Fostering Freedom of Expression – BLF & beyond

The excitement around the upcoming Bangalore Literary Festival has been marred by controversy. Writers threatening to boycott the festival and founding director Vikram Sampath stepping down has raised many questions in the minds of Bangaloreans.

The good news first. Thanks to social media, citizens across the country are weighing in with their opinions on a variety of issues. The bad news is the tone and tenor of many of these discussions leaves much to be desired. Ironically, many commenters have been intolerant in the ongoing debate about intolerance in our nation. Some of this has coloured the discussion around the Bangalore Literary Festival.

According to Nobel laureate Nadine Gordimer a writer’s freedom was his “right to maintain and publish to the world a deep, intense, private view of the situation in which he finds his society. If he is to work as well as he can, he must take, and be granted, freedom from the public conformity of political interpretation, morals and tastes.”

To me, a literary festival is a platform where not just writers but citizens can discuss a variety of issues germane to our lives as Bangaloreans and Indians. Even more importantly, it’s a rare opportunity to bring a variety of different voices and dissenting opinions to bear on matters that we don’t agree upon. A city such as Bangalore, with its myriad problems needs to nurture community forums with active citizen participation to have meaningful discussions that can inform right action. I believe that the Bangalore Literary Festival is one such forum.

Freedom of expression is one of the rights granted to citizens of this country even if it does come with qualifiers. If writers are returning awards as a sign of protest, it is their prerogative to do so. But boycotting a literary festival for not aligning themselves with the personal viewpoints of the festival director is disheartening for society. Vikram Sampath has demonstrated in his actions that the festival is above any single individual and it is equally diappointing to hear that he has put in his papers as director of the organizing committee.

As a pratising classical musician I am no stranger to petty politics in the music world. In June or July, the Sangita Kalanidhi awardee is announced by the Music Academy for the upcoming December music festival in Chennai. It is the most prestigious award given to a Carnatic musician for his or her contribution to the art form. The award comes with its share of controversy over the selection of the awardee among musicians and rasikas alike. However in no way has this hampered the spirit of the music festival which has grown to be the globally pre-eminent Carnatic festival.

The question that we need to ask ourselves is that by boycotting any festival, are we throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Can we look beyond the personal and political to continue to grow our communities?

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The crisis choking small and mid-sized cities: Can you feel it in the air?

Systemic lack of attention limits data and interventions in our severely polluted small and mid-sized cities, say authors of a recent report.

In the larger narrative on climate change and urbanisation, the plight of India’s small and mid-sized cities has mostly slipped through the cracks. Not that the global and national media is oblivious to the stellar rankings, which highlight that 15 of top 20 most polluted cities are in India. However, the specific contexts in which this toxic air has been brewing are not well looked into and understood. While the metropolises hog the spotlight, these smaller cities housing millions are silently choking under a haze of neglect.  Our recent report “Declining Air Quality in Small and Mid-sized Cities” highlights the…

Similar Story

Buckingham Canal restoration: Stuck between ambitious proposals and financial constraints

Buckingham Canal in Chennai, vital for flood control and ecology, faces neglect, pollution and halted restoration due to funding challenges

It has been over two centuries since the construction of the Buckingham Canal, a once vital navigational route stretching from Pedda Ganjam in Andhra Pradesh to Marakkanam in Tamil Nadu. At its peak, the canal could carry 5,600 cubic feet per second (cusecs) of water. However, decades of unplanned urbanisation have drastically reduced its capacity to just 2,850 cusecs with the Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) being the major encroacher. Map: Shanthala Ramesh Regular desilting is crucial for maintaining the Buckingham Canal, yet its upkeep has been a significant challenge since the early 20th century. Over the years, numerous proposals…