Bus stand demolition put on hold

First BBMP started tearing down in-use bus shelters to replace them with new ones. Then citizens objected for a range of reasons.

With the public objecting to a recent move to pull down old bus shelters and replace them with new ones, the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has now ordered the private firms (who were awarded the contracts) to stop dismantling these shelters temporarily. (Bus shelters are also called bus stands.)

In a decision taken about ten days ago, after media reports and objections from citizens, the advertisement department of the BBMP has decided to first conduct an inspection before proceeding with the work. Says Hari Narayan, Assistant Executive Engineer, Advertisement department, "We have told them not to dismantle until joint inspection. Wherever they have already removed, work will continue."

Narayan says the BBMP’s plans were to change all the bus shelters to a similar model and that was why these bus shelters were being pulled down. These new bus shelters are Model D which comes with a kiosk and side panels. The older ones are Models A, B or C.

In October 2009, the BBMP’s Advertisement department had called for tenders to build 288 bus shelters in the city. Of these 230 bus shelters will replace old ones while the remaining are at new locations. These tenders were awarded in December 2009 to five firms – Skyline, Vantage, Movva, Ripple Media and OOH.

Bus Shelter - Museum Rd

Work had begun on putting up a bus shelter at this spot on Museum Road. But the traffic police objected to it, as it was too close to the circle near the State Bank of India office. As per BBMP orders, work has stopped mid-way, with the foundation posing a threat to pedestrians. Pic: Vaishnavi Vittal

The traffic police objected to putting up a bus shelter close to the circle on Museum Road. Work has been stalled temporarily, on BBMP orders.

Even as the advertisers began work on them, members of the public started objecting to it. Narayan explains that there have been several objections to the location of the bus shelters. While in some places, shopkeepers objected to bus shelters in front of their shops, in other places drainage work has prevented the advertisers from installing the bus shelter.

On Museum Road, near the head office of the State bank of India, the advertisers had already started work on erecting the bus shelter. But Narayan says that the traffic police objected to this as it was too close to the circle and will affect traffic. "They asked us to build it a few metres behind", he says. Previously, the bus shelter on this road was on the right hand side. Since the road is a one-way, the BBMP decided to build it on the left hand side.

Similarly on Brigade Road, Narayan says that a developer objected to the bus shelter proposed to be put up just outside his property near Eva Mall.

Bus shelter at Brigade Road

A builder on Brigade Road objected to installing a bus shelter just outside his property. The BBMP has put a hold on this for now. Pic: Vaishnavi Vittal

On Cunningham Road, businesspersons and shop keepers are objecting to the bus shelter opposite Sigma mall.

The BBMP has therefore decided to stall the work. "We will do an inspection. This can be done only next month after the elections are over", says Narayan.

The BBMP has also received complaints from citizens that bus shelters that are in good condition are also being torn down.

So far around 50 to 60 bus shelters have been replaced with these new models. The remaining will be completed once the BBMP meets next month.

BMTC in-charge of bus shelters after contracts expire

Bus shelter chopped

Remnants of a bus shelter that has been torn down in Jayanagar 4th block. Pic: Chetan Boray

Meanwhile, these are also the last set of bus shelters that are being constructed and will be managed by the BBMP. The state government has recently taken a decision to hand over responsibility for building and maintaining bus shelters to the BMTC. Once the current contracts expire, the BMTC will take over and call for new tenders. Narayan confirms that the BBMP’s advertisement department will not be in-charge of the bus shelters after that.

For these 288 bus shelters, the private firms will maintain it for the next five years. This includes arranging to clean the bus shelters and surroundings twice daily, repairing any damage, illumination at night and to protect the shelters from vandalism by arranging security to protect them with all amenities, fixtures and advertisements.

For the time being however, the BBMP has taken a decision to stall work on this project temporarily.

 

Comments:

  1. frg says:

    Bus stops are integral part of the streets. How come they are considered temporary? Ideally they should be constructed and then only maintained by any agency.
    Are there vested interests involved in removing as well as rebuilding bus stops?

  2. Muralidhar Rao says:

    So, the whole purpose appears to be to exploit the last opportunity to make money on this account before it passes over to the BMTC for them to continue the process.

    I saw one of the new shelters adjoining the Mahatma Gandhi park/ KSCA stadium. It’s plainly horrendous. The earlier ones were certainly elegant.

  3. Srikanth Parthasarathy says:

    Let them make a proper inspection and plan it effectively. There are many bus stops just after the traffic signals and the major circles that causes traffic jams. Even if there is a green signal, because of these bus stands just after the signals, traffic just does not move. This is a pathetic way of planning. Hopefully the new bus shelters are well planned and placed accordingly to avoid blockages.

  4. Narasim Katary says:

    Ms Vittal has highlighted a classic dilemma in public policy very well.

    What is in the interest of most is not necessarily in the interest of some. Bus Shelters is just one case in point.

    The dilemma stems from a self-evident reality, namely, benefits are global but impacts are local. In principle there is no solution to this but in practice there is a solution. Public authorities can attempt to ensure that a majority benefit does not cause an unacceptable adverse impact on abutting properties.

    Citizen Matters has done a great public service by bringing attention to this eternal dilemma. Bravo!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Road safety: Accidents continue, measures inadequate

The infuriating hit and run Porsche case in Pune, is still on people’s minds, and now another case of hit an run, this time in Mumbai’s Worli, hit headlines, raising serious questions about road safety. Mihir Shah, son of a Shiv Sena (Eknath Shinde) leader, is accused of hitting a couple on a scooter and dragging the wife on the bonnet of the car instead of stopping the car, resulting in her death. He has been arrested and sent to judicial custody. Victim’s husband, on a video, said that if the driver of the vehicle had stopped the car, his…

Similar Story

Train travails at Chennai Central signal dire need to solve overcrowding

Overcrowding in trains bound from Chennai to faraway places points to an urgent need for additional trains to ease the rush.

Last month, news reports emerged of ticketed passengers stranded at Chennai Central railway station. They carried bonafide tickets for seats on a train bound for Howrah, but discovered that unauthorised travellers had occupied their coaches; it is said that people began to board the train even as the railcars were entering the platform so that the sleeper coaches were full by the time they made a stop at the station. According to a report in The Hindu, ticketless passengers had not only overrun the reserved coaches but also blocked walkways with their luggage, making it impossible for those who had…