Children spoke out; but did anyone listen?

Children articulated major concerns in Bengaluru's first ever Children's Ward Sabha. But local politicians seemed to be pushing their own agenda.

I had the opportunity to attend a Children’s Ward Sabha in Vijnana Nagar on February 23rd. It was organised by CWC (The Concerned for Working Children), an NGO for child rights.

A Ward Sabha in urban areas is similar to a Gram Sabha in rural areas, wherein citizens of a village come together to voice their demands from elected representatives; these demands are supposed to be incorporated in the development package for that area.

In 2006, based on the experience of other countries which have such children’s sabhas, the Karnataka government took the initiative of making children’s gram sabhas mandatory in the state. The Children’s Ward Sabha organised in a school in Vijnana Nagar ward was the first of its kind in the city.

Children and elected representatives at the ward sabha. Pic: BBMP

Children from over 12 schools participated in the function which was also attended by local MLA Nandish Reddy N S, Vijnana Nagar Corporator Geetha Vivekanad, the Deputy Mayor S Harish, and other officials. The format of the discussion was that a few of the children would voice their problems, after which the officials would respond. A few students chosen from some schools were given the opportunity to voice problems which they had encountered.

Students took this opportunity to voice their own problems, neighbourhood issues and other general concerns. Some children talked about the lack of drainages, non-existent/leaky/smelly toilets, lack of access to schools and lack of tables at their schools. One student talked about the need to reclaim a lake which had been ‘encroached’.

Interestingly, while replying to some questions, MLA Nandish Reddy specifically addressed the lake encroachment issue and told children that the lake could be restored to its original area, but that settlements along the ‘encroached’ areas will have to be removed for this; they (children) should support it wholeheartedly and not complain if someone they knew was going be affected. Innocently, the children shouted in agreement with the MLA.

Sometime later, one of the organisers spoke to the audience and seemed to suggest that an opinion voiced by students about restoring ecology should not become a vehicle for evicting people from their settlements.

Another student seemed to suggest that widening a road in his area would bring an end to traffic problems there; seated next to this student was Deputy Mayor Harish who was seen as the ‘champion’ of Sankey Tank road widening. Most students were articulate and confident about the subjects they talked about, and it was good to see officials from different strata (corporators, MLA) share the stage – although the MLA did leave after making his speech.

While I could not stay for the entire programme, the general sense was that the initiative was much welcome. Children’s Sabhas have been recognised as spaces which nurture and deepen democracy and citizenship. It not only gives children an opportunity to voice their own concerns, but also that of their families and neighbourhood, for which other spaces might not exist. A continued engagement with citizens right from a young age prepares them to ask questions, and makes government officials more responsive.

I am sure that a question on many people’s minds was when BBMP will have Nagar Sabhas for the general public. That question remains unanswered. Also, as the question on lakes and the subsequent statement by the MLA showed, a simple problematic statement by students can be used by certain elements to further their own agenda.

Of course, such issues might occur not only in a children’s Sabha; it happens at other interactions as well, where a certain logical demand can result in convoluted actions by certain individuals. That is something citizens should be aware of while stating their demands.

⊕

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…