Why no objections to BESCOM’s proposed rate hike?

Only three people objected to BESCOM’s proposal for a price hike. Why is it that people put up with the arbitrary ways of BESCOM and not question it?

So BESCOM wants us to pay 75 paise extra per unit of electricity consumed, as per its proposal. Some citizens are opposing this and registering their dissatisfaction, but the  majority of us apparently  can’t be bothered or don’t care, or  are not even aware of the proposal – the last, however, is no excuse because  the proposed hike has been in the news and the BESCOM authorities have also issued notices inviting reactions (and objections if any) from citizens.

Three months ago, the Consumer Care Society of Banashankari bemoaned the fact that the initial announcement inviting citizens’ comments, brought in exactly three objections. Three, out of around 60 lakh residents of the city?

I am asking myself – is it because namma ooru is prospering by leaps and bounds, and so most of us think we don’t have to worry about a piddling 75 paise hike?  Bengaluru now boasts the second largest number of millionaires in the country (13,130, almost a fifth of the country’s total number of lakhpatis) so perhaps one should write off those 13,000-odd Bangaloreans from the list of those who would be expected to be agitated over a hike in electricity charges.

Then take away the 570 slums that account for a population of 36.31 lakhs (up from 29 lakhs at the last Census) and the numbers remaining still come to over 33 lakhs. And out of those 33 lakhs, 3 people send objections as concerned citizens. Even allowing for a few more objections sent in during the last few weeks, what percentage do we have, in terms of participatory involvement on our part?

Assuming that the average middle class urban household of four family members consumes between 70 and 100 units of electricity per month, that works out to a hike of Rs 50-75. Not a huge amount in these inflationary times, one must concede, but it is not the quantum of increase but the ramifications and spectrum of issues underlying it.

For at least a decade now, public utility undertakings have had court judgments decreeing that providers of essential services (water, electricity, telephones) have to first prove that there is no scope for increasing efficiency of operations before they can seek a hike in user fees. If there are transmission losses or theft from power lines, the undertaking has to address this before it asks legitimate users to shell out more. None of us has even raised this question to ask whether there are leaks that need to be plugged first.

Then there is the vexing reality of power cuts. And I don’t mean just the shutdowns necessitated by demand exceeding supply. We have had load shedding during scheduled timings, to cope with shortages, which – whatever the political or vested interest reasons – is acceptable and accepted. But what about the kind of shabbiness that I referred to in an earlier column that of electricity going off for a few minutes, without warning and then coming back?

I have monitored such breaks, and find that they range from 90 seconds to five minutes or just a little over. That clearly is not a part of "load shedding", whether scheduled or unscheduled. It just doesn’t make sense to have shut downs for a couple of minutes. If it was a breakdown, it ought to take more than a minute to restore the trip, and if it was a breakdown that occurs daily, without fail, three or four times (as it now does) we as users have a right to ask why breakdowns occur so frequently, and what BESCOM is doing about it.

The statutory truth is that we as consumers have a contractual deal – you lay the cables and provide the meters, and supply power at such-and-such rate, and we pay as per your deadlines or shell out penalties in the form of interest or disconnection. That contractual agreement gets tossed by the wayside if we have to keep paying (and agree to periodic hikes in addition) whether the supply is reasonably reliable or not.

The photocopying shop across the road loses business if the power supply is off. Cash registers at shops cannot be used if the power is off, and at places like Janata Bazaar the staff struggle to make out bills by hand because the machines don’t work. Household work gets stalled – a variety of chores, ranging from ironing the children’s school uniforms for the next day, to using the kitchen mixer to running the washing machine (not to mention using a bread maker – with rising incomes, a variety of fancy gadgets are coming into use in the city) get interrupted.

Children doing their homework or preparing for exams suffer. And not everyone can afford – or has – a UPS. So the rich manage without suffering inconvenience while the rest swallow their annoyance, curse, or put up with powerlessness with philosophical resignation.

I am using the word powerlessness with deliberate intent – it is not just having one’s electricity supply cut off at random, it is being at the mercy of a service provider that draws up arbitrary rules, changes them at will, and recognises in return no obligations. The meter charges remain constant, whether the power supply is reasonable or erratic. The authorities fix the unit charges without ensuring that leaks are plugged, and illegal connections and tapping penalised. With the result that the law-abiding citizen ends up having to pay increased rates while the culprits (whether it is inefficient employees or users drawing illegal power) go scot-free.

