63% of private security firms in Karnataka unlicensed

A huge number of private security services are said to be functioning without a license, swamping the market.

The Private Security Agencies Regulation (PSAR) Act, implemented in 2005, does not seem to be fulfilling its purpose.

Security guards from a private security firm. Pic: Author

According to the Internal Security Division, the licensing authority of the Karnataka government, 1,506 PSAs are functioning in the state. But only 548, or 36 percent, work with a valid license.

Applications by 258 security agencies for licenses are being processed, and around 25 applications had been rejected in the six months to Oct. 31.

During a one-day conclave organized by the Karnataka Security Services Association (KSSA) on Nov. 24, Bhaskar Rao, he inspector general of police and controller authority, said operators of companies working without a license face imprisonment or a hefty penalty.

When asked about the possible reasons for these private security agencies functioning without license, Additional Director General of Police Bipin Gopal Krishna said, "One of the reasons for these agencies running without license could be a lack of knowledge about the rules and regulations."

However, Bipin added that almost all the agencies were informed that the deadline for acquiring license to run a private security agency in the state is Oct. 31.

"Though sufficient publicity was made previously about the provisions in the PSAR Act, few positive responses have been reported," he said.

A vehicle from ISS SDB security service private limited. Pic: Author

According to the law, all agencies were required to obtain a license within one year of its implementation. If any agency provides security services without the license, then Section 20 of the act makes the person who runs the agency liable for imprisonment up to one year.

An official from Excellent Security Services, a private security firm in Bangalore said a huge number of private security services are working without a license, swamping the market.

"The implementation of such acts will surely help in reducing the number of security firms working illegally," he said.

Shankar Rama, a security guard who formerly worked in a private security firm said: "I was one of the many people who went back to their cities during the mass exodus of northeastern people from Bangalore because of the fear [they would become victims of ethnic violence]. But later, when the situation came under control, I came back but found that the firm was no longer functioning because the firm’s application to obtain license got rejected."

Rama said he was unaware that security firms must be licensed.

The amendment of the PSAR Act to stiffen punishments for violators was formally announced in Bangalore on November 25th, on the occasion of Security Day, by the state government and the KSSA.⊕

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…