3 Wishes for 2012, Bengaluru

The great cities in the world are remembering that ‘citizenship’ is at the heart of their plans for the future.

THROUGHOUT the year it seems that the citizens and the city were at war with each other. You only had to think of a project proposed by a city agency, and instantly you could recollect how citizens fought against the project. Equally, whenever citizens mooted something the the city should take up – bike lanes, bus priority, better footpaths – it seemed like the entire establishment was pitted against them.

 

To me, this is the greatest warning before us. All over the world the evidence is now compelling, that cities that actively involve their citizens in decisions are doing much better than cities where the administration or the political leadership insists on its usual top-down way of doing things. Cities are also realising the the usual departmental silos in which they work are useless. Problems need to be solved, and often that requires many departments working together, and also with those who are not in government themselves.

ithout these steps, all the rest will be fruitless. The great cities in the world are remembering that ‘citizenship’ is at the heart of their plans for the future. But in Bangalore, as elsewhere in India, this realisation is yet to dawn.

Partly, this is because of the political economy, which would be disrupted hugely if the city were made more accountable to citizens. There is a lot of money to be made on kickbacks and under-performance of contracts, and watchful citizens would q uickly dent that.

But partly it is also because we do not have systems of learning that help us constantly improve the way we imagine and manage the city.

So, here is my wish list for the coming year, in the hope that it can be very different from the one just now ending.

1 Ward Committees

I would like to see the city constitute the ward committees that were promised in January 2010.

Ward committees allow citizens have a say on neighbourhood matters. These committees are still not constituted.

2 Local Budget

I would like to see at least 1/5th of the budget of BBMP be decided by the wards themselves.

Citizen in their wards must be able to have a say over plans and expenditure for their neighbourhoods. This will also ensure greater local participation. 

3 Coordinated Problem Solving

I would like to see at least one city problem tackled by departments coming together to achieve an outcome.

For example, well designed bus stops along all the Big10 roads will go a long away in speeding transit along the arterial roads of the city like Hosur Road, Bellary Road, Old Madras Road, Bannerghatta Road, Sarjapur Road etc . Too often, such problems are left unsolved by BBMP, BMTC, BESCOM, etc. because each organisation blames the other.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…