Who is accountable for lake pollution in Bengaluru?

Most lakes in Bengaluru are polluted. Why? Who all failed in their duties? Here are some answers.

Why are lakes in Bengaluru polluted? Who is accountable? Karnataka government has recently constituted Karnataka Lake Conservation and Development Authority (KLCDA) to oversee the lake conservation. But there are many agencies in the city that are supposed to handle specific issues related to pollution. 

But there is a problem. With multiple bodies looking after different systems, there is no accountability for any of them. When the crisis hits, they blame each other and get away, while the lakes emit fire and froth. Here is an explanation of which agency is responsible for what problem, as far as a lake is considered.

Raw sewage from houses: Bengaluru Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) is the reason for the domestic sewage in Bengaluru’s lakes. Bengaluru is not fully covered with a sewerage network and sewage treatment facilities. A lot of apartments and layouts especially on the outskirts of the city are left with no option but to leave their sewage to stormwater drains or the lakes. In some areas, old underground sewerage networks have collapsed and connectivity has been lost. Restoration work is slow. The result: Raw sewage enters lakes and pollutes them.

Partly treated sewage from BWSSB STPS: BWSSB has many Sewage Treatment Plants in the city, but they are not operated in the right manner, and the treated sewage does not meet the required parameters. These STPs don’t have power back-up, poorly maintained and are shut down during power cut.

Poorly treated sewage from the STPs of large apartments: Many apartments have under-designed STPs. There is no foolproof Consent for Establishment and Operations (CFE-CFO) process in place. Some apartments operate STPs that use unproven technology, which don’t work reliably/ consistently. Poor operation of apartment STPs due to lack of trained operators, poor maintenance by untrained vendors, ageing defects being not detected because of lack of process for annual CFO are the other problems.

Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) needs to take care of these situations, by means of proper approval processes and timely inspection.

Raw sewage gets diluted by treated sewage: Treated sewage from apartment STPs needs only tertiary treatment (to remove nitrates and phosphates. But raw sewage needs primary and secondary treatment first, and then tertiary treatment. But there is no separate logistical arrangement for both types of sewage. Both are dumped into rainwater drains, which reaches the lakes directly. The diluted sewage is not easy to treat. BWSSB, KSPCB, BBMP and BDA facilitate this wrongdoing, by providing infrastructure, letting the violations happen and not penalising the violators.

NP content in domestic sewage of all types (raw sewage, partially treated sewage and fully treated sewage):

No STP belonging to either BWSSB or large apartments has the capacity to treat Nitrates and Phosphates. KSPCB is not fining these apartments for not treating the sewage in right way.

Wetlands are not functional: Wetlands are developed into layouts and buildings or are not preserved and become dry. Drains feeding wetlands are encroached. This situation stops the lake from getting rainwater. All lakes do not have an upstream wetland. BDA, BBMP, KSPCB and LDA who can take action on this situation are responsible for the problems arising out of this situation.

Industrial effluents: Authorities allow unauthorised industries to operate within residential and commercial zones. There is no policy to account for total pollution load, and this leads to indiscriminate approvals for all kinds of industries. Industries allowed to operate without suitable Effluent Treatment Plants (ETP). As a result, industrial pollutants reach the lakes without any hurdle. KSPCB and BBMP are responsible for taking action on this situation.

Drains clogged with garbage create a huge amount of leachate: BBMP does not have logistics to handle all types of waste. People are forced to dump solid waste in drains. Hawkers and BBMP staff sometimes dump garbage, paper cups, coconut shells and vegetable waste into drains. BBMP can control this situation if there is willpower to do so.

Pollution potential is not assessed in the right manner, for the entire lifecycle of the business for any type of waste produced. No business is forced to declare its logistics channels for handling its pollution of all types. KSPCB and BBMP are the agencies that can put processes in place, control this and penalise the guilty.

Thus, all the power to control pollution in lakes lies with the agencies that operate in Bengaluru. The failure of these agencies has resulted in the present situation where lakes catch fire and are dumped with garbage.

Note: Facts from a table on accountability for lakes, shared by Nagesh Aras, a citizen living near Bellandur, have been used in this story.

Related Articles

One authority for Bangalore lakes becomes active, looks for lake wardens
High Court rules to stop destruction of Bangalore lakes
How to revive your neighbourhood lake

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Jakkur lake: The story of an urban ecosystem

Jala Poshan, a community-led trust, collaborates with citizens and government agencies to ensure the upkeep of Jakkur Lake.

Jakkur Lake is on the outskirts of Bengaluru, north of the bustle of the city centre. There is a strong breeze in the morning, but the lake lies calm. Cormorants stretch out their wings to dry. Runners stretch their legs before jogging the 5 kilometre path around the lake.  Just as the lake serves the surrounding community, the community serves the lake. Jala Poshan, or “Nurturing Water” in Hindi, is a community-led trust that works to create a healthy community space around Jakkur Lake. The creation of the trust was initially facilitated by Satya Foundation, which provided funding and fostered…

Similar Story

What would it take to make eco-friendly packaging pocket-friendly too?

Those who opt for eco-friendly alternatives face many challenges, such as high cost, availability of raw materials, and short shelf life.

As dawn breaks, there is a steady stream of customers at Muhammed's tea shop in Chennai. As they arrive, he serves them tea in glass tumblers. However, one customer insists on a paper cup for hygiene reasons, despite Muhammed explaining that the glass tumblers are washed and sterilised with hot water. Glass tumblers cost around Rs 20 each and can be reused hundreds of times until they break. In contrast, paper cups cost Rs 100 for 50 cups (Rs 2 per cup) and are neither reusable nor environment-friendly. “Though plastic-coated paper cups are banned, we can’t avoid using them when…