2010: The year that was not

Some important events never happened in 2010, that should have.

As we go into Citizen Matters’ special list of developments for the year that was for Bengaluru, how about the year that was not?

But before that, some context: Bengaluru is touted as global powerhouse in the West for its IT-prowess! US President Obama often raises the spectre of Bangaloreans stealing American jobs. A top American columnist even warned US children to pay attention to their studies or else Bangalore’s students would take their jobs of the future. Such is the fear Bangalore evokes in the West.

Still, look at the inside picture. Some important events never happened in 2010, that should have.

* Bengaluru did not get a mayor with expanded executive powers. Our worshipful mayor remains a mere convenor of the council. He cannot really do much else for the city.

* Bengaluru did not get a mayor with a 5-year term. The mayor has a one-year term, when underpasses themselves take 1 1/2 to two years! Our mayor cannot even oversee the finishing of a road project before he is gone.

* All planning power for the Bangalore region did not move into into a Metropolitan Committee (as mandated by the Consitution) consisting of elected representatives from the city and urban area panchayats, instead of BDA. The committee itself has not been formed!

* Citizens have not been elected or nominated into ward committees, even though city elections happened in March 2010.

To bring these measures into force, a reform legislation has been lying at the state cabinet for over a year. Instead, what we got was this: cabinet ministers are deciding whether an underground parking lot should be built in a city park instead, with the elected city council not being anywhere in the picture. The mayor is silent.
So there you have it. Top, feared, city around the world, and a ‘chicken’ of a city government back home. ⊕

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…