Now, state govt nod needed for local elections!

In a democracy, the minimum that we should be able to expect is HOLDING ELECTIONS ON TIME. But it seems now that even this basic threshold is not guaranteed in Karnataka. Yesterday, the legislature passed a law – with all parties agreeing – that the State Election Commission cannot schedule elections to local bodies (like BBMP and other city governments) without its ‘consent’. I.e. if the state government feels the time is not right for holding elections, that’s the way it will be.

The Election Commission of India controls only Parliament and Assembly elections, and those are constitutionally anchored. Elections to local bodies is controlled by State Election Commission, which are not as independent, constitutionally.

We all know what happened when they refused to hold BBMP elections for almost 4 years. MLAs like it when there are no local bodies, because in the absence of corporators they get to rule over the constituency without competition. But this is plainly undemocratic, and unconstitutional, possibly.

I am sure we are heading for a situation where, when BBMP council term ends in two years, the State government will say that (a) delimitation of wards for the next election is not complete; (b) we are considering splitting up BBMP into smaller municipalities, and (c) we dont think SEC should hold elections until these two issues are sorted out.

The problem for voters is that THERE IS NO ONE IN THE ASSEMBLY TO CHALLENGE ANY OF THIS, even though it is clearly going to dilute voter participation in governance. That’s why we need to contest elections and win some of these spots, so that the casual dilution of democracy does not happen.

I think we should also explore in court whether such delays in holding elections are constitutional. In my view, elections should be held on the same date each year, for all levels of government which are due for a change of government. Considering the tendency of our governments to not last full term we can perhaps have two dates, one in May and another in November, and schedule all elections on these.

Under no circumstances should ANYONE in the country have the right to say that elections are not needed on time. If we’re going to build a future based on such thinking, we may as well stop calling ourselves a democracy.

I hope the Governor will not sign this bad law into enactment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…

Similar Story

Bidadi GBIT project: Land acquisition process and compensation raises critical questions

As the goverment focuses on land acquisition for the 7,481-acre project, are farmers' rights and crucial social impact checks being compromised?

The Greater Bengaluru Integrated Township (GBIT) in Bidadi, first notified in March 2025, received its final notification in June 2026 under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act (KUDA Act), 1987. The project is branded as India's first and largest AI City, featuring an AI-integrated township. The project will be implemented by the Greater Bengaluru Development Authority (GBDA) under the same act. Three villages, Kempainapalya, Vaderahalli, and Mandalahalli are notified in the Gazette under Section 19(1) of the KUDA Act for the implementation of a development scheme, deemed as public purpose. The development scheme is spread over a total of 7,481…