Bengaluru North candidates battle it out

The audience attending the debate were given the usual spiel by the candidates, with no new promises or concrete plans for their constituencies.

It was probably for the first time that candidates from a constituency came together, sharing the same stage, to speak about their agenda and plan of action if voted to power. Supported by Smart Vote, a campaign that provides information regarding candidates standing for elections, television channel News 9 organised a constituency-wise political debate for the Bengaluru urban area.

Bangalore north candidates debate.

Bangalore north candidates debate. (Pic: Naveen Ningaiah)

The second session held in the afternoon on Tuesday, 14th April, had the candidates of Bangalore North debating. The candidates present at the event were C K Jaffer Sharief (Indian National Congress), D B Chandre Gowda (BJP), Surendra Babu (JD(S)), M Tippuvardhan (Bharatiya Praja Paksha), Zafer Mohiuddin (Independent) and V Prasanna Kumar (Independent).

The session started with each of the candidates introducing themselves and explaining the problems plaguing Bangalore North. Prasanna Kumar’s pitch was that he is a local candidate and is familiar with the problems of the area. “Political parties have not helped in any way. That is why I am contesting now,” he said.

Chandre Gowda, a three-time MP and four-time MLA spoke about the objectives of the constitution and the multiple problems in Bengaluru. Water supply is the major problem in the city, he said. Gowda is now with the BJP, having moved recently from the Congress.

It was then the turn of consulting architect Zafer Mohiuddin, whose main purpose of contesting is to get the youth to vote. “Traffic, pollution, civic amenities. These are the problems I’ll address,” he said. Veteran C K Jaffer Sharief said, “After losing last time, I want to win now. I will then think of retiring.” Sharief spoke about his being responsible for Bangalore’s famous hanging bridge at K R Puram and his achievements as a Railway Minister.

It was then the turn of 40-year-old Tippu Vardhan who said straight and clear, “Our nation is facing a lot of problems. I want to serve the public.” JD(S) candidate Surendra Babu’s selling point was, “I am young and educated.” The 44-year-old agriculturist and lawyer stuck to talking about the way amendments are made in parliament according to “the whims and fancies of those in power”.

It was then time for the audience to shoot their questions. The first question about the alarming water crisis in the city, was met with some very vague answers, with each candidate promising to “certainly take it up if I am elected”.

Seventy-six year old Sharief was asked, after four terms, what unfinished work he has that people should vote for him now. “Government work is continuous work. Few important issues are there which are not in the hands of one MP. We will have to follow party line,” he replied, adding that water, infrastructure and power are the main problems in the city.

Another member of the audience brought up the issue of corruption and why the Lok Ayukta is not empowered, to which Babu brought up the issue of amendments again. “Politicans need to come clean. We need to question politicians. Right now we can do it only to a certain extent. Ruling party prevents such an investigaton,” he said. Gowda responded with the BJP’s mantra of “good and clean governance”, while Sharief said corruption takes place because people are anxious to get things done. Mohiuddin pointed out that people who give bribes are also as corrupt, to which Babu shot back saying the public cannot be blamed and that it is the government that needs to keep a check on this.

The candidates were then asked what according to them was the pressing issue facing the nation. Security, corruption, unemployment and caste were some of the answers.

Bangalore north candidates

Bangalore north candidates, from Left: Chandre Gowda, Surendra Babu and Jaffer Shareif (Pic: Naveen Ningaiah)

The session ended with each of the candidates stating out their vision for Bengaluru. Mohiuddin said the city’s infrastructure needs to be planned by urban planners and not politicians. “We need to look at the convenience of the people,” he said.

Sharief spoke about bringing back the vision of Sir H N Vishveshwarayya, Kempegowda and C V Raman. Prasanna Kumar said, “Everyone is a crook. That’s why I am contesting. They will only talk. Vote for youth.” Vardhan said the issues of roads, drainage and infrastructure need to be addressed. Surendra Babu said outer Bangalore needs to be developed and also that MPs should not wash off their hands after five years.

The ‘bombaat verdict’ ended with many from the audience disappointed that they did not get entirely satisfactory answers. As the candidates debated and argued about communalism, two party system and multi party system, water supply and so on, Surendra Babu’s statement lingers, “Mind is not applied in parliament. Application of mind is needed.”

Comments:

  1. Vivek Chandran says:

    Nice article. I missed the debate, now i wish i had known about it.
    Their replies leave me undecided though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…