2010: The year that was not

Some important events never happened in 2010, that should have.

As we go into Citizen Matters’ special list of developments for the year that was for Bengaluru, how about the year that was not?

But before that, some context: Bengaluru is touted as global powerhouse in the West for its IT-prowess! US President Obama often raises the spectre of Bangaloreans stealing American jobs. A top American columnist even warned US children to pay attention to their studies or else Bangalore’s students would take their jobs of the future. Such is the fear Bangalore evokes in the West.

Still, look at the inside picture. Some important events never happened in 2010, that should have.

* Bengaluru did not get a mayor with expanded executive powers. Our worshipful mayor remains a mere convenor of the council. He cannot really do much else for the city.

* Bengaluru did not get a mayor with a 5-year term. The mayor has a one-year term, when underpasses themselves take 1 1/2 to two years! Our mayor cannot even oversee the finishing of a road project before he is gone.

* All planning power for the Bangalore region did not move into into a Metropolitan Committee (as mandated by the Consitution) consisting of elected representatives from the city and urban area panchayats, instead of BDA. The committee itself has not been formed!

* Citizens have not been elected or nominated into ward committees, even though city elections happened in March 2010.

To bring these measures into force, a reform legislation has been lying at the state cabinet for over a year. Instead, what we got was this: cabinet ministers are deciding whether an underground parking lot should be built in a city park instead, with the elected city council not being anywhere in the picture. The mayor is silent.
So there you have it. Top, feared, city around the world, and a ‘chicken’ of a city government back home. ⊕

⊕

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…