How the Sarkar helps its class with BDA sites

Between 2007 and 2009, the state government has allotted more than 350 sites to 'eminent' citizens across the state under G-category. A majority are for politicians, government officials and staff.

In response to an RTI application filed by Citizen Matters, the BDA has listed out the 364 allottees who were given BDA sites under G-category during 2007-08 and 2008-09. Karnataka law allows BDA plot allocations on the fast track (no need to wait in a queue) to ‘eminent’ individuals under a rule called G-category.

Incidentally, in the RTI application, Citizen Matters had specifically asked ‘for particulars for eminence’ for all people who were allocated these sites. In the BDA’s reply, the entire question of what was ’eminent’ about the allottees was ducked. Instead the BDA sent a list of 364 allottees. The list was a re-statement of a part of BDA’s own annual report. Here’s a summary.

Of the 364 plots, 200 were given to government-related allottees – politicians, officials and their staff – given by the government itself!

MLAs, ex-MLAs, ministers, MPs and ex-MPS were given 146 plots (typically 50x80s). Fifty-five plots were given to people in (or retired from) government service (typically 40×60 and 40x30s) – from drivers of ministers and typists to officials such as a Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) member.

And a whopping 89 allottees were listed with ‘no documents on file’ or their details were left blank. The BDA does not know who they are.

Allottees Number of sites
Members of Parliament (MP) and ex-MPs 11
MLAs and ex-MLAs 106
MLCs 17
Ministers and ex-ministers 12
Documents not filed  89
Government servants (includes state and central government officials retired officers) 27
Government servants (staff including drivers, typists, computer programmers and so on) 28
House wives 16
Agriculturists 8
Social workers
5
Others (like cine artists, doctors, army officers and so on) 4

Most of the layouts where these sites were handed out included areas like BTM IV stage, HSR layout, HRBR layout and OMBR layout.

Also to be noted is the plot size given to each type of allottee. While a majority of the MLAs, MPs and ministers were given either 40×60 sites or 50x80s, the other government servants like drivers, typists and so on were given 30×40 sites.

There seems to be a pattern even in the areas where allotments have been made. While the politicians have received sites in areas like HRBR Layout, HSR Layout and so on, the government staff like stenographers and housewives have largely been given sites in areas like BTM IV Stage, possibly indicating a conscious method of allotting sites based on the real estate market.

Here’s  a scan of one page of allottees. Click on the image to enlarge.

RELATED
RELATED

Related Articles

Should MLAs be given BDA 50 x 80 sites for Rs 8 lakhs?
Special BDA site allotment to journalists divides media community

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…