Say no to firecrackers

Let's think a little before going out to buy those firecrackers not only with regard to child labour, but of safety, pollution, and disturbance, too.

I’ve been reading queries on various mailing lists I belong to, about joint expeditions to Hosur to buy fireworks for the approaching festival of Deepavali. Some of the members ask, since the tax differential is large enough to make a difference, why not share a car and go to buy fireworks?

Indeed, there will be a price difference between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka (Hosur and Bangalore) for fireworks, as for many other things.

However, I  remember that one year everyone was up in arms about  child labour being utilised in making fireworks and we all boycotted fireworks. Have things changed at all, since then, at Sivakasi? I continue to boycott personal  fireworks for safety reasons, too and only go to see anything set off by KGA, Bangalore Club, etc. Once, we used to have community fireworks in Kanteerava Stadium, I wonder what happened to them. They were safe, and it was fun to go together to watch.

And if we have to buy fireworks, could we just stick to the light-effects ones and not buy noisy ones, and be considerate of babies, elders, sick people, and pets/animals? One of our friends, I am not joking, was killed by a stray firework that went into his ear one Deepavali.

Of course, this is up to each person; it’s only a suggestion.But I can’t help feeling that if all of us acted in unison, it would be a less noisy, disturbing, and more safe Deepavali for all of us.

A documentary on Sivakasi’s child labourers can be seen here.

Let’s think a little before going out to buy those firecrackers not only with regard to child labour, but of safety, pollution,  and disturbance, too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Open letter to Chief Justice of India: Withdraw unjust remarks made against environmental groups

In the letter, conservationists, lawyers and civil society groups highlighted the constitutional right of citizens to demand the enforcement of environmental laws.

A collective of citizens, environmentalists, legal experts and civil society organisations from across India has demanded that the Supreme Court withdraw oral remarks made by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) during the Pipavav Port hearing on May 11, 2026. The group aims to ensure these comments are not misinterpreted as questioning the legitimacy of genuine environmental public-interest litigation, or the constitutional right of citizens and affected communities to demand the enforcement of environmental laws. In an open letter to the CJI, the coalition outlined urgent environmental concerns and the right of citizens to question irregularities in projects negatively impacting…

Similar Story

The trees we forget: What a city loses when the canopy disappears

Bengaluru's trees are more than shade; they are memory, identity, and resistance. Their loss leaves the city harsher and emptier.

Summer in India has been merciless this year, with many states recording temperatures above 42 degrees Celsius and rising reports of fatalities. Despite these harsh conditions, urban support continues for development projects that clear trees, wetlands, mangroves, and forests near cities. A recent Article 14 report provides data on thousands of trees that will soon be sacrificed nationally for infrastructure projects. Those opposing such unscientific large-scale tree felling are often labelled 'tree-huggers', 'anti-development' and 'anti-nationals'. While capitalism accelerates environmental degradation and the world faces a growing climate crisis, societal divisions deepen.  Yet, we give trees too little credit: Beings necessary…