Democracy needs proactive participation

I managed to vote but others not so lucky didn't find their names in the rolls.

Yes, I voted, with a name that was not only spelt wrong, but strangely had an extra word as well – "Meja Pramod Kumar".

Over two months ago, I had submitted the form for changing the errors in my name to the ARO, and had got his signed receipt. When I applied for the ID card last month, I realised my name was still listed incorrectly. To avoid missing a chance to vote, I got the same name printed on my ID card. (Now that this election is over, I need to start the process of applying for corrections in the rolls and getting another EPIC card all over again, but that will be another story.)

I voted and waited outside the booth for quite some time to see the reactions from people when they came out. In the 40 minutes that I spent in this exercise, at least 25 to 30 people came out angry at not finding their names on the list. Some carried their EPIC cards, and some others carried their passports or driving licenses etc. but they could not find their names on the list. They were more angry than disappointed. When I asked them why they had not verified if their names were included in the voters list, especially when enough publicity and time were given, many had no answer. Apathy, complacency or what?

Why are we complaining and blaming the system when we are not proactively participating in the process ourselves? That the entire system of enumeration and logging the data accurately need a total flip and overhaul is acknowledged and accepted. This time, there was a private firm which was given the responsibility of issuing ID cards. What a mess they made of it. Why? Because the authorities selected a company that had poor credentials and no accountability. One had to experience the quality and lack of enthusiasm of the people manning these booths. It was frightening.

I intend to interact with Mr. M.N. Vidyashankar (Chief Electoral Officer) and pass on suggestions on improving the process. If you have any ideas on this, please do share them; I would like to interact with you ⊕

Comments:

  1. Purnima Coontoor says:

    My sentiments exactly. While I admire the elction commission for pulling off elections almost every year in the world’s largest democracy,the non-inclusion of thousands of legitimate voters in the list was unpardonable. The issue of voter id cards was an entirely goofed up affair. Like Mr. Kapur points out, the agencies chosen to issue id cards were arrogant and inneficeint. They were rude and impatient, and treated people who had queued up as if they were morons. I had to fight to get my name spelt right too. But many meekly took ‘no’ for an answer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…