The fast lane from Hebbal to Silk Board gets a push

Stakeholders DULT, BMTC, BDA and consultants RITES, iDECK will meet next week to review the revised proposal for the pilot Bus Rapid Transit System in Bengaluru.

Come February 16th and it will be a crucial day for the first Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) proposal for Bangalore. Karnataka’s Directorate of Urban Land Transport (DULT) has called for a meeting of the BDA, BMTC, Rail India Technical and Economic Society (RITES) and Infrastructure Development Corporation ( Karnataka) Limited (iDECK) on that day to discuss the BRTS proposal. In BRTS, BMTC buses will run higher speeds than usual in part because of dedicates bus lanes, allowing commuters to reach destinations faster.

If the BRTS gets the Cabinet nod, it will first be implemented along the Outer Ring Road, between Hebbal and Central Silkboard. Bus lanes will be incorporated in the designs of grade separator projects along this corridor. (Click on image to view map) Courtesy: Google Maps

Mohammad Mohsin, Member Convenor, Bangalore Metropolitan Land Transport Authority (BMLTA) and Director, Urban Land Transport, says that the meeting is being held to review the Detailed Project Report (DPR) for the Hebbal-Central Silk Board sector. A DPR is a base document for planning a project and implementing it. It includes technical specifications, schedule plan, investment decision-making and so on.

The BRTS along the Outer Ring Road (ORR) between Central Silk Board and Hebbal junctions is a 29.6 km stretch and will be taken up as the first project after Cabinet approval. Mohsin says that project will cost approximately Rs 15 crores per kilometre.

The DPR for the BRTS was commissioned by the BDA from RITES and iDECK, with the former responsible for technical content and the latter for the financing plan. RITES in a Government of India enterprise. Deputy General Manager of RITES, S Jyothirmayee says that they originally submitted the DPR to iDECK way back in November 2007. iDECK is a 10-year-old joint venture firm between the Government of Karnataka (GoK), Infrastructure Development Finance Company Ltd. (IDFC), and Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd (HDFC). "iDECK submitted it to the BDA in the first week of December 2007," says Jyothirmayee.

After a series of a meetings, nothing concrete happened with regard to this plan, says Jyothirmayee, adding that the BDA wanted certain modifications to the report. Subsequently, as the BDA planned on making ORR signal-free, with seven to eight grade separator projects, Jyothirmayee says that they were then asked to make changes to the DPR. She says that they resubmitted the DPR in December 2009 through iDECK.

After the February 16th meeting, Mohsin says that the BMLTA will organise a public consultation, the date of which will be announced soon. The BMLTA will also organise a workshop on BRTS on February 26th, for the benefit of various stakeholders in the government and some NGOs. After this, the DPR will be placed before the BMLTA committee headed by the Chief Secretary, Government of Karnataka, he adds. "After the approval (of) the BMLTA the matter will be going before the Cabinet for approval. It is difficult to give time line but government is serious to implement it as fast as possible," says Mohsin.

BDA to incorporate bus lanes in ORR grade separator projects

BDA’s Executive Engineer (Infrastructure Division 1 – Central Silk Board to KR Puram along Outer Ring Road), Nagaraj Murthy, says they are studying the DPR. He says BRTS corridors will be incorporated across ten grade separator projects that are being planned on ORR at the following junctions – HSR 14th Main, Agara, Iblur, Bellandur, Devarabeesanahalli, Kadusbeesanahalli, Mahadevapura, Kalyannagar, Hennur and Veerannapalya.

Take the case of the Agara and Iblur flyover projects. The Iblur flyover design already includes two BRTS lanes, each measuring 3.5 meters in width and 642 meters in length. A bus bay measuring 2.5 meters in width, is also indicated in the drawing. In the Agara project drawing, the bus lanes are indicated in between the flyovers, measuring 0.6 meters in width. One of the bus lanes will be directed towards Iblur and the other towards Silk Board. You can read a detailed report on these flyover designs here.

Murthy says that at the February 16th meeting, the BDA will insist on funding from the BMTC as they will benefit the most from the BRTS.

Citizens interact with DULT Chief over BRT

On January 20th 2010, Citizen Matters published the BRTS proposal, authored by Mohsin. In response to this, several readers wrote in with questions on the proposal. While some were apprehensive about the project itself, others asked why existing modes of transport were not being strengthened. Mohsin responded to these queries and suggestions.

