Bangalore South candidates engage in lively debate

The experienced campaigners looked more relaxed and confident than the first timers. All of them engaged the audience, but rarely responded with specifics.

I am the aam admi that these khas aadmis are talking about.

Parties spend crores on their campaigns. Corruption starts right there.

People should stop spreading hatred, as that is the source of all ills.

These were some of the lines uttered by Lok Sabha candidates for the Bengaluru South Constituency at a debate on 14th April at Sathya Sai Samskruthi Sadan, behind Forum, Koramangala on Hosur Road.

Candidates on the stage included Krishna Byregowda (INC), Prof K E Radhakrishna (JD(S)), Dr H G Jayalakshmi (SUCI), Capt G R Gopinath (Independent), K C Janardhan (Independent), Santosh Min (Independent) and H N Ananth Kumar (BJP).

Bangalore south candidates debate. (Pic: Naveen Ningaiah)

Bangalore south candidates debate. (Pic: Naveen Ningaiah)

SmartVote, a group of Bengaluru-based citizens working on providing candidate information to Bengaluru’s voters and News9, the television news channel, organised the debate, Bombaat Verdict.

Proceedings kicked off with candidates introducing themselves and speaking about their vision for the city.

BJP’s Ananth Kumar stressed the need to have politics with camaraderie and sportsmanship. He appealed to voters to select the BJP, for they stand for national security, economic progress and ongoing development. He also promised a clean, green and living-friendly (sic) Bangalore.

Krishna Byregowda pointed out how the Congress-led UPA has provided a stable pro-poor government in the last four years, and has come up with programmes like JNNURM, NREGA, Rural Health Mission, Energy Mission and so on. He promised to encourage public participation if elected.

Santosh Min, a former Claims analyst pointed out that he is the “aam admi that these khas aadmis are talking about”. He said he stands for harmonious living and national integration.

Capt. Gopinath, of Air Deccan fame, said the terrorist attacks and the recent attacks on women made him come out of his cocoon. He claimed all political parties offer tickets based on caste and creed. He said, “Parties spend crores on their campaigns. Corruption starts right there.” As an independent he does not have a high command to bow to. “My constituents are my high command,” he said, “I will consult the people of Bangalore south when voting on bills in Parliament.”

Dr Jayalakshmi, an ayurvedic doctor, said water, drainage, health, education, all have been neglected in the last 60 years, now they are being thrown open to market forces. She said, "Political parties only cater to the needs of the rich.”

Prof. Radhakrishna, an educationist, said he stands for politics of amity and inclusion. He charged the national parties of becoming irrelevant and sectarian. He believes in the unity of diverse cultures, national outlook fused with regional aspirations. He pointed out the need for all pockets of Bangalore, including villages like Puttenahalli to be developed.

K C Janardhan, a calligraphist and consultant, said we all face obstructions in our daily life. He promised to voice the citizens’ opinion and represent them in parliament to see the change we require.

The experienced politicians looked more relaxed and confident than the first timers. Though all of them were open to engaging with the audience, they rarely responded with specifics, preferring to stick with rhetoric.

The compere then moved onto asking specific questions to the candidates, to be followed by questions from the audience.

On the question of communalism, on what the candidates would do to ensure communal harmony, the politicians mouthed the usual platitudes.

Ananth Kumar mentioned the Vajpayee mantra, Hindu Muslim Bhai Bhai, Bharat mata hamara maa hai. Byregowda talked about one India and said people should stop spreading hatred, as that is the source of all ills.

Santhosh Min plans an amendment to redefine secularism; at the local level, he will encourage people-people interaction and felt that religion should be private. Prof Radhakrishna alleged the national parties have destroyed social fabric.

On the economic downturn

Next, the candidates were asked what they would do to alleviate the financial crisis.

Santosh Min said FDI and globalisation is not the answer. “HR (Human Resources) is most important. If we make cities habitable, people (who have emigrated) will come back and set up firms,” he said. He felt we should delink from the global economy.

Gopinath said the there should be a right eco-system for jobs to be created – communal harmony and absence of corruption.

Ananth Kumar recounted, “In the 90’s India was going through a crisis, even our gold was mortgaged. Vajpayee initiated the golden quadrilateral and other connectivity projects; he instilled confidence in the people.”

Gopinath charged all the political parties with failing to do their duty, “All these years, you were in power, you have looted the economy and divided the society.” To this, Prof Radhakrishna pointed out when elections are over, independents are the first to be “bought”.

Krishna Byregowda said Congress believes in stable growth, not lured by double digit. He said, “Prices have come down in the past six months. Food prices will come down, given good monsoon.” Ananth Kumar charged the Congress of inheriting a robust economy and frittering it away.

Dr Jayalakshmi, from the left wing SUCI, was against freezing wages and layoffs. “Unless people are paid, how can they spend (to improve the economy)?” she questioned.

Quick exit

Even as the Congress, BJP and JD(S) candidates left the debate to keep their campaign appointments, the discussion continued with the audience posing their questions to the remaining candidates.

Gopinath was asked if he will end up being a lone crusader if he doesn’t align with any national party. He replied that it will send the right signal that it is possible to win without money. On the disparity between urban and rural areas, he felt basic infrastructure was essential. He advocated private transport players in addition to KSRTC.

Gopinath explained how he will get inputs from citizens by forming citizen committees including well known citizens like Mohandas Pai and Kiran Mazumdar Shaw.

At the end, the compere asked the audience, how many of them were satisfied with the answers. A sizeable number of people raised their hands, pointing to the importance of such debates in election times.

The debate will be broadcast on News9 this Friday, Saturday and Sunday, 6 PM onwards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

City Buzz: What ails the Data Protection Act? | Bengaluru’s bike taxi dilemma

All you need to know about the ongoing debate concerning the DPDP Act; and the uncertain future of bike taxis in Bengaluru.

DPDP Act sparks privacy vs transparency debate The Digital Personal Data Protection Rules (DPDP Bill 2025), drawn up by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), are designed to facilitate the implementation of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act), 2023. The DPDP Act, 2023, lays out guidelines for the collection, processing, and protection of personal data while ensuring individuals' privacy rights. The Act was passed in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha in August 2023 and subsequently received assent from the President of India. However, the DPDP Bill has stoked a controversy over its ruling on the…

Similar Story

Give the poor homes or allow them to build? Ambedkar Nagar may hold the answer

The residents of the resettlement site in Chennai have made gradual upgrades to their homes, but are yet to get formal land titles from the government.

Across Indian cities, resettlement policies have often failed to provide long-term solutions for displaced communities, leaving them with insecure tenure, inadequate infrastructure, and limited growth opportunities. These challenges become even more apparent in resettlement schemes such as Chennai's Perumbakkam, where displaced communities were relocated into government-built apartments nearly 30 kilometres away. Antony, one of the first allottees of a plot in Chennai's Ambedkar Nagar, compares plots and apartments. He explains that having land allows gradual construction and improvements. "This is best. Here, with land, we can construct over time. There (in Perumbakkam), they cannot. There, even if they have money,…