BJP fields D V Sadananda Gowda in Bangalore North

D V Sadananda Gowda is perceived as a performer, but he also has his own small share of controversies.

The ever-smiling staunch BJPian Devaragunda Venkappa Sadananda Gowda, popularly known as DVS, has been in politics since 1983. Born in 1953, he graduated in science, and had a brief stint as an advocate, before plunging headlong into politics through Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and Jan Sangh.

Hailing from Puttur of coastal Karnataka, with a strong RSS background, he became an MLA from Bharatiya Janata Party in 1994. He then contested Lok Sabha elections in 2004. He entered Lok Sabha by defeating the now-central Minister Veerappa Moily.

He headed Karnataka BJP in 2006 as its state president, and was perceived as responsible for BJP’s victory in 2008, after which Yeddyurappa became chief minister. DVS was left with the daunting task of covering up the tracks left by the party’s Operation Lotus. However, he again focussed on national politics, after being elected as MP in 2009.

But the luck came knocking his doors in 2011, when Yeddyurappa had to quit the chief minister’s post after the corruption charges were levelled on him. D V Sadananda Gowda became Karnataka’s 20th chief minister purely by chance, with B S Yeddyurappa’s support. He was seen as a safe choice by Yeddyurappa who did not want another Lingayat to replace him.

During the brief period that he was the chief minister, Gowda claims to have addressed the issue of corruption through the implementation of the Sakala scheme which aimed to provide time-bound delivery of government schemes to citizens. The scheme is still in the early stages of citizen acceptance and adoption.

As a CM, he had a tough time covering the tracks of BJP’s three years of administration in the state ridden with scams, controversies and power wars. He headed the government for over an year, after which he was replaced by Jagdish Shettar as chief minister, once again at the behest of Yeddyurappa who felt that Gowda was getting too big for his boots.

In 2013, the BJP lost power in the state elections, however DV Sadananda Gowda won from his constituency. He is remembered as one of the efficient chief ministers. The fact that he is the Lok Sabha candidate from Bangalore North could only mean that his political stock is on the rise at least within the BJP.

Brief profile:

Name: D V Sadananda Gowda

Party: BJP

Profession: Lawyer by qualification

Age: 62

Assets: Rs. 5.5 crore plus (2013)

Liabilities: Rs.1.45 crore plus

Prominent positions held:

  • Karnataka Chief Minister (August 4, 2011 – July 8, 2012)
  • Elected to the 15th Lok Sabha (2009 – December 2011) from Udupi-Chikmagalur Lok Sabha constituency
  • Elected to the 14th Lok Sabha (2004 – 2009) from Mangalore Lok Sabha constituency
  • Member of the Karnataka Legislative Assembly- 2 terms (1994-2004) from Puttur constituency

Other positions held:

15th Lok Sabha

  • Member, House Committee
  • Member, Committee on Science & Technology, Environment & Forests
  • Director, Central Coffee Board

14th Lok Sabha

  • Member, Committee on Commerce

Karnataka Assembly (1994- 2004)

  • Member, Cell for Preparing Draft Bill on Prohibiting Atrocities on Women, Government of Karnataka
  • Deputy Leader, Opposition, Karnataka Legislative Assembly
  • Member, Committee for Energy, Fuel & Power, Karnataka Legislative Assembly
  • Member, Public Undertaking Committee, Karnataka Legislative Assembly
  • President, Public Accounts Committee, Karnataka Legislative Assembly

Other positions

  • General Secretary, Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh, Puttur Division
  • President of Sullia Taluk Auto Rickshaw Drivers and Owners Union
  • Vice President of SCDCC Bank, Mangalore
  • Director, SKACM Society, Mangalore

For more details, click his website.

DVS on news

This is the first time that Sadananda Gowda is contesting from a Bangalore constituency. He is seen as a more of a state-level leader. Thus his interventions/statements have to be seen at the state level.

Some news bits involving Sadananda Gowda in the recent past:

Performance as an MP

It is pertinent to remember that Sadananda Gowda was a second-term sitting MP when he was chosen as chief minister due to which he had to vacate his Lok Sabha seat. During the two terms that he was in office, he took part in various debates relating to Karnataka. Some of them include

  • Regarding need to extend the train service between Bangalore and Mangalore up to Karwar, in Karnataka
  • Regarding need to give approval to anti-sea erosion project submitted by Government of Karnataka
  • Regarding need to allocate the full requirement of fertilizers to the State of Karnataka.
  • Illegal mining in various states
  • Water issues between the governments of Karnataka and Tamil Nadu
  • Blanket ban on the use of Endosulfan in Karnataka
  • Plight of farmers due to fall in prices of areca nut
  • Funds for completion of work of improvement of Shiradi Ghat stretch from Sakleshpura to Gundya

His focus during debates was on topics broadly related to coastal Karnataka and agriculture.

During his tenure as a member of the Lok Sabha from 2009 – 2011, he asked 72 questions. Not surprisingly, they were focussed on Karnataka. During the same period, his attendance stood at a mere 48%.

Controversy count

Sadananda Gowda fell into a big controversy when he was accused of constructing a commercial building on residential land in HSR layout, South Bangalore, by merging two plots purchased by then-minister D N Jeevaraj and himself. This was apparently done without the consent of the BDA. In October 2012, the Karnataka High Court directed the BDA to cancel the allotment of the plot to Gowda on the basis that he had violated the sanctioned plan.

Another private complaint lodged in Lokayukta Court against Sadananda Gowda filed by one Nagalakshmi Bai alleged that Gowda had bought 8.5 acres of grassland in Bagalur in 2008 by allegedly submitting fake documents, out of which 7.5 acres were a part of the 29 acre earmarked for SCs and STs by the government. However, the complaint was quashed by the High Court for the simple reason that the complainant did not take necessary sanction from the competent authority (governor).

He is also seen as the one who approved Yettinahole river diversion project, against which people of South Canara are up in arms, as the project is perceived to affect the river Netravati – the lifeline of South Canara district.

Related Articles

Fresh in politics means there’s no legacy to defend: V Balakrishnan
Balakrishnan’s Aam Aadmi campaign in Shantinagar

Comments:

  1. G. Chandrashekar says:

    Good selection. Hope he will take care of the constituency. Needs to interact with people with effective coordination.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…