No subsidy for Bengaluru’s weavers

Nearly 10 thousand weavers in urban Bangalore are denied of subsidies because the funds have been diverted to ‘more needy’ areas.

Chikkanna, aged 40, a traditional handloom weaver from Chowdeshwari Nagar, Kanakapura road has decided to quit weaving after things turned worse due to debt and poverty.

Three years ago when profits from his handloom died down, he took a loan to purchase a powerloom. The loan came at 12 percent interest. But he failed to repay the loan due to high interest, increasing power costs and day to day expenses.

A Handloom weaver from Sarakki. Pic: Sankar C G

Using a powerloom, one can make one or two saree per day. But the cost of one power loom is one lakh rupees, making it unaffordable for most weavers. “We get only Rs 350 per saree and it takes three days to make one saree in Handloom. How can we live with this money?” asks L Gaviranga, a weaver and a local loom association member.

Had he got the subsidy from the state government scheme, there would have been some hope for him. But Bangalore’s weavers are not eligible for subsidy.

In June 2011, the Office of Commissioner of textile development and Director of Handloom and Textile decided to provide one lakh rupees subsidy to the traditional handloom workers in Karnataka to buy powerlooms. The policy was really meant to resurrect the down turning Handloom sector. The policy enabled the weaver to buy two powerlooms. One was subsidised or in this case, free and the other could be bought on loan provided through a bank.

It was a great relief to ten thousand handloom weavers across Bangalore and majority of them applied for subsidy. All they needed to get the subsidy is to prove they have a five years of experience in the field and own a house that has access to power connection but should not possess a power loom.

However even after a year, not one of the Bangalore’s weavers have been able to avail the subsidy. In the meantime handloom weavers from Kolar, Chitradurga, Davangere, Mandya, Mangalore etc have received subsidy for the purchase of powerlooms.

When Citizen Matters spoke to Panner Selvam, Deputy Director of Handloom and textile department Bangalore, he said Bangalore weavers don’t need subsidy. “Bangalore will develop automatically. There is no need for subsidy in Bangalore. This is the order that I have received from higher office (Loom Commissioner), “ he says. Selvam adds that due to budget constraints urban Bangalore weavers are left out of the subsidy plan.

Ten crore rupees had been allocated for Karnataka in 2011 and 2012 for providing subsidy in power loom, of which thirty lakhs was allocated for urban Bangalore. But Bangalore weavers have not received any subsidy so far. When Citizen Matters contacted C Ravikumar, the Deputy Director of Handloom, he said they have diverted the money to Anekal taluk on the grounds of demand.

“The living standard of weavers at Anekal taluk is poor when compared to Bangalore. So we have taken a decision to divert it. But we will consider Urban Bangalore for providing subsidy in powerloom,” said Ravi.

Meanwhile Handloom weavers in Bangalore are leaving for some other unskilled professions. However some of them like Gaviranga hope they don’t have to do this. But cautiously says, “If the current scenario doesn’t change soon, we too might be forced to shift to some other professions.”⊕

Comments:

  1. Vinay Sreenivasa says:

    useful article! thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…