Shanthinagar candidates make big promises

Transparency, accountability, citizen participation - the women contesting from Shanthinagar ward promised all this and much more at a recent public interaction.

"Women are more available and more transparent than the men," said Kathyayini Chamaraj, Secretary of Shanthinagar Residents Development Association (SHRED). With BBMP council elections just round the corner, residents of Shanthinagar (Ward 117) assembled to meet with the candidates contesting from their ward.

SHRED, in association with Citizens Welfare Association of Richard Town and Langford Town organised this programme.

Col. Fredrick D’souza, President of SHRED said that garbage, road and stray dogs are the major problems of this area.

Kathyayini echoed the expectations of the ward. She said that the ward communities should meet at a public place every month. Planning, and more importantly, auditing of the funds was expected from these meetings. "We are lucky that ten women are running for this election. None of them has any criminal record", she added.

This video has been compiled by Gourab Das, a student at the Indian Institute of Journalism and New Media.

All the candidates seemed to be in agreement about the responsibilities and duties expected from them.

The candidates were given a set of questions to answer. Each of them asserted that their endeavours would be manifestations of complete transparency. There will be a book, which will show the funds allocated and spent, they said.

Among the candidates present, C Rathna of National Congress Party, refused to speak saying her husband would speak instead of her. The audience refused to allow this. This candidate did not speak throughout the debate, despite remaining on stage.

Jayanthi G, the JD(S) candidate said that she has been in the party for seven years. "I will consult all the people. I will try to solve the problem of encroachment. I will work towards a corruption-free place," she said.

Leela G, an independent candidate said that she would do whatever is decided in the often-held meeting. "I will give you all the details of the budget".

The residents, on their part, were hopeful that their grievances would soon be heard. "Transparency is what we want. Usually after the election, the big political leaders intervene and matters tend to go out of hand," said Sumitha, a resident of this ward. She said that usually the budget allocated is not huge, thus the priorities should be set. The residents hope that the women who have come forward would be able to maintain the situation. "Usually the man in the household rules. We do not want that to happen over here," said Sumitha.

Seema Khanum, another independent candidate said that civic amenities and education are her main targets.

The candidates were all affirmative that it is the ‘people’ who play an important role and promised to involve them in the decision-making. "We give ideas, we also need a feedback. We need to know what is to be done, and what not to be done. We are not doing business," added Khanum.

References
 

Comments:

  1. Kathyayini Chamaraj says:

    Dear Chandreyee,

    Thanks for covering this event. I would just like to add that all nine women contestants out of ten (one contestant is not campaigning) appeared for the debate, although at different times. But a majority of them sat for almost one hour and listened to the speeches of all other contestants and stayed on for the interaction. Ms Sowmya of the Congress party came after the others left at 6.55 PM and stayed and interacted with citizens till 7.30 PM. Around 85 citizens attended the interaction.

    And just two small corrections. The President of SHRED is Col. Fredrick D’Sa and not D’Souza and the Citizens’ Welfare Association is of Richmond Town and Langford Town and not Richards Town.

    Sincerely,
    Kathyayini Chamaraj

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…