Shanthinagar candidates make big promises

Transparency, accountability, citizen participation - the women contesting from Shanthinagar ward promised all this and much more at a recent public interaction.

"Women are more available and more transparent than the men," said Kathyayini Chamaraj, Secretary of Shanthinagar Residents Development Association (SHRED). With BBMP council elections just round the corner, residents of Shanthinagar (Ward 117) assembled to meet with the candidates contesting from their ward.

SHRED, in association with Citizens Welfare Association of Richard Town and Langford Town organised this programme.

Col. Fredrick D’souza, President of SHRED said that garbage, road and stray dogs are the major problems of this area.

Kathyayini echoed the expectations of the ward. She said that the ward communities should meet at a public place every month. Planning, and more importantly, auditing of the funds was expected from these meetings. "We are lucky that ten women are running for this election. None of them has any criminal record", she added.

This video has been compiled by Gourab Das, a student at the Indian Institute of Journalism and New Media.

All the candidates seemed to be in agreement about the responsibilities and duties expected from them.

The candidates were given a set of questions to answer. Each of them asserted that their endeavours would be manifestations of complete transparency. There will be a book, which will show the funds allocated and spent, they said.

Among the candidates present, C Rathna of National Congress Party, refused to speak saying her husband would speak instead of her. The audience refused to allow this. This candidate did not speak throughout the debate, despite remaining on stage.

Jayanthi G, the JD(S) candidate said that she has been in the party for seven years. "I will consult all the people. I will try to solve the problem of encroachment. I will work towards a corruption-free place," she said.

Leela G, an independent candidate said that she would do whatever is decided in the often-held meeting. "I will give you all the details of the budget".

The residents, on their part, were hopeful that their grievances would soon be heard. "Transparency is what we want. Usually after the election, the big political leaders intervene and matters tend to go out of hand," said Sumitha, a resident of this ward. She said that usually the budget allocated is not huge, thus the priorities should be set. The residents hope that the women who have come forward would be able to maintain the situation. "Usually the man in the household rules. We do not want that to happen over here," said Sumitha.

Seema Khanum, another independent candidate said that civic amenities and education are her main targets.

The candidates were all affirmative that it is the ‘people’ who play an important role and promised to involve them in the decision-making. "We give ideas, we also need a feedback. We need to know what is to be done, and what not to be done. We are not doing business," added Khanum.

⊕

References
 

Comments:

  1. Kathyayini Chamaraj says:

    Dear Chandreyee,

    Thanks for covering this event. I would just like to add that all nine women contestants out of ten (one contestant is not campaigning) appeared for the debate, although at different times. But a majority of them sat for almost one hour and listened to the speeches of all other contestants and stayed on for the interaction. Ms Sowmya of the Congress party came after the others left at 6.55 PM and stayed and interacted with citizens till 7.30 PM. Around 85 citizens attended the interaction.

    And just two small corrections. The President of SHRED is Col. Fredrick D’Sa and not D’Souza and the Citizens’ Welfare Association is of Richmond Town and Langford Town and not Richards Town.

    Sincerely,
    Kathyayini Chamaraj

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

PG collapse in Delhi’s Satya Niketan: Who is responsible?

A DU PG collapse exposes the gap between Delhi's planning rules and real building safety. Watch this video to know more.

On September 6, a five-storey boys' Paying Guest (PG) accommodation collapsed in Satya Niketan, near Delhi University's South Campus, leaving seven people dead. This video looks beyond the single building to ask how the neighbourhood reached this point. Delhi has had a formal planning system since the DDA was set up in 1957 and the first Master Plan followed in 1962. Yet Satya Niketan has grown into a dense student housing hub. Officials say the collapsed building had permission for only the ground plus first floors. Ayush Anilal, an architect, studied the area for his thesis. He explains how intensely…

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…