PPP and incapacity in government

Last week, IIM held a conference on the twin themes of Urban Government and Public Private Partnerships. A lot of different papers from around the world were submitted, and many speakers provided insights on how other countries are trying to innovate in these areas. I’ll put up a link to the the presentations once they’re all compiled, but in the meanwhile I want to draw attention to something that’s been bothering me for a while.

PPPs have typically been taken up to overcome shortages of capacities and funds in government. That is, we begin by saying that something good must be done, and the government has neither the money nor the ability to do this. So we must look for parterns in the private sector to do this. The second thing that is universal about PPPs is the money bit. It is assumed that no one will do these good things except for money, and so we must come up with a model that makes it ‘viable’ for the private sector to be motivated to do them.

There’s nothing wrong with any of this, in principle. But here’s a question worth thinking about – if incapacity in government is the problem, why doesn’t anyone take up a PPP with the objective of building this capacity? Why are we instead conceding so quickly that the government will never be capable of doing the things it cannot do today?

There are four reasons, that I can think of, why we should build capacity within government, and make this a core objective of all PPPs. One, we should eliminate the problem – build capacity within government, so that we are not forced to do things because we lack it. Second, in some cases, transfering government functions to the private sector changes the citizens-expecting-governance relationship into a consumers-getting-service-for-a-price relationship, and I don’t think we’ve fully understood the implications of this.

Third, since both the private and public sectors need each other for overall economic growth, we should not really be allowing capacities in government to diminish endlessly. And fourth, I think that if the government itself took up some of the projects that are now being carried out under PPPs, there would be fewer contentious issues.

One more thing. Profit is important, but I think it’s overblown in some of our conversations. In any society, there is always at least a small group of people who don’t mind putting a lower price on their time and efforts than the market allows, in order to pursue public good objectives. Around the world, scholars in universities and research labs do this all the time. And we can too.

I think it could be quite exciting to put together a research lab to work on solutions to a wide range of social and economic problems. I’d be excited to work at a place like that for a long time, and I have a suspicion many others would too.

Comments:

  1. Divya Harave says:

    Great post.Especially the part about enabling the governments.

  2. Sudhira says:

    I totally agree to your argument. The challenge remains.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Children in North Chennai keep local democracy alive through Bala Sabhas

Child councillors push for change in Chennai by bringing attention to crucial issues like drug addiction.

“A democracy masterclass is brewing in North Chennai, where children are showing the way for the 200 ward councillors of the Greater Chennai Corporation,” says Charu Govindan, Founder and Convener at Voice of People. For around six years, her collective has advocated for Area Sabhas, which many councillors conveniently skip to avoid meeting the residents.  But Bala Sabhas, led by child councillors in North Chennai for over a year, are pushing for real change. They have prompted the installation of new street lights and barbed wire fencing at a local GCC school in Tondiarpet, for example.  What is a Bala…

Similar Story

Comprehensive plan in place to minimise environmental impact of Namma Metro construction: BMRCL

Following Citizen Matters' article on Namma Metro construction and its effects on air quality, BMRCL responds.

At Citizen Matters, we recently published an article by our reporter Gangadharan B, addressing the increased dust pollution caused by Namma Metro construction in Bengaluru. The report explored how certain mitigation measures are not being followed at Namma Metro construction sites, affecting air quality and taking a toll on public health. The report also raised questions on whether the air quality in the construction sites is monitored regularly as per the suggestions of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) report. While multiple attempts were made to reach out to Bengaluru Metro Rail Construction Limited (BMRCL) before publishing the article, we did…