given for attending committee meetings is Rs 400. The Mayor was given a monthly honorarium of Rs 20,000 and Deputy Mayor was paid Rs 15,000.

BBMP’s expenditure on council meetings and corporators

Item/detail

 Amount

Snacks and meals

Rs 1.35 lakh on an average (per meeting)

Honorarium

Rs 20,000 (monthly) to Mayor

Rs 15,000 to Deputy Mayor

Rs 7,500 to corporators

Conveyance allowance

Rs 1,000 (monthly)

Sitting fee for council meeting

Rs 400 (per meeting)

Fee for committee meetings

Rs 200 (per meeting)

Related Articles

Final ward reservation list stumps most corporators
Govt will use BBMP division as an excuse to delay polls: CAF
BBMP division to be finalised by June 2015
Councillors refuse to become techsavvy; BBMP to waste 48 lakhs on hard copies
Will Kataria Committee report help govt to dissolve BBMP council?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Left off the list: How SIR is costing transgender voters their rights

Mismatched documents, hostile families, and no dedicated support leave many trans citizens at risk of being removed from electoral rolls.

For Rayyan Monkey, a transgender voter from Mumbai, the SIR does not just threaten her right to vote. It also risks her ability to travel freely and exist as a woman in the country. Raised abroad before moving to Mumbai, Rayyan was left unmapped on the voter lists because her parents did not vote in 2002. The only way for her to complete her progeny mapping is to provide either her grandfather’s Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) card or her father’s birth certificate. However, after coming out to her family, Rayyan has been estranged from her extended relatives. Her father’s documents,…

Similar Story

Karnataka Apartment Management Bill: The proposed law needs one critical correction

A flaw in the Karnataka Apartment Bill, 2026 could derail apartment governance in Bengaluru and beyond. Why the 50% allotment rule must be amended.

The proposed Karnataka Apartment Management Bill, 2026 is an important step towards simplifying apartment governance in the state. By replacing the overlapping provisions of the Karnataka Ownership Flats Act (KOFA) and the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act (KAOA) with a single legislation, the government has an opportunity to create a more transparent and efficient legal framework for apartment communities. Many of the proposed provisions are likely to benefit homebuyers, apartment associations and developers alike, by reducing legal ambiguity and providing a common framework for the management of residential communities. However, one provision deserves urgent reconsideration before the Bill becomes law. Formation…