Bengaluru North candidates battle it out

The audience attending the debate were given the usual spiel by the candidates, with no new promises or concrete plans for their constituencies.

It was probably for the first time that candidates from a constituency came together, sharing the same stage, to speak about their agenda and plan of action if voted to power. Supported by Smart Vote, a campaign that provides information regarding candidates standing for elections, television channel News 9 organised a constituency-wise political debate for the Bengaluru urban area.

Bangalore north candidates debate.

Bangalore north candidates debate. (Pic: Naveen Ningaiah)

The second session held in the afternoon on Tuesday, 14th April, had the candidates of Bangalore North debating. The candidates present at the event were C K Jaffer Sharief (Indian National Congress), D B Chandre Gowda (BJP), Surendra Babu (JD(S)), M Tippuvardhan (Bharatiya Praja Paksha), Zafer Mohiuddin (Independent) and V Prasanna Kumar (Independent).

The session started with each of the candidates introducing themselves and explaining the problems plaguing Bangalore North. Prasanna Kumar’s pitch was that he is a local candidate and is familiar with the problems of the area. “Political parties have not helped in any way. That is why I am contesting now,” he said.

Chandre Gowda, a three-time MP and four-time MLA spoke about the objectives of the constitution and the multiple problems in Bengaluru. Water supply is the major problem in the city, he said. Gowda is now with the BJP, having moved recently from the Congress.

It was then the turn of consulting architect Zafer Mohiuddin, whose main purpose of contesting is to get the youth to vote. “Traffic, pollution, civic amenities. These are the problems I’ll address,” he said. Veteran C K Jaffer Sharief said, “After losing last time, I want to win now. I will then think of retiring.” Sharief spoke about his being responsible for Bangalore’s famous hanging bridge at K R Puram and his achievements as a Railway Minister.

It was then the turn of 40-year-old Tippu Vardhan who said straight and clear, “Our nation is facing a lot of problems. I want to serve the public.” JD(S) candidate Surendra Babu’s selling point was, “I am young and educated.” The 44-year-old agriculturist and lawyer stuck to talking about the way amendments are made in parliament according to “the whims and fancies of those in power”.

It was then time for the audience to shoot their questions. The first question about the alarming water crisis in the city, was met with some very vague answers, with each candidate promising to “certainly take it up if I am elected”.

Seventy-six year old Sharief was asked, after four terms, what unfinished work he has that people should vote for him now. “Government work is continuous work. Few important issues are there which are not in the hands of one MP. We will have to follow party line,” he replied, adding that water, infrastructure and power are the main problems in the city.

Another member of the audience brought up the issue of corruption and why the Lok Ayukta is not empowered, to which Babu brought up the issue of amendments again. “Politicans need to come clean. We need to question politicians. Right now we can do it only to a certain extent. Ruling party prevents such an investigaton,” he said. Gowda responded with the BJP’s mantra of “good and clean governance”, while Sharief said corruption takes place because people are anxious to get things done. Mohiuddin pointed out that people who give bribes are also as corrupt, to which Babu shot back saying the public cannot be blamed and that it is the government that needs to keep a check on this.

The candidates were then asked what according to them was the pressing issue facing the nation. Security, corruption, unemployment and caste were some of the answers.

Bangalore north candidates

Bangalore north candidates, from Left: Chandre Gowda, Surendra Babu and Jaffer Shareif (Pic: Naveen Ningaiah)

The session ended with each of the candidates stating out their vision for Bengaluru. Mohiuddin said the city’s infrastructure needs to be planned by urban planners and not politicians. “We need to look at the convenience of the people,” he said.

Sharief spoke about bringing back the vision of Sir H N Vishveshwarayya, Kempegowda and C V Raman. Prasanna Kumar said, “Everyone is a crook. That’s why I am contesting. They will only talk. Vote for youth.” Vardhan said the issues of roads, drainage and infrastructure need to be addressed. Surendra Babu said outer Bangalore needs to be developed and also that MPs should not wash off their hands after five years.

The ‘bombaat verdict’ ended with many from the audience disappointed that they did not get entirely satisfactory answers. As the candidates debated and argued about communalism, two party system and multi party system, water supply and so on, Surendra Babu’s statement lingers, “Mind is not applied in parliament. Application of mind is needed.”

Comments:

  1. Vivek Chandran says:

    Nice article. I missed the debate, now i wish i had known about it.
    Their replies leave me undecided though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Are building regulations followed in Bengaluru? A case study in Vijayanagar

One of the teams in a recent Bengaluru design jam explored the conformity of buildings to existing rules in Vijayanagar's residential areas.

The extension of 3rd Cross road in Vijayanagar is like any emerging neighbourhood in Bengaluru, with houses packed like boxes on either side. This led us to explore the role of regulations in shaping our buildings, streets and city at large. We presented our findings at the ‘Bengaluru Design Jam’, organised by organised by OpenCity, and held on July 6th. The participants collaborated to analyse and interpret different aspects of BBMP’s construction bye-laws.  The changes and growth of cities are often guided by economic activities. But the development of cities needs to be managed and regulated to ensure liveability. This…

Similar Story

Tackling domestic violence: Chennai’s resettlement sites to get one-stop centres

The TNUHDB has also established the first de-addiction centre in the Kannagi Nagar resettlement area in Chennai and more support centres are planned.

Evictions do not affect men and women equally. Often, women bear the brunt, be it because of unplanned evictions or domestic violence that results from loss of livelihood. With no government facilities in place to turn to for help, the women in Chennai's resettlement areas often suffer in silence. To address this issue, the Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board (TNUHDB) will soon establish 'one-stop centres' in resettlement areas in the city. Meanwhile, a residential de-addiction centre has also been set up in Kannagi Nagar to tackle substance abuse, especially among young men and boys. Our earlier articles in this…