He noted that BRTS is a step towards strengthening the existing bus service. Once the Central Silk Board-Hebbal corridor project is done, he says it will be taken up on other major corridors, phase-wise. One reader Srivatsa Vajapeyam suggested building of a single-lane magic underpass (like the one at Cauvery junction) at a junction/signal so that buses do not have to wait at the signal. Mohsin said that the DULT will consider this suggestion of magic boxes designed only for BRT buses. Mohsin also said that there is no space inside the city for dedicated bus corridors, but there is space at Ring Roads and major roads which have to be redesigned with some geometric adjustments and engineering.

Even as Mohsin says that no timeframe can be given for implementing BRTS, all eyes will now be on the February 16th meeting, called by the DULT.   ⊕

RELATED
RELATED

Related Articles

Bus Rapid Transport for Bangalore, today or tomorrow?

Comments:

  1. Srikanth Parthasarathy says:

    Thank you for this update on the fast lane. Hopefully, the meeting on 16th Feb turns out fruitful for Bengaluru. And the project kick starts soon!

  2. RAM PRASAD says:

    This project will be of no use to the daily commuting citizen. The current investments in outer ring road to convert hebbal to silkboard is sufficient. We need to now look at the other side of the Ringroad connecting into BTM,Jayanagar and Banshankari. The same money can be used to fix the infrastructure bottle necks in the outer ring road connecting silk board to mysore road.

  3. RAM PRASAD says:

    Correction..
    This project will be of no use to the daily commuting citizen. The current investments in outer ring road to connect hebbal to silkboard is sufficient. We need to now look at the other side of the Ringroad connecting into BTM,Jayanagar and Banshankari. The same money can be used to fix the infrastructure bottle necks in the outer ring road connecting silk board to mysore road.

  4. deekshith says:

    Brts is a good idea for instinct! But it cannot survive for longer with population growth and vehicle growth! There wont be any much difference! I hav a better idea!

  5. deekshith says:

    Hi, i am deekshith persuing my final year be in civil engineering in new horizon college of engineering kadubeesenahalli. I am travelling in this route from past 4 years. It needs a fine traffic solution. As my academic final year project i hav taken this problem into consideration and there is a new future mode of transportation called elevated land bus check out this link ” https://youtu.be/uO5asUTbCR0 ” this suits perfecty for that strech of 10 lane road! V are doing our project on designing track for this streach of road from silkboard to hebbal. Considering the advantages and disadvantages! And finally coming to its conclusion abt its suitability, suistainability, either its feasible or not. And how much it can contribute for the public. Hoping towards success.

  6. deekshith says:

    I would feel great to know your support and suggestions. Ill b glad to take your support as other part of engineering works like mechanical, electrical and others! Plz come forward to reply! I would feel great!

  7. deekshith says:

    If this mode of transport comes out be reliable This mode of transportation can b inplimented in future happening smart cities.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

,

Maharashtra cities need a mobility fix: Building roads not a solution

Mumbai and other urban centres in Maharashtra have seen a surge in vehicle ownership, while public transport needs have not been met.

Maharashtra, one of India’s most urbanised States, faces a transportation crisis that has snowballed into a public health, environmental, and economic challenge. With over half its population residing in urban areas, Maharashtra is home to 28 municipal corporations — the highest in the country. Cities like Mumbai and Pune are struggling with the relentless surge in vehicle ownership, which has led to traffic congestion, alarming pollution levels, and a steep rise in road crashes.  Despite these pressing concerns, many cities have pursued an approach focused on expanding road infrastructure, relying on flyovers and highways to absorb traffic overflow. However, experts…

Similar Story

Walkability and affordable transit ignored as elections focus on big projects in Mumbai

Political parties are harping on big-ticket projects, while hardly anyone is focusing on the city's lifelines — BEST and railways.

As the Maharashtra state elections get underway, the daily struggles of Mumbai's citizens, especially their commuting woes, seem to be overlooked in the electoral discourse. Political parties are focusing on massive infrastructure projects, sidelining the city's lifelines like the Railways and the Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport (BEST) Undertaking in favour of the Metro Rail. Despite being partially operational, the Metro has yet to make a significant impact. Surveys reveal that 52% of Mumbaikars walk to work, yet on many roads, pedestrian infrastructure remains neglected, encroached upon, and unusable. While traffic congestion has made commuting a nightmare, trains are perennially…