Are the majority of us agreeable to this?


  1. Divya Harave says:

    Hi Sakuntala

    Can you please point me to a newspaper online where BESCOM has given such a notice? I would also like to contribute by raising an objection. (I confess I rarely read the newspaper). If BESCOM has this on their website, then it will be great if you can point me to the link, I looked there but couldn’t find anything.

  2. Yazarbaby says:

    completely approve the hike. State govt. heavily subsidizes the electricity from tax revenue which is just not right. Even ignorint “transmission loss” aka theft we don’t pay on cost+ basis for what we use. If they charge more hopefully they’ll use better equipment and more monitoring and improve the reliability. If we don’t pay on cost+ basis we will all continue to pay thousands of rupees for inverters, UPS’s and DG set or learn to live with erratic power suply.

  3. Scarlet Pimpernel says:

    If BESCOM provided a webpage where objections could be received similar to online complaints feedback, the number would have been more. It is not clear what happens after objections are raised, will BESCOM take action such that consumers who objected lose their power connection ? See fear is the key.

  4. Editors says:

    Note from author:
    The notification was in the papers about 2 week ago (and earlier too, perhaps) there was also a prominent news report a week ago. Not sure if it is on their website. (You don’t read the newspapers? That’s what I mean — by law, the announcement inviting objections if any, has to appear in newspapers, I think the law has not been updated to mandate announcements on websites (I could be mistaken…) so the onus is on the public….
    – Sakuntala

  5. Editors says:

    Report in DH, Oct 29: “Various civic groups like Consumer Care Society said the proposed hike will badly hit the consumers. The group says that industries who consume more power would be paying 22 per cent more. This would also mean that those who consume less might have to pay 33 per cent more tariff.”

    CIVIC has a objection letter here: http://civic-bangalore.blogspot.com/2010/10/objections-to-bescoms-proposed-tariff.html

  6. S Srinivasan says:

    When this elected Govt and BBMP are out to squeeze the last paisa from the Citizens, where and to whom we should go with a complaint? Are there any effective ways to stop these looters of the State ? Please see the fate of our highly respected Shri Hegde. How can anybody stop corruption when the whole Govt and BBMP is corrupt and rotten from top to bottom ? Somebody had said that when rape is inevitable , relax and enjoy. Sorry to use these words but Citizens’ status in this State /Country is like that. Whether it is road widening or tariff Increase or Denotification of lands…the Govt and its agencies are bent upon swallowing the funds for their personal and party benefits. The Citizens are there between Devil and the Deep Sea to satisfy their money hunger.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Lok Sabha elections 2024: North East Delhi — Know your constituency and candidates

In the high profile contest for North East Delhi, BJP's star MP Manoj Tiwari takes on the firebrand Kanhaiya Kumar (INC). Who are the others?

Table of contentsAbout the constituencyAt a glanceMap of the constituencyFind your polling boothPast election resultsIncumbent MP : Manoj Kumar TiwariOnline presenceCriminal casesPositions heldAssets and LiabilitiesPerformance in ParliamentMPLAD funds utilisationCandidates contesting in 2024Key candidates in the newsIssues of the constituencyAlso read About the constituency Well known for its high migrant labour population from the states of Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, North East Delhi constituency comprises the following areas: Burari, Timarpur, Karawal Nagar, Ghonda, Babarpur, Gokalpur (SC), Seemapuri (SC), Seelampur, Rohtas Nagar and Mustafabad. This constituency has the highest average population density of 36,155 persons per square km — the highest…

Similar Story

Lok Sabha elections 2024: Chandni Chowk — Know your constituency and candidates

Delhi-based businessman, Praveen Khandelwal of the BJP takes on Congress' Jai Prakash Agarwal. Know more about them and other contenders.

Table of contentsAbout the constituencyMap of the Constituency Find your polling boothIncumbent MP: Harsh Vardhan, BJPOnline PresenceCriminal CasesPositions HeldPerformance in ParliamentMPLAD fundsCandidates contesting in 2024Key Candidates in the newsIssues of the constituencyAlso read About the constituency  Chandni Chowk Lok Sabha constituency is one of the seven Lok Sabha constituencies in the Indian National Capital Territory of Delhi. This constituency came into existence in 1956. It is the smallest constituency of Lok Sabha in terms of area. Since the delimitation of parliamentary constituencies in 2008, it is made up of ten assembly constituencies, which are Adarsh Nagar, Shalimar Bagh, Shakur Basti, Tri…