How to nudge people into using public transport

Not solving private vehicle congestion is a disincentive as long as a public transport alternative is provided priority lanes and moves faster than the private vehicles.

Private vehicle growth has choked cities and caused massive loss in productivity. With a growing population, moving to mass transport is the only way to avoid further congestion. But there are inconveniences in choosing public transport. One is the need to make multiple changes which means the transition needs to be smooth. Second, Public Transport never drops you at your doorstep. There is always a last mile which would have to be covered by walk or some other mode. Let’s for a moment assume this last mile segment is solved; as a choice architect, what can the state do to nudge people away from private vehicles, into public transport?

  1. Mention ‘walk time’ to the nearest bus/train station at the exits of prominent landmarks and heavy foot traffic areas. This makes the people consider taking the bus/train before deciding to step into an Auto/Taxi or calling a driver. For example, at a mall exit, one could add a signboard to indicate the distance to the nearest bus stop, and perhaps even which areas are connected to it: “2 minutes to BDA bus stop; Connections to Outer Ring Road and Jayanagar”
  2. Private transport disincentive is a key strategy. This can be in the form of congestion pricing and high parking fees. This has worked very effectively in most countries. Even not solving private vehicle congestion is a disincentive as long as a public transport alternative is provided priority lanes and moves faster than the private vehicles.
  3. Show the true cost of private vehicle use, including pollution and time wasted in traffic, as an index (calculated daily) on TV/Radio/Newspaper prominently, that people could check before leaving for work.
  4. Encourage employers to provide bus/train pass as a part of the salary. Employees need to opt out of the pass every month if they want to claim the money instead.
  5. Make public transport stations attractive with facilities surrounding them. Stations/stops with information on things to do in the neighbourhood and utilities like ATM/Restaurants/Bike stand etc. incentivise people to use it.

Sathya Sankaran is the Bicycle Mayor of Bengaluru and advocates for cycling and non-motorised forms of transport. This article was written as part of the AIC community media project at Co Media Lab, in partnership with Deakin University and IdeoSync, first published on Co-media Lab and republished here with required permissions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…